I am not believed polls blindly. Have you read my comments on some of the problems of polls.
The problem is that you do not listen carefully to what I said and make the wrong impression.
拿拿臨念肥賓2020-10-29 13:27:52
話左
本來諗住靠阿燈去大陸發大財
1係 RNC 之後侵追上,一直碌到2 first debate 侵輸 poll 就開始上,肺炎中埋都一直升
生化武器2020-10-29 13:28:30
我覺得唔會太多
勿通膠類2020-10-29 13:28:36
這個最不穩,dems 有奧巴馬帶住登做 rally
HaHaHello2020-10-29 13:29:15
Different states have different last early voting day.
ppucco(鐵三玖)2020-10-29 13:29:18
大勝先贏到,只能說有機會,皆因biden長駐賓州
勿通膠類2020-10-29 13:29:29
能源州好多
Klopp_lfc2020-10-29 13:30:07
538入面嘅民調公司大部分都有金主贊助
一早就有bias
生化武器2020-10-29 13:30:57
希望佢哋識諗,俾拜登打爛飯碗都投佢
ppucco(鐵三玖)2020-10-29 13:31:13
用逆向去睇,就係不穩先要黑馬坐陣,仲要call唔到人
Banality2020-10-29 13:31:52
It won't cost you much time if you re-post the link to validate your argument.
I have posted NBC election page website multiple times and I don't feel it is a nuisance.
母看廢兒柄毒2020-10-29 13:32:28
Gees. How hard is it to add a link for everyone to check your source / read from direct source to chip into the the discussion???
And you went on and on for so many pages trying to justify that shit?? Just drop that already AND add a source link if you really wanna get your point across to others.