[冇圖]睇左好多年聖經 你問我答(6)

1001 回覆
4 Like 15 Dislike
2023-04-07 11:58:46
查個字典先, 廢時對theory又有D咩歧義
Theory :
a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event or
有D乜野fact, 係必須要用到"聖經絕對正確" 呢個assumption

查埋個fact先
Fact :
something that is known to have happened or to exist, especially something for which proof exists, or about which there is information:
2023-04-07 11:59:41
oh shit, 你最討厭嗰個proof字出現左,
一切都係我的錯
2023-04-07 12:05:28
佢既回應本身未必係theory,不過佢論點背後既神學theory (拯救論,救贖論,末世論等等),全部都係base on 呢個assumption。

腦袋是個好東西啊
2023-04-07 12:06:30
謝謝補充
冇錯若因被笠綠帽而離婚再婚就唔算犯罪,因為唔忠貞嘅唔係自己
不過亦冇話被笠綠帽就一定要再婚,如果你接受唔到搵過第二個,你可以獨身或者接納對方嘅悔改而復合
2023-04-07 12:08:18
查個字典先, 廢時對theory又有D咩歧義
Theory :
a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event or
有D乜野fact, 係必須要用到"聖經絕對正確" 呢個assumption

查埋個fact先
Fact :
something that is known to have happened or to exist, especially something for which proof exists, or about which there is information:


Explain a fact = is a fact?
文盲就是文盲
2023-04-07 12:09:50
估到你用一堆"神學" ge 所謂theory
上面比左theory個意思比你睇啦你自己得閒望下
你嗰堆野全部只係用黎講宗教入面ge內容, 即係話你地所謂ge theory一直都無跳出宗教呢個狹隘ge範圍, 即係圍威喂
再簡單D講3個字, "唔入流"

腦袋是個好東西啊
2023-04-07 12:10:25
2023-04-07 12:11:26
都估到你會眨低神學領域
唔識尊重別人既文盲係咁
2023-04-07 12:16:38
神學預域本來就係圍威喂呢個世界公認ga啦
佢地自以為ge一切研究都跳唔出宗教呢個框架
你話如果神學家利用到所謂神學theory成為創造可以造福人群ge成果就值得討論下ge

所以到最後問你有咩theory base on assumption你都只可以用返D神學theory ja嘛
唔通我會預你答我流體力學或者係相對論咩
2023-04-07 12:19:58
咁又唔洗見到個proof個字就嬲到咁ge

到底有D乜野fact必須要靠"聖經絕對正確" 呢個assumption引發ge theory黎解釋je

我仲等緊ga
2023-04-07 12:22:55
2023-04-07 12:26:29
駁唔到架
乜我可以迫人尊重一d野架咩
2023-04-07 12:28:38
係都要張神學拉到科學既層面
神學有佢限制,科學都有
你鍾意只睇一面係你既選擇
2023-04-07 12:35:59
咁你又引用科學說需求
連神學家都認為神學不具備科學嚴謹ge要求

同埋唔好將科學同神學混為一談, 你侮辱左科學
你唯一一句講得岩就係科學同神學都有限制
但係科學就不斷搵方法去解決呢個限制
神學見到限制就停係到講"只管信"
就即係你依家只管信"聖經絕對正確" 呢個belief
2023-04-07 12:37:39
2023-04-07 12:40:50
我咪認左我駁唔到囉
2023-04-07 12:42:14
你叫我點樣尊重廢話
連地平說都比你講ge野更值得尊重
2023-04-07 12:43:13
2023-04-07 12:46:46
科學同神學既討論都係語言,都對語言邏輯有要求

科學說需求係講緊理論學說點組成、假設、hypothesis testing 等等既方法學播?
用呢d語言邏輯apply去神學討論有咩問題?

反正係你一直強調邏輯,而呢d基本邏輯用語都搞到亂一亂,呢個真係
2023-04-07 13:00:48
咁1+1=2都係語言, 不過人地喺呢一句語言背後做左無數次驗證,推敲同搵證據
1+1=3 都係語言啊, 所以佢就可以變成科學啦wo

人地科學說需求第1章第2節已經開始講規律, 第4節講可被事實推翻ge重要性, 第五節講矛盾, 呢D你有無睇到ga

神學連第二節都過唔到wo
神學家佢地自己都認為神學唔可以同科學相比較,
但係點解你反而會用科學方式黎支持你個垃圾assumption
2023-04-07 13:08:56
我全部睇晒播,唔止睇晒,拎埋去考公開試
不過剩係講語言邏輯既基本用詞都搞到亂晒
我都已經唔駛同你討論落去啦
基本功都未學好,學咩人睇低神學/宗教/信仰
2023-04-07 13:13:13
又贏住走
無論證咪又係廢話
2023-04-07 13:15:01
科學討論ge係語言,呢d係乜野驚世發現

即係我地病左食緊ge唔係藥,係一本字典
2023-04-07 13:24:27
你意思係科學討論唔需要用語言
2023-04-07 13:30:58
你剩係見到語言兩個字說急不及待拎住出黎當point講

語言背後要有證據支持ga唔好話科學討論啦,就算正常人討論都要證據啦
係老母係男人你老豆係女人叫唔叫討論啊
你知唔知咩叫討
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞