[書蟲］你最近睇緊咩書？5
跳跳虎咩咩叫
1001 回覆
112 Like
9 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
揾到有英文電子版呀
我搵過記得係冇插圖
我都好想搵黎share
我都好想搵黎share
係咪libegen呢本
A Mind of Its Own: A Cultural History of the Penis
A Mind of Its Own: A Cultural History of the Penis
係
作者:
作者:
真係無圖
最近睇緊catch 22
鹹書
可以想像到譯者係抱住極大既熱情去譯呢本書
圖書館唔會搵到雖然x寶有
可以send俾出版商求個繁中版
今年睇左好多有趣有深度既書，但呢本真係最juicy
圖書館唔會搵到
雖然x寶有可以send俾出版商求個繁中版
今年睇左好多有趣有深度既書，但呢本真係最juicy
令我諗起之前睇過嘅另一本書
The Pleasure’s All Mine A History of Perverse Sex
巴打有興趣可以睇下
唔係講penis，而係講各種sexual intercourse嘅歷史
The Pleasure’s All Mine A History of Perverse Sex
巴打有興趣可以睇下
唔係講penis，而係講各種sexual intercourse嘅歷史
多謝推薦，話說我另外有本you brain on porn講關於性既神經科學
講關於性既神經科學
（傳聞達聞西係同性戀者，同佢兩個男徒有gay情，亦係作畫對象，而且聞西師傅都畫過聞西）睇呢啲會唔會好大路
呢本我之前睇咗100頁就冇心機睇
係咪叫人戒J㗎
戒j你搵簫別離啦
無論咩時代男人都係瘋狂打j無法自拔:
無論咩時代男人都係瘋狂打j無法自拔:
cls
現代工具人道啲
The Pleasure’s All Mine A History of Perverse Sex都有講 打飛機嘅歷史
提到「打飛機對身體有害」呢個諗法
係19世紀啲營養品小冊子鳩吹出嚟
現代工具人道啲
The Pleasure’s All Mine A History of Perverse Sex都有講 打飛機嘅歷史
提到「打飛機對身體有害」呢個諗法
係19世紀啲營養品小冊子鳩吹出嚟
(據聞牛頓到死都係處男，可能呢個就係成功既秘訣，性封閉時期健康男人既典範)
留名
唔係，再早盧梭（年青成日打）、奧古斯丁已經叫人唔好打丁
但係佢哋嘅理據應該唔係specifically 對身體有害啊嘛
無記錯愛彌兒入面話手淫係罪惡
所以個focus係唔同
前現代係講「罪惡」
但係現代開始講「健康」
盧梭算係現代前期？
前現代係講「罪惡」
但係現代開始講「健康」
盧梭算係現代前期？
對身體有害呢樣以前係少講，教會統治時期有話過唔係射入女大個閪的話都一概視為罪惡，你講個本19世紀小冊子，聽講再早都有同樣類型既著作，不過影響力冇咁大咁解
冇睇開性史研究答你唔到
冇睇開性史研究答你唔到
最初係因爲覺得打飛機等於殺人/打飛機唔係vaginal sex 無助生殖所以違悖自然 之類嘅理由
話說記錯咗，本小冊子係18世紀出嘅
These three factions – medics, Puritans and the bourgeoisie – brought about radical new ideas about masturbation. Up until the discovery of the microscope by Anton van Leeuwenhoek (1632– 1723), the aversion to masturbation and wasting seed was partly due to ignorance of the process of procreation. It was believed that tiny, fully formed humans were carried in the sperm. These cells in the form of humans were called homunculi. Any waste of the precious fluid was therefore tantamount to homicide. With greater medical understanding of procreation, new ideas sprang forth as to why masturbation was dangerous, with medics now acting as the moral authorities.
A watershed came with the publication of a new book on masturbation, Onania; or, The Heinous Sin of Self-pollution, and All Its Frightful Consequences in Both Sexes (c. 1710). The author explained the cause of onanism, its consequences and its cure, and claimed that onanism could cause debilitating diseases, blindness and insanity. Written under anonymous authorship by ‘a clergyman’, it revolutionized people’s perceptions about pleasuring themselves. Although it has been suggested that the author was one Dr Bekker, no one has ever identified such a person, although he was evidently well-read.20 Nor was he either ‘a clergyman’ or a medic; instead he was more than likely to have been a quack, given the amount of advertisements for cures placed prominently in the book. John Marten has also been suggested as the author and this may well be the case, as Marten was not only a quack but had also written other books similar in style and content.21 Two medications in particular were proffered as cures, ‘a strengthening tincture’ sold at ten shillings a bottle and a ‘Prolific powder’ for twelve shillings a bag, an extraor- dinary amount of money given that most labourers’ weekly wages were only a few shillings. These medicines promised to cure symptoms of gonorrhoea – gleets, oozings, sores, emissions – and all other manner of problems associated with the venereal disease, including ‘nocturnal effusions’.22
Source ：The Pleasure’s All Mine A History of Perverse Sex p55-7
話說記錯咗，本小冊子係18世紀出嘅
These three factions – medics, Puritans and the bourgeoisie – brought about radical new ideas about masturbation. Up until the discovery of the microscope by Anton van Leeuwenhoek (1632– 1723), the aversion to masturbation and wasting seed was partly due to ignorance of the process of procreation. It was believed that tiny, fully formed humans were carried in the sperm. These cells in the form of humans were called homunculi. Any waste of the precious fluid was therefore tantamount to homicide. With greater medical understanding of procreation, new ideas sprang forth as to why masturbation was dangerous, with medics now acting as the moral authorities.
A watershed came with the publication of a new book on masturbation, Onania; or, The Heinous Sin of Self-pollution, and All Its Frightful Consequences in Both Sexes (c. 1710). The author explained the cause of onanism, its consequences and its cure, and claimed that onanism could cause debilitating diseases, blindness and insanity. Written under anonymous authorship by ‘a clergyman’, it revolutionized people’s perceptions about pleasuring themselves. Although it has been suggested that the author was one Dr Bekker, no one has ever identified such a person, although he was evidently well-read.20 Nor was he either ‘a clergyman’ or a medic; instead he was more than likely to have been a quack, given the amount of advertisements for cures placed prominently in the book. John Marten has also been suggested as the author and this may well be the case, as Marten was not only a quack but had also written other books similar in style and content.21 Two medications in particular were proffered as cures, ‘a strengthening tincture’ sold at ten shillings a bottle and a ‘Prolific powder’ for twelve shillings a bag, an extraor- dinary amount of money given that most labourers’ weekly wages were only a few shillings. These medicines promised to cure symptoms of gonorrhoea – gleets, oozings, sores, emissions – and all other manner of problems associated with the venereal disease, including ‘nocturnal effusions’.22
Source ：The Pleasure’s All Mine A History of Perverse Sex p55-7