咁點解唔係控告醫生?
另，如果個家長堅持用西醫療法，個細路死咗，又駛唔駛告個家長?
而家情況係，好多自然療法根本未有根據、研究，只係好多人9up、無限放大嗰少數既所謂奇蹟，如果父母盲信，我講多次，係盲信，咁佢仲堅持用自然療法佢本身係一定有責任
如果佢因為西醫療法而死，父母已經盡左責任，帶佢去接受認可既治療
呢些咪係精英主義 lor
咁如果西醫表明無能為力既情況之下
重應唔應該繼續接受治療?
定放棄任何治療?
定尋找另類治療?
邊個選擇先叫盡咗父母責任?
我會認為可以註冊醫生同意下去尋找另類治療、雙管齊下，大前提係西醫已經表明無能為力，而且係經評估過既另類療法
當有嚴重疾病，首先要進行既應該係有根據且愛規管既治療，而唔係冇足夠實證支持既另類治療，當然我唔係完全否定另類療法既功用
其實限制父母醫療行為 + 強制教育
已經係專制，不民主的表現
你唔好off哂topic得唔得，個post重點唔係乜乜物物既主義制度
因為個post有講開，加拿大人信另類治療，被人判左罪
當時個自然療法醫生已經叫父母帶個仔去急証，而對父母都冇咁做
咁都冇理由干預父母自由，判佢坐監
法律連尊重下學術自由和思想自由都唔識？
個case唔係講緊專業治療對另類治療，而係父母知道兒子好有可能患有腦膜炎而未有提供適切治療，亦導致兒子死亡。因此法院認為呢對即使父母愛佢地的兒子並關心兒子的情況，但行為上不幸引致兒子死亡，因此被判刑。事實上案件同學術自由和思想自由並未有關係。
判辭：
https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2016/2016abqb353/2016abqb353.html
//
The Stephans were not convicted because they gave Ezekiel natural remedies or because of any blameworthy act of commission.Their blameworthy conduct is an omission, a failure to act. The blameworthy conduct is a marked departure from an objective standard, which is not as serious as a marked and substantial departure such as is required in a criminal negligence charge. //
//Both of them are caring and attentive parents. They were both aware of Ezekiel’s condition and symptoms. They both participated in decisions and cared for him throughout including providing natural supplements to him. Neither of them intended to put Ezekiel’s life at risk but on Monday they both believed he had meningitis, discussed going to a doctor, and decided not to. So there is much they knew, decided and did together; but there are also significant differences in their actions.//
//He took no real action when Ezekiel experienced irregular breathing on Tuesday, and when Ezekiel stopped breathing he called his father before calling 911. When Ezekiel started breathing again he told the 911 operator the ambulance did not need to be dispatched.//
//In the trial, the evidence was that Ezekiel became sicker and sicker, to the point he actually stopped breathing before his parents finally sought medical attention.
This is far beyond a child who simply has the sniffles.//
//Society has every right to expect that the minimal required standards of care will be followed, particularly where the risk relates to the life of a vulnerable young child.//
Sentence: 4 months + prob. (husband) & 3 months CSO (wife)
你咪再答我victim victim
癌細胞就應該控制住
