短中線ok
長線就唔太肯定
leap call都可以嘅，反正幾時都可以平倉
Leveraged ETF 討論區 (2)
Outliers
995 回覆
50 Like
2 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁
outliers巴諗住賺夠幾多先諗財自 好勁
TQQQ升多幾倍再算 
out巴
做福連登財經台
有機會希望可以貢獻下期貨部份
不過睇上面有巴打留言已feel到有期貨長線高手臥虎藏龍
做福連登財經台有機會希望可以貢獻下期貨部份
不過睇上面有巴打留言已feel到有期貨長線高手臥虎藏龍😎😎繼續升
有無巴打有入FAS? 好似好撚勁但無咩熱度
1 Upro 同tqqq 比既話
3倍風險下係咪tqqq 風險/回報比吸引過upro?
2 如果玩孖展 qqq voo 大概2.5倍
用ib買都好難爆倉call孖展 加上孖展息好平 相較下同tqqq upro 分別又係邊 會唔會安全得黎回報唔差得過leveraged etf?
3 擺明睇好未來美國國運的話 全倉只有tqqq upro cash 在低位時先去買貨 let’s say 到離上一次高位跌 一至兩成先掃貨 理想面係咪又會做到 定我應該要考慮埋人性易被震走或升少少就忍唔住走貨？
3倍風險下係咪tqqq 風險/回報比吸引過upro?
2 如果玩孖展 qqq voo 大概2.5倍
用ib買都好難爆倉call孖展 加上孖展息好平 相較下同tqqq upro 分別又係邊 會唔會安全得黎回報唔差得過leveraged etf?
3 擺明睇好未來美國國運的話 全倉只有tqqq upro cash 在低位時先去買貨 let’s say 到離上一次高位跌 一至兩成先掃貨 理想面係咪又會做到 定我應該要考慮埋人性易被震走或升少少就忍唔住走貨？
巴打有冇諗過用near nav 既 spac 去泊 cash 好似ipof, psth 咁，應該冇乜downside?
無，downside係SPAC合併之後可以跌穿$10
放得都係炒消息架姐，合併前就轉倉架啦
1. 我覺得係嘅，一來100隻都已經好分散，二來Nasdaq 100同S&P 500好多重疊。印象中全倉TQQQ巴打好似講過TQQQ跌到仆街嘅話，UPRO都走唔甩。不過我兩隻都有，只係TQQQ比重大啲。
2. Leveraged ETF最大特點係daily rebalance ，即係升嘅時候自動加槓桿，跌嘅時候自動減槓桿。依一點同孖展、期權、期貨相反。如果keep住升嘅話，leveraged ETF表現會好過以上咁多樣。
3. 上次TQQQ跌到$116你已經錯過咗啦，下一次機會唔知要等到幾時。人性係跌嘅時候就會驚佢繼續跌，明明喺低位都唔敢入場。
2. Leveraged ETF最大特點係daily rebalance ，即係升嘅時候自動加槓桿，跌嘅時候自動減槓桿。依一點同孖展、期權、期貨相反。如果keep住升嘅話，leveraged ETF表現會好過以上咁多樣。
3. 上次TQQQ跌到$116你已經錯過咗啦，下一次機會唔知要等到幾時。人性係跌嘅時候就會驚佢繼續跌，明明喺低位都唔敢入場。
依個世界都有跌穿$10嘅SPAC呀
SPAC只係保證合併失敗嘅話兩年後俾返$10你，但$10唔係鑽石能量底
SPAC只係保證合併失敗嘅話兩年後俾返$10你，但$10唔係鑽石能量底
QYLD 長年黎睇個人覺得幾穩，利息多於AGG7倍 穩中求勝我會選擇佢加VIG VTI
TQQQ識玩絕對好過DWAC
願聞其詳
一日半日
3.驚佢繼續跌
但我唔係驚佢繼續跌,係根本想佢繼續跌因為仲有本金等入場
搞到而家$123補左一注細細注就升番晒無機會再入了
又要繼續觀望
玩3x ETF煩惱既除左驚股災式大跌走唔切（上年３月咁）
就係煩唔知幾時加注
佢跌又望佢跌多Ｄ先掃平貨，佢升又驚做摸頂師
但我唔係驚佢繼續跌,係根本想佢繼續跌
因為仲有本金等入場搞到而家$123補左一注細細注就升番晒無機會再入了
又要繼續觀望玩3x ETF煩惱既除左驚股災式大跌走唔切（上年３月咁）
就係煩唔知幾時加注
佢跌又望佢跌多Ｄ先掃平貨，佢升又驚做摸頂師最怕就係忍唔到口果時重倉左然後股災，然後TQQQ大特價果時冇錢入。
QYLD有兩大cash outflow
一係keep住派息，二係指數升嗰陣short call會輸錢
咁啲錢邊度嚟？
一係賣股票，一係之前short call贏落嘅錢
Nasdaq 100升多跌少，short call我估輸多過贏，即係啲錢多數嚟自賣股票
一係keep住派息，二係指數升嗰陣short call會輸錢
咁啲錢邊度嚟？
一係賣股票，一係之前short call贏落嘅錢
Nasdaq 100升多跌少，short call我估輸多過贏，即係啲錢多數嚟自賣股票
無完美做法㗎
早入場有早入場嘅好處，等大跌入場又有佢嘅好處
我就覺得早入場實際啲，等大跌無咩人做到
早入場有早入場嘅好處，等大跌入場又有佢嘅好處
我就覺得早入場實際啲，等大跌無咩人做到
我分享我師傅研究
AN INCOME SIG FRAMEWORK:
REBALANCING TO A TARGET GROWTH RATE
Attention: In these periodic Income Sig installments, I explore ideas with you and share my research. I am not announcing a new plan. No changes to the letter are imminent. If and when I come up with an Income Sig plan and/or decide to make changes to our established Sig plans, I will announce it clearly. Please don’t change the way you run your Sig plans based on these Income Sig explorations.
One possible way to structure an Income Sig plan is to run a three-fund portfolio that includes a growth portion that could be dialed down over time to emphasize income. For example:
AGG — general bond ETF for stability and low yield
QYLD — covered call ETF for low volatility and high yield
TQQQ — leveraged equity ETF for high volatility and growth
On our usual quarterly schedule, both QYLD and TQQQ could be rebalanced to separate quarterly growth targets, such as 2% for QYLD and our tried-and-true 9% for TQQQ. As usual, proceeds from resulting sell signals would go into AGG; buying power for resulting buy signals would come from AGG.
Today, I’ll go through how such a plan would have proceeded over the past two years. In a subsequent installment, I’ll go through a rote rebalancing approach, such as resetting the funds to a 34/33/33 AGG/QYLD/TQQQ allocation, for comparison.
Let’s say that you retired at the end of Q319 with $1,000,000, and allocated it as follows:
34% AGG
33% QYLD
33% TQQQ
This set you up as follows:
3,004 shares of AGG @ 113.17 = $339,963
14,602 shares of QYLD @ 22.60 = $330,005
10,707 shares of TQQQ @ 30.82 = $329,990
AGG and QYLD paid the following quarterly distributions over the next two years (each pays more often than once per quarter, but for this study I tallied their quarterly distributions):
佢向我表示都認為QYLD 長線退休INCOME 首選，QYLD成長性已經排除唔睇
AN INCOME SIG FRAMEWORK:
REBALANCING TO A TARGET GROWTH RATE
Attention: In these periodic Income Sig installments, I explore ideas with you and share my research. I am not announcing a new plan. No changes to the letter are imminent. If and when I come up with an Income Sig plan and/or decide to make changes to our established Sig plans, I will announce it clearly. Please don’t change the way you run your Sig plans based on these Income Sig explorations.
One possible way to structure an Income Sig plan is to run a three-fund portfolio that includes a growth portion that could be dialed down over time to emphasize income. For example:
AGG — general bond ETF for stability and low yield
QYLD — covered call ETF for low volatility and high yield
TQQQ — leveraged equity ETF for high volatility and growth
On our usual quarterly schedule, both QYLD and TQQQ could be rebalanced to separate quarterly growth targets, such as 2% for QYLD and our tried-and-true 9% for TQQQ. As usual, proceeds from resulting sell signals would go into AGG; buying power for resulting buy signals would come from AGG.
Today, I’ll go through how such a plan would have proceeded over the past two years. In a subsequent installment, I’ll go through a rote rebalancing approach, such as resetting the funds to a 34/33/33 AGG/QYLD/TQQQ allocation, for comparison.
Let’s say that you retired at the end of Q319 with $1,000,000, and allocated it as follows:
34% AGG
33% QYLD
33% TQQQ
This set you up as follows:
3,004 shares of AGG @ 113.17 = $339,963
14,602 shares of QYLD @ 22.60 = $330,005
10,707 shares of TQQQ @ 30.82 = $329,990
AGG and QYLD paid the following quarterly distributions over the next two years (each pays more often than once per quarter, but for this study I tallied their quarterly distributions):
佢向我表示都認為QYLD 長線退休INCOME 首選，QYLD成長性已經排除唔睇
睇埋隻qylg
尼隻write 50% covered call, 派5至6％息，可以享受underlying qqq既升幅
尼隻write 50% covered call, 派5至6％息，可以享受underlying qqq既升幅
thx 有時間研究下呢隻
應該都係攞本金嚟畀息 好多主動基金都鍾意咁做