NY 税太高, city 仲有個税, 大把人搬去南面
[美國大選] 佛羅里達州早期投票首日，民主黨暫微幅領先
花與愛麗絲
5001 回覆
397 Like
21 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁第 42 頁第 43 頁第 44 頁第 45 頁第 46 頁第 47 頁第 48 頁第 49 頁第 50 頁第 51 頁第 52 頁第 53 頁第 54 頁第 55 頁第 56 頁第 57 頁第 58 頁第 59 頁第 60 頁第 61 頁第 62 頁第 63 頁第 64 頁第 65 頁第 66 頁第 67 頁第 68 頁第 69 頁第 70 頁第 71 頁第 72 頁第 73 頁第 74 頁第 75 頁第 76 頁第 77 頁第 78 頁第 79 頁第 80 頁第 81 頁第 82 頁第 83 頁第 84 頁第 85 頁第 86 頁第 87 頁第 88 頁第 89 頁第 90 頁第 91 頁第 92 頁第 93 頁第 94 頁第 95 頁第 96 頁第 97 頁第 98 頁第 99 頁第 100 頁第 101 頁第 102 頁第 103 頁第 104 頁第 105 頁第 106 頁第 107 頁第 108 頁第 109 頁第 110 頁第 111 頁第 112 頁第 113 頁第 114 頁第 115 頁第 116 頁第 117 頁第 118 頁第 119 頁第 120 頁第 121 頁第 122 頁第 123 頁第 124 頁第 125 頁第 126 頁第 127 頁第 128 頁第 129 頁第 130 頁第 131 頁第 132 頁第 133 頁第 134 頁第 135 頁第 136 頁第 137 頁第 138 頁第 139 頁第 140 頁第 141 頁第 142 頁第 143 頁第 144 頁第 145 頁第 146 頁第 147 頁第 148 頁第 149 頁第 150 頁第 151 頁第 152 頁第 153 頁第 154 頁第 155 頁第 156 頁第 157 頁第 158 頁第 159 頁第 160 頁第 161 頁第 162 頁第 163 頁第 164 頁第 165 頁第 166 頁第 167 頁第 168 頁第 169 頁第 170 頁第 171 頁第 172 頁第 173 頁第 174 頁第 175 頁第 176 頁第 177 頁第 178 頁第 179 頁第 180 頁第 181 頁第 182 頁第 183 頁第 184 頁第 185 頁第 186 頁第 187 頁第 188 頁第 189 頁第 190 頁第 191 頁第 192 頁第 193 頁第 194 頁第 195 頁第 196 頁第 197 頁第 198 頁第 199 頁第 200 頁第 201 頁
Trump買咗屋, 注册做居民, 所以我用括號.
NY 税太高, city 仲有個税, 大把人搬去南面
NY 税太高, city 仲有個税, 大把人搬去南面
AZ真係好L大獲
I have actually quoted the words of 538 in my answer. Now, I write it again in easier language:
The reason Rasmusst has only a C+ rating because it has not provided horse race polls within 3 weeks of election since 1998. So 538 has NOT really give Rasmusst a rating and all this kinds of polls are put into C+ rating by 538. So, the polls in the C+ can have a wide range of quality.
Rasmuss is not exceptionally good but it is still be considered as high quality so that a lot of poll averages have included it.
The reason Rasmusst has only a C+ rating because it has not provided horse race polls within 3 weeks of election since 1998. So 538 has NOT really give Rasmusst a rating and all this kinds of polls are put into C+ rating by 538. So, the polls in the C+ can have a wide range of quality.
Rasmuss is not exceptionally good but it is still be considered as high quality so that a lot of poll averages have included it.
咁睇唔岩
因為dem吹左雞mail in
呢個先合理
因為dem吹左雞mail in
呢個先合理
Well you didn't respond my argument
The question is the respondent cannot be weighted if the poll even don't notice its existence. Owing to hostility of media towards Trump exacerbated further, I am so worried that their respective poll is finding even more difficult to survey shy voters.
The question is the respondent cannot be weighted if the poll even don't notice its existence. Owing to hostility of media towards Trump exacerbated further, I am so worried that their respective poll is finding even more difficult to survey shy voters.
Cyber rally ? 
激死班美奸同維尼豬I have not said I do not believe polls. Polls are very uesful and they are far from perfect.
You are the people who refuse to read carefully what I have said.
You are the people who refuse to read carefully what I have said.
家族多人幫手
根本東西兩岸就整緊貴族城市
DEM再咁搞D州貧富懸殊得好恐怖，最後只係得返好有錢既人同底下勞動人口，根本同以前畜奴無異
DEM再咁搞D州貧富懸殊得好恐怖，最後只係得返好有錢既人同底下勞動人口，根本同以前畜奴無異sleepy joe上台要加corp tax
corp tax up, earnings drop, valuation down down down
price-in 緊侵輸
corp tax up, earnings drop, valuation down down down
price-in 緊侵輸
The election polls this year contain a lot of voting data since a lot of people have already voted. Hence, the election polls become partial exit polls provided that people have answered the questions as honestly as they were in the past exit polls.
polling errors is derived from size of sample, which, for example, 1000 sample had an error of 3% statistically, 3000 samples 1%; the difference of composition of respondent to real world will be properly weighted by each polling agent based on its data before.
點止270 
maga憎侵
拜登仲有metoo醜聞同Hunter
拜登仲有metoo醜聞同Hunter
block 鳩條英文人啦
叫佢post source link 去做proof又唔post
叫佢post source link 去做proof又唔post
I have included sources in some of the replies. Some people believe that I support Biden so that they just picked one of replies and attacked me.
I just said the fair and unbiased comments and they do not like these comments, so they gave me so many personally attacks by picking one of my replies.
I just said the fair and unbiased comments and they do not like these comments, so they gave me so many personally attacks by picking one of my replies.
大戶之間對賭May I ask a question : which presidential candidate would you prefer
The Clintons are criminals, so are the Bidens. 
仲有今年左媒、華爾街、big tech 總動員
放自己閃卡啦！時間無多!
可能沉默大多數忍得太耐
而家要出嚟示威
而家要出嚟示威
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁第 42 頁第 43 頁第 44 頁第 45 頁第 46 頁第 47 頁第 48 頁第 49 頁第 50 頁第 51 頁第 52 頁第 53 頁第 54 頁第 55 頁第 56 頁第 57 頁第 58 頁第 59 頁第 60 頁第 61 頁第 62 頁第 63 頁第 64 頁第 65 頁第 66 頁第 67 頁第 68 頁第 69 頁第 70 頁第 71 頁第 72 頁第 73 頁第 74 頁第 75 頁第 76 頁第 77 頁第 78 頁第 79 頁第 80 頁第 81 頁第 82 頁第 83 頁第 84 頁第 85 頁第 86 頁第 87 頁第 88 頁第 89 頁第 90 頁第 91 頁第 92 頁第 93 頁第 94 頁第 95 頁第 96 頁第 97 頁第 98 頁第 99 頁第 100 頁第 101 頁第 102 頁第 103 頁第 104 頁第 105 頁第 106 頁第 107 頁第 108 頁第 109 頁第 110 頁第 111 頁第 112 頁第 113 頁第 114 頁第 115 頁第 116 頁第 117 頁第 118 頁第 119 頁第 120 頁第 121 頁第 122 頁第 123 頁第 124 頁第 125 頁第 126 頁第 127 頁第 128 頁第 129 頁第 130 頁第 131 頁第 132 頁第 133 頁第 134 頁第 135 頁第 136 頁第 137 頁第 138 頁第 139 頁第 140 頁第 141 頁第 142 頁第 143 頁第 144 頁第 145 頁第 146 頁第 147 頁第 148 頁第 149 頁第 150 頁第 151 頁第 152 頁第 153 頁第 154 頁第 155 頁第 156 頁第 157 頁第 158 頁第 159 頁第 160 頁第 161 頁第 162 頁第 163 頁第 164 頁第 165 頁第 166 頁第 167 頁第 168 頁第 169 頁第 170 頁第 171 頁第 172 頁第 173 頁第 174 頁第 175 頁第 176 頁第 177 頁第 178 頁第 179 頁第 180 頁第 181 頁第 182 頁第 183 頁第 184 頁第 185 頁第 186 頁第 187 頁第 188 頁第 189 頁第 190 頁第 191 頁第 192 頁第 193 頁第 194 頁第 195 頁第 196 頁第 197 頁第 198 頁第 199 頁第 200 頁第 201 頁