有冇巴絲試過168斷食法，成功減肥？
朱自米青
873 回覆
25 Like
102 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁
每日intake有無變先
多餘，小左水份當自己減脂
澱粉點都要食，完全唔食根本係on9
一星期6日168
平時有用myfitnesspal track住 calories intake
每日食1500-1700 calories
一星期2-3日帶氧運動
有低醣飲食
戒咗甜嘢
三個月減咗25磅
分唔到係咪168有用
但未成功減到目標重都想繼續做
因為聽啲外國網站都話168可以減低 insulin fluctuations 幅度
聽落幾有道理咁
又唔係好辛苦 覺得繼續試吓冇壞
平時有用myfitnesspal track住 calories intake
每日食1500-1700 calories
一星期2-3日帶氧運動
有低醣飲食
戒咗甜嘢
三個月減咗25磅
分唔到係咪168有用
但未成功減到目標重都想繼續做
因為聽啲外國網站都話168可以減低 insulin fluctuations 幅度
聽落幾有道理咁
又唔係好辛苦 覺得繼續試吓冇壞
你咁食muscle 都減埋咪快囉 咪亂教人啦
咪亂教人啦我意思係正常飲食再加運動已經足夠，根本唔使斷食咁麻煩
消耗量大過攝取量就ok，所以我以前減肥都係正常三餐，唔會大吃大喝，戒晒啲零食汽水
再加每日跑步咁就已經足夠，個陣一個月瘦5-7kg
消耗量大過攝取量就ok，所以我以前減肥都係正常三餐，唔會大吃大喝，戒晒啲零食汽水
再加每日跑步咁就已經足夠，個陣一個月瘦5-7kg
應該係因為肥婆 越大基數越容易落磅
撚有教
分享下 講埋會反彈都唔睇就抵啦 同埋都係去水多
急切減磅就咁姐
我老母都知 減食+帶氧先係正確
分享下 講埋會反彈都唔睇就抵啦 同埋都係去水多
急切減磅就咁姐
我老母都知 減食+帶氧先係正確
點解
識唔撚識架Ching
如果覺得難既話就唔好減囉 唔好講到好似有人逼你減肥咁
有冇諗過點解自己會肥
如果覺得難既話就唔好減囉 唔好講到好似有人逼你減肥咁
有冇諗過點解自己會肥
不過見到有啲人口講要168斷食，實情係可以食野個段時間就話餓，狂食澱粉質，咁樣有撚用咩運動又唔做，結果仲肥撚過「減肥」前
運動又唔做，結果仲肥撚過「減肥」前重鹽同肥有關係咩
逢星期一至五淨食晚餐，朝早一杯齋啡
有時星期五晚會劈啤酒，星期六日正常三餐加飲酒
兩個月減左10kg，無做運動
有時星期五晚會劈啤酒，星期六日正常三餐加飲酒
兩個月減左10kg，無做運動
Harris, Leanne; Hamilton, Sharon; Azevedo, Liane B.; Olajide, Joan; De Brún, Caroline; Waller, Gillian; Whittaker, Vicki; Sharp, Tracey; Lean, Mike; Hankey, Catherine; Ells, Louisa. Intermittent fasting interventions for treatment of overweight and obesity in adults (PDF). JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. February 2018, 16 (2): 507–547. doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003248.
Do intermittent diets provide physiological benefits over continuous diets for weight loss? A systematic review of clinical trials
Radhika V Seimon 1 , Jessica A Roekenes 1 , Jessica Zibellini 1 , Benjamin Zhu 1 , Alice A Gibson 1 , Andrew P Hills 2 , Rachel E Wood 3 , Neil A King 4 , Nuala M Byrne 3 , Amanda Sainsbury 5
Affiliations expand
PMID: 26384657 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.09.014
Abstract
Energy restriction induces physiological effects that hinder further weight loss. Thus, deliberate periods of energy balance during weight loss interventions may attenuate these adaptive responses to energy restriction and thereby increase the efficiency of weight loss (i.e. the amount of weight or fat lost per unit of energy deficit). To address this possibility, we systematically searched MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, PubMed and Cinahl and reviewed adaptive responses to energy restriction in 40 publications involving humans of any age or body mass index that had undergone a diet involving intermittent energy restriction, 12 with direct comparison to continuous energy restriction. Included publications needed to measure one or more of body weight, body mass index, or body composition before and at the end of energy restriction. 31 of the 40 publications involved 'intermittent fasting' of 1-7-day periods of severe energy restriction. While intermittent fasting appears to produce similar effects to continuous energy restriction to reduce body weight, fat mass, fat-free mass and improve glucose homeostasis, and may reduce appetite, it does not appear to attenuate other adaptive responses to energy restriction or improve weight loss efficiency, albeit most of the reviewed publications were not powered to assess these outcomes. Intermittent fasting thus represents a valid--albeit apparently not superior--option to continuous energy restriction for weight loss.
Radhika V Seimon 1 , Jessica A Roekenes 1 , Jessica Zibellini 1 , Benjamin Zhu 1 , Alice A Gibson 1 , Andrew P Hills 2 , Rachel E Wood 3 , Neil A King 4 , Nuala M Byrne 3 , Amanda Sainsbury 5
Affiliations expand
PMID: 26384657 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.09.014
Abstract
Energy restriction induces physiological effects that hinder further weight loss. Thus, deliberate periods of energy balance during weight loss interventions may attenuate these adaptive responses to energy restriction and thereby increase the efficiency of weight loss (i.e. the amount of weight or fat lost per unit of energy deficit). To address this possibility, we systematically searched MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, PubMed and Cinahl and reviewed adaptive responses to energy restriction in 40 publications involving humans of any age or body mass index that had undergone a diet involving intermittent energy restriction, 12 with direct comparison to continuous energy restriction. Included publications needed to measure one or more of body weight, body mass index, or body composition before and at the end of energy restriction. 31 of the 40 publications involved 'intermittent fasting' of 1-7-day periods of severe energy restriction. While intermittent fasting appears to produce similar effects to continuous energy restriction to reduce body weight, fat mass, fat-free mass and improve glucose homeostasis, and may reduce appetite, it does not appear to attenuate other adaptive responses to energy restriction or improve weight loss efficiency, albeit most of the reviewed publications were not powered to assess these outcomes. Intermittent fasting thus represents a valid--albeit apparently not superior--option to continuous energy restriction for weight loss.
減肥果日卡路里幾多？增肌個日又幾多？
想參考下
而家一減重就脂肪同肌肉都一齊減
想參考下
而家一減重就脂肪同肌肉都一齊減
會唔會瘦咗既係肌肉多過脂肪