你望下cite 2條link個段講咩先
綠色 https://www.dietdoctor.com/weight-loss/macros
藍色 https://www.cedars-sinai.org/blog/what-are-macronutrients.html
Macronutrient Ratios:
The recommended macronutrient ratios for weight loss can vary significantly depending on the source. For example,
the Diet Doctor suggests that many find success with a high protein, low carbohydrate approach, recommending a range of 5-15% carbohydrates, 25-35% protein, and 45-65% fat. Meanwhile,
Cedars-Sinai suggests a different macronutrient breakdown of 20%-30% fat, 30% protein, and 40%-50% carbohydrates for general healthy eating. This discrepancy highlights that there's no "one-size-fits-all" macronutrient ratio for weight loss, making the specific percentages you provided (40-50% carbohydrates, 25-35% protein, 20-30% fat) one of many potential approaches rather than universally optimal.
Weight loss and health improvements
require personalized approaches, ongoing adjustments, and potentially more effort than one may think. So it's important to note that personalization is key to long-term adherence and success.
最後包底
The optimal ratios of macros for weight loss are
generally accepted as:
Carbohydrates: 40-50% of your daily calories
Protein: 25-35% of your daily calories
Fat: 20-30% of your daily calories
However,
individual needs may vary based on factors like activity level, metabolism, and personal preferences.
你了解下點解會一篇文會quote兩個唔同嘅sources
其次 你話專家成員與食品或製藥產業存在利益衝突
==>你想講利益衝突會令研究會偏向證明high carbs diet嘅好處?
Protein普遍賣得貴過Carbs喎
點解咁少source出黎證明low carbs diet>high carbs diet
又學冰水佬講陰謀論
?
你話Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020 - 2025全推動緊plant based diet
我又見唔到喎 入面明明咁寫
Common characteristics of dietary patterns associated with positive health outcomes include relatively higher intake of vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, low- or non-fat dairy, lean meats and poultry, seafood, nuts, and unsaturated vegetable oils, and relatively lower consumption of red and processed meats, sugar-sweetened foods and beverages, and refined grains.
The evidence examined showed broad representation across a number of populations and demographic groups. This suggests a consistent association no matter the region or cultural context in which a healthy dietary pattern is consumed.
In addition, dietary patterns characterized by higher intake of red and processed meats, sugar-sweetened foods and beverages, and refined grains are, in and of themselves, associated with detrimental health outcomes. These findings are consistent with—and build on—the evidence base that informed the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines.
跟住你又話infant formula都建議用plant based milk
但明明人地話
植物奶不應在嬰兒時期取代母乳或嬰兒配方奶。
第二年內可適量攝取無糖植物奶,但營養價值不如牛奶。
目前只有添加營養的豆奶被認為是乳製品的替代品。
PLANT-BASED MILK ALTERNATIVES
Plant-based milk alternatives, which are sometimes referred to as milk alternatives, include beverages made from plants, such as soy, oat, rice, coconut, and almond. These beverages should not be used in the first year of life to replace human milk or infant formula. They may come in different flavors and some forms have added sugars. Unsweetened versions of these beverages may be accommodated in small amounts in the diet during the second year of life, but most have significantly less protein than cow milk and are not always fortified with calcium and vitamin D. Among plant-based milk alternatives, only fortified soy beverage is currently considered a dairy equivalent. Thus, consuming other plant-based beverages does not contribute to meeting dairy recommendations.