我都落左去唔比拎
佢有冇講原因?
我都落左去唔比拎
有豐澤客戶服務熱線職員指,公司網站凌晨時有故障,疑有逾萬件貨品遭「標錯價」以低價出售,由於事件規模太大,公司難對顧客作賠償,故只能把特價品交易取消及盡快向顧客退款,望顧客見諒。
有豐澤客戶服務熱線職員指,公司網站凌晨時有故障,疑有逾萬件貨品遭「標錯價」以低價出售,由於事件規模太大,公司難對顧客作賠償,故只能把特價品交易取消及盡快向顧客退款,望顧客見諒。
source
呢個世界唔係剩係信用卡可以落訂,佢咁都過到骨既話,以後個個有樣學樣收現金落訂跟住hold 起筆cash話10年後有貨。而家啲商家佬柒左鑊金俾人捉到就屌鳩人係支那,咁啲人買樓上唔到會要殺訂又係咩道理??可唔可以話sorry我睇錯價,都係唔買,張約忘記佢俾返啲訂我??
你睇埋註冊會員時既條文先講 你同佢講合約精神 咁註冊會員都係合約
合理價錢 唔會派貨咩?
個個有樣學樣? 人地冇唔畀你cut 單 見到既係你要求用唔合理價錢要人畀貨你
你嗡乜阿1999,佢而家擅自將個送貨日期由2018擅自改到2030 年阿。仲有,唔係我主動行入豐澤叫佢用298賣部iphone 俾我,係佢主動係網上貼出有聖誕大劈價,298一部iphone,咁點會係我要求用唔合理價錢要求佢賣俾我?無話唔俾貨我?無話唔俾cut單??係阿無話過架,但你覺得2030年出貨合唔合理,你撐還撐吖,都搞清楚啲前因後果吖
有豐澤客戶服務熱線職員指,公司網站凌晨時有故障,疑有逾萬件貨品遭「標錯價」以低價出售,由於事件規模太大,公司難對顧客作賠償,故只能把特價品交易取消及盡快向顧客退款,望顧客見諒。
破產囉屌你![]()
其實信用卡好多只係入左機, 未翻單, 所以其實係未入帳落信用卡個度
所以成交好大機會都仲係無效
問題係琴日個post 有人識玩, 用debit card
我用支付寶比錢就一定扣左數
唔好意思
佢扣左你數 唔代表豐澤已收你錢
其實根本同有無收錢係無關係
只要出左交易已完成既message 已代表交易已完成。雙方都要找數
我支持告鳩誠誠架![]()
不過想問下 credit card hold limit 算唔算已完成交易先?手續上賣家未收到錢架喎,prepaid card 就唔知啦
如果hold limit 已經算完成交易,其實俾apple cut 單都應該有得告?
Mistake. 完。
唔好玩啦,傻既都知標錯價錢啦
咪係,典型contract law問題,講左去offer and acceptance
Contract law 唔關offer and acceptance 事![]()
Mistake 有三種
1. Common/ non-agreement mistake
2. Mutual mistake
3. Unilateral mistake
呢個case係第三種
Mistake as to terms of contract + known/ reasonably ought to be known + mistaken party is NOT at fault
1. Hartog v Colin & Shield
Vendor OFFERED mistakenly large quantity of goods at a price per pound (whereas meant to offer the price per piece)
> void
2. Smith v Hughes
Purchaser ACCEPTED mistakenly
Vendor NO misrepresentation > acceptance VALID
Apply 第一個case類似而家情況
但豐澤唔係offeror
第二個case 豐澤係offeree 但offeror根本冇mislead
再refer返 unilateral mistake 第三個requirement
Mistaken party 係豐澤
但佢自己On9 accept左
Contrary to ‘mistaken party is NOT at fault’
以為屌個mistake出黎就無敵?
你以前考緊試做past paper?
我都落左去唔比拎
佢有冇講原因?
https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result.jsp?isadvsearch=1&txtselectopt=2&txtSearch=&txtselectopt1=1&txtSearch1=&txtselectopt2=8&txtSearch2=%E9%99%B8%E5%81%89%E9%9B%84&txtselectopt3=4&txtSearch3=&stem=1&selcourtname=&selcourtype=&selDatabase=JU&order=1&SHC=&page=1
陸偉雄係一個打刑事嘅大狀,叫佢評民事案真係得啖笑
搵大狀評要搵相關領域嘅人打
當初湯渣刑法唔叻打紙盒藏屍案,結果佢咪累炒從此唔打刑事囉
連登仔唔知頭唔知路以為一個打開刑事嘅大狀講民事都一定岩咁
佢提出嘅野根本唔係legal issue,我諗佢廢事講得咁深入記者聽唔明
只能夠講佢評論緊嘅野並非佢執業嘅專攻領域,參考性不大
Btw: https://hk.news.appledaily.com/local/daily/article/20171130/20230049
https://www.speakout.hk/%E6%B8%AF%E4%BA%BA%E8%8A%B1%E7%94%9F/20991/-%E7%AB%8B%E6%B3%95%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%9C%E5%9F%B7%E6%B3%95%E4%BA%BA%E5%93%A1%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%97%E4%BE%AE%E8%BE%B1-%E5%A4%A7%E5%BE%8B%E5%B8%AB%E9%99%B8%E5%81%89%E9%9B%84-%E7%AB%8B%E6%B3%95%E8%A8%82%E7%AB%8B-%E8%BE%B1%E8%AD%A6%E7%BD%AA-%E5%8F%AF%E4%BB%A5%E5%BD%8C%E8%A3%9C%E7%8F%BE%E6%99%82-%E9%98%BB%E5%B7%AE%E8%BE%A6%E5%85%AC-%E7%BD%AA%E7%9A%84%E4%B8%8D%E8%B6%B3
利申,支持連登仔告上法庭,留名食花生
我用支付寶比錢就一定扣左數