西醫 vs 另類治療

睇過順勢療法幾年, 雖然醫好咗個皮膚病, 但係醫嘅方法太極端同奇怪, 順勢療法主張唔食小麥(公仔麵, 麵包...), 唔比飲牛奶(奶類產品都唔得), 唔比食刺激嘅食物(咖啡, 辣嘢, 酒..), 咩都賴哂啲西藥, 話食完西藥搞到身體差所以病

不斷叫人食亞麻籽同camu camu, 一日食30粒, 每餐都要食10粒, 仲要超貴, 有一隻藥叫perfect30蚊一粒

利申:已經冇再睇, 洗咗起碼10萬醫病, 回想番超後悔

順勢療法開療劑嘅方法仲奇怪, 想知再講

去到第3個Post了， joe兄其實有無錢收

梗係冇啦, 有錢收仲洗喺度R 水魚

都話academic and market study
邊有錢收
off

扮啦

你只係一隻低級公務員, 學歷CRE, 冇生意嘅傳銷狗

你係上帝？咁又知

你只係physics degree畢業，搵唔到冇physics相關職位，坐係屋企，靠家人搵食的待業人士。仲諗緊讀唔讀pgde好？

不如你學下基礎化學先啦，咩都唔識就學人講醫學

中醫，都冇化學，冇molecular biology 野
醫學一定要識化學？

唔係最重要醫到人就得

咁我搞IT, 請人，都唔駛要求識電腦硬件
佢識algorithm和programming 就得
唔駛佢識電子學
識電子學都冇用，我寧願佢識多個language, 甚至improve language

依家知道點解政府前線做嘢咁廢啦?

又露底
仲要柒到以為識多programming language 等於好勁
柒撚到

on9
呢個係業界共識
自己搵本software engineeeing書睇下啦

睇施政報告咪得囉, 行政玩晒

行政主導

行政創世

去到第3個Post了， joe兄其實有無錢收

梗係冇啦, 有錢收仲洗喺度R 水魚

都話academic and market study
邊有錢收
off

扮啦

你只係一隻低級公務員, 學歷CRE, 冇生意嘅傳銷狗

你係上帝？咁又知

你只係physics degree畢業，搵唔到冇physics相關職位，坐係屋企，靠家人搵食的待業人士。仲諗緊讀唔讀pgde好？

不如你學下基礎化學先啦，咩都唔識就學人講醫學

中醫，都冇化學，冇molecular biology 野
醫學一定要識化學？

唔係最重要醫到人就得

咁我搞IT, 請人，都唔駛要求識電腦硬件
佢識algorithm和programming 就得
唔駛佢識電子學
識電子學都冇用，我寧願佢識多個language, 甚至improve language

唔識化學點開藥呀，同請programmer唔識電腦有咩分別

識行政就得

False Analogy. Definition: In an analogy, two objects (or events), A and B are shown to be similar. Then it is argued that since A has property P, so also B must have property P. An analogy fails when the two objects, A and B, are different in a way which affects whether they both have property P.

The Logical Fallacies: False Analogy - OneGoodMove
onegoodmove.org/fallacy/falsean.htm

咪撚再拎其他professional ge jargon 黎達人啦
最樣衰呢度又唔係冇人睇唔明
到最後又唔知兜去邊

拿logic啊
你最鐘意ge logic啊柒頭皮

去到第3個Post了， joe兄其實有無錢收

梗係冇啦, 有錢收仲洗喺度R 水魚

都話academic and market study
邊有錢收
off

扮啦

你只係一隻低級公務員, 學歷CRE, 冇生意嘅傳銷狗

你係上帝？咁又知

你只係physics degree畢業，搵唔到冇physics相關職位，坐係屋企，靠家人搵食的待業人士。仲諗緊讀唔讀pgde好？

不如你學下基礎化學先啦，咩都唔識就學人講醫學

中醫，都冇化學，冇molecular biology 野
醫學一定要識化學？

唔係最重要醫到人就得

咁我搞IT, 請人，都唔駛要求識電腦硬件
佢識algorithm和programming 就得
唔駛佢識電子學
識電子學都冇用，我寧願佢識多個language, 甚至improve language

唔識化學點開藥呀，同請programmer唔識電腦有咩分別

programmer就係可以唔識電腦

搵本software engineering書黎睇啦
同埋睇下大學software eng的course
電腦運作講得好brief

programmer要識language和algorithm，和埋software eng methodology

你問下有幾多programmer會要用1和0寫code

個個都java, c＃, asp

現家it界個個value business skills and communication skills, 多過technical skills. 至於具體運作，就更加唔駛講。

這個亦係我地it界發展快的原因，
專門化
everybody need to know his part of responsibility

law of specialization +
law of compartative advantage

False Analogy. Definition: In an analogy, two objects (or events), A and B are shown to be similar. Then it is argued that since A has property P, so also B must have property P. An analogy fails when the two objects, A and B, are different in a way which affects whether they both have property P.

The Logical Fallacies: False Analogy - OneGoodMove
onegoodmove.org/fallacy/falsean.htm

咪撚再拎其他professional ge jargon 黎達人啦
最樣衰呢度又唔係冇人睇唔明
到最後又唔知兜去邊

拿logic啊
你最鐘意ge logic啊柒頭皮

佢一句唔認錯就收你皮

狗就係狗

去到第3個Post了， joe兄其實有無錢收

梗係冇啦, 有錢收仲洗喺度R 水魚

都話academic and market study
邊有錢收
off

扮啦

你只係一隻低級公務員, 學歷CRE, 冇生意嘅傳銷狗

你係上帝？咁又知

你只係physics degree畢業，搵唔到冇physics相關職位，坐係屋企，靠家人搵食的待業人士。仲諗緊讀唔讀pgde好？

不如你學下基礎化學先啦，咩都唔識就學人講醫學

中醫，都冇化學，冇molecular biology 野
醫學一定要識化學？

唔係最重要醫到人就得

咁我搞IT, 請人，都唔駛要求識電腦硬件
佢識algorithm和programming 就得
唔駛佢識電子學
識電子學都冇用，我寧願佢識多個language, 甚至improve language

唔識化學點開藥呀，同請programmer唔識電腦有咩分別

識行政就得

岩呀，行政萬歲

specialty 定 responsibility 啊
你都係講英文算啦

False Analogy. Definition: In an analogy, two objects (or events), A and B are shown to be similar. Then it is argued that since A has property P, so also B must have property P. An analogy fails when the two objects, A and B, are different in a way which affects whether they both have property P.

The Logical Fallacies: False Analogy - OneGoodMove
onegoodmove.org/fallacy/falsean.htm

咪撚再拎其他professional ge jargon 黎達人啦
最樣衰呢度又唔係冇人睇唔明
到最後又唔知兜去邊

拿logic啊
你最鐘意ge logic啊柒頭皮

我錯我錯

不過呢度成批人都一樣
屈左我做傳銷狗

False Analogy. Definition: In an analogy, two objects (or events), A and B are shown to be similar. Then it is argued that since A has property P, so also B must have property P. An analogy fails when the two objects, A and B, are different in a way which affects whether they both have property P.

The Logical Fallacies: False Analogy - OneGoodMove
onegoodmove.org/fallacy/falsean.htm

咪撚再拎其他professional ge jargon 黎達人啦
最樣衰呢度又唔係冇人睇唔明
到最後又唔知兜去邊

拿logic啊
你最鐘意ge logic啊柒頭皮

我錯我錯

不過呢度成批人都一樣
屈左我做傳銷狗

冇屈, 你自己認

你成日叫雞唔俾錢架?

傳銷狗

睇過順勢療法幾年, 雖然醫好咗個皮膚病, 但係醫嘅方法太極端同奇怪, 順勢療法主張唔食小麥(公仔麵, 麵包...), 唔比飲牛奶(奶類產品都唔得), 唔比食刺激嘅食物(咖啡, 辣嘢, 酒..), 咩都賴哂啲西藥, 話食完西藥搞到身體差所以病

不斷叫人食亞麻籽同camu camu, 一日食30粒, 每餐都要食10粒, 仲要超貴, 有一隻藥叫perfect30蚊一粒

利申:已經冇再睇, 洗咗起碼10萬醫病, 回想番超後悔

順勢療法開療劑嘅方法仲奇怪, 想知再講

你咩皮膚病
洗10萬
講多d

西醫話我係玫瑰痤瘡, 但我覺得唔係, 因為患者多為 30歲以上的女性, 但我嗰陣得16歲仲要有j的
嗰陣嚴重到行行下街, 有個細路仔指住我問佢呀媽:點解嗰個人塊面咁嘅

每頁回帶:



joe2017係傳銷狗, 死全家

西醫先
但西醫唔係樣樣都醫到

親身經驗

False Analogy. Definition: In an analogy, two objects (or events), A and B are shown to be similar. Then it is argued that since A has property P, so also B must have property P. An analogy fails when the two objects, A and B, are different in a way which affects whether they both have property P.

The Logical Fallacies: False Analogy - OneGoodMove
onegoodmove.org/fallacy/falsean.htm

咪撚再拎其他professional ge jargon 黎達人啦
最樣衰呢度又唔係冇人睇唔明
到最後又唔知兜去邊

拿logic啊
你最鐘意ge logic啊柒頭皮

我錯我錯

不過呢度成批人都一樣
屈左我做傳銷狗

呢度好多「科學人」d logic都好差
特別是語言邏輯
只係識人身攻擊
怪唔得科學的地位咁低
俾公眾睇唔起

科學人，快去學邏輯

西醫先
但西醫唔係樣樣都醫到

親身經驗

thx for opinion

你唔好再提logic啦

Logical Fallacy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/謬誤列表

謬誤與謬論是不恰當的推理，一般而言謬誤指不當的推理思路，而謬論指不當的推理言論，可能是說者有不當思路，或說者無不當思路，但意圖使聽者產生不當思路或其言論明顯容易誤導聽者產生不當思路。也有較寬鬆的使用方式，例如把所有與事實不符的主張皆稱作謬誤。

jor兄偉論笑死我了

False Analogy. Definition: In an analogy, two objects (or events), A and B are shown to be similar. Then it is argued that since A has property P, so also B must have property P. An analogy fails when the two objects, A and B, are different in a way which affects whether they both have property P.

The Logical Fallacies: False Analogy - OneGoodMove
onegoodmove.org/fallacy/falsean.htm

咪撚再拎其他professional ge jargon 黎達人啦
最樣衰呢度又唔係冇人睇唔明
到最後又唔知兜去邊

拿logic啊
你最鐘意ge logic啊柒頭皮

我錯我錯

不過呢度成批人都一樣
屈左我做傳銷狗

呢度好多「科學人」d logic都好差
特別是語言邏輯
只係識人身攻擊
怪唔得科學的地位咁低
俾公眾睇唔起

科學人，快去學邏輯

對住傳銷狗係要打, 唔洗講道理

你以為自己係咩? 你只係一隻五毛低級公務員, 冇生意嘅傳銷狗咋

False Analogy. Definition: In an analogy, two objects (or events), A and B are shown to be similar. Then it is argued that since A has property P, so also B must have property P. An analogy fails when the two objects, A and B, are different in a way which affects whether they both have property P.

The Logical Fallacies: False Analogy - OneGoodMove
onegoodmove.org/fallacy/falsean.htm

咪撚再拎其他professional ge jargon 黎達人啦
最樣衰呢度又唔係冇人睇唔明
到最後又唔知兜去邊

拿logic啊
你最鐘意ge logic啊柒頭皮

我錯我錯

不過呢度成批人都一樣
屈左我做傳銷狗

呢度好多「科學人」d logic都好差
特別是語言邏輯
只係識人身攻擊
怪唔得科學的地位咁低
俾公眾睇唔起

科學人，快去學邏輯

對住傳銷狗係要打, 唔洗講道理

你以為自己係咩? 你只係一隻五毛低級公務員, 冇生意嘅傳銷狗咋

有冇自然療法可以醫到個腦

Logical Fallacy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/謬誤列表

謬誤與謬論是不恰當的推理，一般而言謬誤指不當的推理思路，而謬論指不當的推理言論，可能是說者有不當思路，或說者無不當思路，但意圖使聽者產生不當思路或其言論明顯容易誤導聽者產生不當思路。也有較寬鬆的使用方式，例如把所有與事實不符的主張皆稱作謬誤。

扣帽子、貼標籤或井裏下毒
Poisoning the well
把某些負面特質強加至他人身上，以明示或暗示其主張不可取。

Logical Fallacy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/謬誤列表

謬誤與謬論是不恰當的推理，一般而言謬誤指不當的推理思路，而謬論指不當的推理言論，可能是說者有不當思路，或說者無不當思路，但意圖使聽者產生不當思路或其言論明顯容易誤導聽者產生不當思路。也有較寬鬆的使用方式，例如把所有與事實不符的主張皆稱作謬誤。

扣帽子、貼標籤或井裏下毒
Poisoning the well
把某些負面特質強加至他人身上，以明示或暗示其主張不可取。

咁點算好?

Logical Fallacy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/謬誤列表

謬誤與謬論是不恰當的推理，一般而言謬誤指不當的推理思路，而謬論指不當的推理言論，可能是說者有不當思路，或說者無不當思路，但意圖使聽者產生不當思路或其言論明顯容易誤導聽者產生不當思路。也有較寬鬆的使用方式，例如把所有與事實不符的主張皆稱作謬誤。

扣帽子、貼標籤或井裏下毒
Poisoning the well
把某些負面特質強加至他人身上，以明示或暗示其主張不可取。

咁點算好?

用行政解決啦