千萬別抬頭 Don't Look Up 討論區

1001 回覆
222 Like 24 Dislike
2021-12-31 09:50:00
同埋呢種雖然係連登
但係呢度影視台唔同時事台


一定數量嘅人未必係同你同一個social norms
2021-12-31 09:50:07
調左1.25睇到係正常睇到
2021-12-31 09:50:33
唔係立場,我只睇事實

Trump做左總統,身家大縮水

其他總統就
2021-12-31 09:54:02
正正因為咁,trump先無其他人咁多制肘
唔駛考慮既得利益者面色
2021-12-31 09:57:16
2021-12-31 09:59:58
又一個比左媒洗左腦既人

乜野要好睇舒服就得

Red pill食唔落
2021-12-31 10:01:00
你其實唔係好適合睇戲,應該搵其他娛樂
2021-12-31 10:04:15
Most people are bad at arguing. These 2 techniques will make you better.
Argue better — with science.


1) If the argument you find convincing doesn’t resonate with someone else, find out what does

The answer to polarization and political division is not simply exposing people to another point of view.

On gun control, for instance, liberals are persuaded by stats like: "No other developed country in the world has nearly the same rate of gun violence as does America." And they think other people will find this compelling, too.

Conservatives, meanwhile, often go to this formulation: "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."

What both sides fail to understand is that they're arguing a point that their opponents have not only already dismissed but may be inherently deaf to.

"The messages that are intuitive to people are, for the most part, not the effective ones," Robb Willer, a professor of sociology and psychology at Stanford University, told me in 2015.


How to sway the other side: Use their morals against them
Willer’s work is based on moral foundations theory. It's the idea that people have stable, gut-level morals that influence their worldview. The liberal moral foundations include equality, fairness, and protection of the vulnerable. Conservative moral foundations are more stalwart: They favor in-group loyalty, moral purity, and respect for authority.

The chart below shows how well the moral reframing worked for each policy area in Willer’s study. To be clear, there's only so much that reframing in terms of values can do: It can't turn an anti-Obamacare conservative into a proponent, but it can soften his stance and get him to listen to counterarguments.
2021-12-31 10:06:53
你冇改錯名
2021-12-31 10:11:25
2) Listen. Your ideological opponents want to feel like they’ve been heard.

Conversation worked because we did a simple thing: we listened.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=2663J2d3VY4&feature=emb_logo

In the video above, notice how the voter starts to come around on the issue when the canvasser asks if she's ever been on the receiving end of discrimination. She talks about being picked on at work and feeling different. He responds by telling his own story of being discriminated against for being gay. It's a real heart to heart between strangers.

And in that moment, the canvasser points out that a transgender nondiscrimination law would help people who feel discriminated against at school or work.

"Oh, okay, that makes a lot of sense," she says.

Try out the main message of the strategy: Listen to people, get them to think about their own experience, and highlight your common humanity.

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2016/11/23/13708996/argue-better-science
2021-12-31 10:17:03
屌你老母
2021-12-31 10:24:58
而家我唔係溝女,亦都唔係想說服
有好多事就係咁現實,唔係美麗新世界

有既只係1984既陰暗。你只係令其他人接受得舒服d
2021-12-31 10:30:44
都話討論 點解咁多人屌你
2021-12-31 10:30:58
到底D未睇嘅入黎做乜鳩
人地討論劇情就負評
2021-12-31 10:31:05
「不患寡而患不均」同「魚蛋論」兩個唔同觀點嚟喎。
2021-12-31 10:32:03
基本上全套都係影射嚟
2021-12-31 10:34:27
2021-12-31 10:34:42
佢扮痴線佬咪入戲
2021-12-31 10:34:54
agree
2021-12-31 10:37:12
啲歌詞鳩撚到
2021-12-31 10:37:25
點解會有人覺得係諷刺緊啲左膠
明明成部戲都係影射緊侵同班redneck
仲要搵埋啲左膠大愛藝人去擔演
2021-12-31 10:39:03
個人認為呢套戲暗示左美帝遲早會俾某個on9總統玩死
2021-12-31 10:39:45
最後個女仔粒Lin好靚
2021-12-31 10:39:47
討論區梗係講劇情啦
你自己入黎睇劇透
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞