曼德拉效應

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

有無人記得保持通話係買充電器定係電池

充電器 100% sure

+1
依家唔同左？

一定係充電器

上個月電視重播先睇完 係叉電器

傾緊電話點換電啊

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

唔係講緊數量既多少 係點解有實物都會打錯

當然你話有76條友都眼殘我就冇嘢好講啦

你答左我先，曼德拉效應點證偽？點先可以令你地心悅誠服地相信曼德拉效應係錯既？

證明時間線只有一條 不可更改
證明即使有多重時空都好 時空之間唔可以融合

你經歷過好多條時間線？

我都想
你咁講同以前既人講地心說有咩分別

係做到日心說相關既observations 之前相信地心說係好理性既選擇

人人都咁諗 就無日心說呢個提問 無呢個提問 就無人探究 無人探究就唔知要到幾時先有人咁啱發現日心說呢樣野 你覺得有無講錯

人地話 日心說相關既observations之前

伽利略自製天文望遠鏡 做左幾多研究先講日心說?
佢係基於大量研究同觀察有重複性既現象先提出 固然可信

曼德拉效應呢? 多幾個人記錯就當係觀察?

人人好似你咁諗 呢個世界就有宗教無科學

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

唔係講緊數量既多少 係點解有實物都會打錯

當然你話有76條友都眼殘我就冇嘢好講啦

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

唔係講緊數量既多少 係點解有實物都會打錯

當然你話有76條友都眼殘我就冇嘢好講啦

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

唔係講緊數量既多少 係點解有實物都會打錯

當然你話有76條友都眼殘我就冇嘢好講啦

你下下都無野好講咁就咪撚咁多嗲啦

如果有人提出一個理論/效應，但現時嘅科技/科學等等都證明唔到係真定假嘅時候，我會偏向相信係真

睇到呢句我都唔知講咩好 2017年仲有d咁既人

唔怪得咁多邪教傳銷撈得起 街邊求其一個邪教都證明唔到佢係假

咁佢咪好唔得閒

我都想
你咁講同以前既人講地心說有咩分別

係做到日心說相關既observations 之前相信地心說係好理性既選擇

人人都咁諗 就無日心說呢個提問 無呢個提問 就無人探究 無人探究就唔知要到幾時先有人咁啱發現日心說呢樣野 你覺得有無講錯

下下都係咁諗咁唔駛做research啦 反正未必係真

科學精神係叫你去懷疑 唔係叫你乜野証據都無就諗一個理論出黎然後話「可能係真」

啱呀 懷疑=否定？
我睇你地立場否定多過懷疑喎
ps.我都唔知自己原來有喺邊個回覆贊同曼德拉效應

OK 咁你有訪個回覆係懷疑或否定曼德拉效應

無懷疑 無否定 又唔贊同 你想點樣

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

唔係講緊數量既多少 係點解有實物都會打錯

當然你話有76條友都眼殘我就冇嘢好講啦

一次公開試柒係同一個嘅人可能仲多，佢地又係平行世界過黎？
76個？

其實英文grammar嘅common error 都係曼德拉效應作怪

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

唔係講緊數量既多少 係點解有實物都會打錯

當然你話有76條友都眼殘我就冇嘢好講啦

一次公開試柒係同一個嘅人可能仲多，佢地又係平行世界過黎？
76個？

其實英文grammar嘅common error 都係曼德拉效應作怪

但上ebay睇返以前d人拍賣sex_the city既cd/dvd
title/內文都係寫sex in the city
但幅圖就係sex and the city
好詭異喎 冇理由睇住 甚至拎住係手都打錯(Johnny walker same)
Btw beat by dre 定beat by dr.dre?

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

唔係講緊數量既多少 係點解有實物都會打錯

當然你話有76條友都眼殘我就冇嘢好講啦

一次公開試柒係同一個嘅人可能仲多，佢地又係平行世界過黎？
76個？

其實英文grammar嘅common error 都係曼德拉效應作怪

根本就係 如果唔係入左平行時空
我攞硬5**啊

古代都有指鹿為馬,三人成虎呢d曼德拉效應例子

如果有人提出一個理論/效應，但現時嘅科技/科學等等都證明唔到係真定假嘅時候，我會偏向相信係真

睇到呢句我都唔知講咩好 2017年仲有d咁既人

唔怪得咁多邪教傳銷撈得起 街邊求其一個邪教都證明唔到佢係假

咁佢咪好唔得閒

我咁講又冇話過我否定曼德拉效應不存在，正如你話你覺得依家證明唔到所以係假，但又唔否定有可能性，其實都係一樣，只係未證明到之前你覺得係真定假。
如果你話已經證實左係記錯都有人信就真係邏輯有問題，但我唔明白點解係未證實之前同你觀點唔同嘅人就係有問題。

呢個有冇人可以講下

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2322090.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+and+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=sex+and+the+city+dvd&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xsex+in+the+city+dvd.TRS0&_nkw=sex+in+the+city+dvd&_sacat=0


打sex and the city dvd就有3520個結果

打sex in the city dvd就有76個結果


你仲想我說明d咩呢?

唔係講緊數量既多少 係點解有實物都會打錯

當然你話有76條友都眼殘我就冇嘢好講啦

一次公開試柒係同一個嘅人可能仲多，佢地又係平行世界過黎？
76個？

其實英文grammar嘅common error 都係曼德拉效應作怪

根本就係 如果唔係入左平行時空
我攞硬5**啊

5**係咩 考試唔要渣火箭咩

古代都有指鹿為馬,三人成虎呢d曼德拉效應例子

古代都有指鹿為馬,三人成虎呢d曼德拉效應例子