冇睇幾日個post
全部都係用一部份疑點去講可能有其他人,另一部份疑點去講又可能係第個人
跟住又屎忽痕又盛
要作個故就作到符合曬所有證據先啦
講完又唔係證明到歐陽係清白,只係講到有個唔符合齊條件既人偷天換日咁呃曬全世界
我地努力緊
冇睇幾日個post
全部都係用一部份疑點去講可能有其他人,另一部份疑點去講又可能係第個人
跟住又屎忽痕又盛
要作個故就作到符合曬所有證據先啦
講完又唔係證明到歐陽係清白,只係講到有個唔符合齊條件既人偷天換日咁呃曬全世界
第一次上訴成功份判詞寫:
10. Again, counsel commented, it was not pointed out to the jury that although there was found in the workshop a roll of white paper similar to a small piece of paper adhering to the girl’s forearm, that small piece contained Chinese characters the writer of which had never been found but who was proved to be neither of the two mechanics employed in the workshop; that being so, it was urged, there is no evidence that the paper adhering to the girl’s forearm came from the workshop.
屌你根本個盒就唔係喺雪糕工場搬出嚟。