hi 各位書友好耐冇見
日前老高出咗條片講尼采
結果引起熱議,有人屌佢曲解尼采
諗起自己都有一排無睇尼采
所以就用兩日一口氣睇咗Robert Pippin (ed), Introductions to Nietzsche-Cambridge University Press (2012)
劍橋出版社之前將尼采嘅主要作品譯咗英文
每本 作品譯本 都有一片學者撰寫嘅介紹
噉呢本書就將咁多篇介紹 print埋一齊
睇完之後就會對尼采唔同作品嘅思想 有一個big picture
之前睇咗Brian Leiter嘅Nietzsche on Morality
本身對尼采嘅倫理學叫做知道啲皮毛
不過再深入啲認識佢唔同時期嘅著作
都係有啲mind blown
更重要嘅係
每篇文都係由唔同作者寫
講嘅都係尼采唔同嘅著作
當然有啲議題係重複出現㗎喇
但係都會有唔同嘅側重點
例如 Leiter好強調 尼采 自然主義 嘅傾向、反對 人類有 傳統意義下嘅「自由意志」以及批判引伸嘅道德觀,仲有就係喺佢詮釋下嘅 尼采好 精英主義
但係相對地 Aaron Ridley嘅詮釋就比較有人情味(?)一啲?
強調 尼采 講 自我超越、將自己生命詮釋成完整嘅風格 等 面向
似乎比較強調人嘅能動性(即使呢種能動性 依然係建基喺現實嘅限制下)
呢種詮釋上嘅側重點唔同
正好呼應 編者Pippin係introduction所講
The danger of exaggerating our capacity for self-initiated action and so exaggerating a burden of responsibility is, it turns out, as great as the danger of throwing up our hands and in a self-undermining way bemoaning the all pervasive power of fate and the weakness or epiphenomenal status of consciousness and subjectivity itself. Perhaps the best one can say is that Nietzsche is quite good at conveying to us the sense that this, this complicated and near paradoxical situation, is what could more properly be said to be our modern fate.
我應該會隔一本書之後再睇尼采
可能會係Julian Young嘅Friedrich Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography
又或者 Aaron Ridley嘅Nietzsche's Conscience Six Character Studies from the Genealogy
btw
如果你係完全新手的話唔建議直接睇呢本
因爲有啲位可能都係太detail
有關尼采嘅入門書推薦
見
https://thestandnews.com/philosophy/%E6%88%91%E6%80%8E%E6%A8%A3%E8%AE%80%E5%B0%BC%E9%87%87/