近排搵開關於qs移民澳洲既info,咁岩係度search到個post
見到有幾位qs brother 都諗緊走佬去澳洲,其實我有個問題係關於aiqs skilled assessment,佢basic既requirement都幾低下
pathway 3: qualified oversee degree + min 2yrs post-qualification exp
(i.e. aiqs skilled assessment http://www.aiqs.com.au/imis/documents/Skilled%20Migration%20Assessment%20Policy%202016.pdf)
我就7 8年前u grad in surveying 既,但一直都冇乜心做qs, 但都叫做有斷斷續續 2-3 yrs qs full time work experience (同埋都搵得番曬d supervisors 簽得到果d supervision,同埋supervisor 都係 chartered &/or meet到佢既requipment) ; degree就qualified既,但擔心佢min 2 yrs post-qualification exp e 個requirement 會唔會其實"真係basic", 真正成功過到aiqs既skilled assessment既人遠遠超過2yrs exp呢?
希望有過來人&/or同路人一齊開心share
thz x 10000000000
佢係assess你工作經驗,俾唔俾visa 你唔關佢事㗎,佢係提供服務,唔係幫移民局截龍,你同其他人有30年經驗一齊去俾佢assess 都唔會影響你過唔過到嘅機會
““““你同其他人有30年經驗一齊去俾佢assess 都唔會影響你過唔過到嘅機會“““
對這正正是我的關注點,因為aiqs 最後只會address你係"suitable or not suitable"
"If you wish to apply to migrate to Australia as a Quantity Surveyor under the General Skilled Migration Program, you will need to have your skills assessed by the AIQS prior to submitting your Expression of Interest (EOI). The AIQS will assess your skills and/or qualifications as either “suitable” or “not suitable” for your nominated occupation against the AIQS requirements it has established."
http://www.aiqs.com.au/imis/documents/Skilled%20Migration%20Assessment%20Policy%202016.pdf
但係佢“甚至“冇寫過話會根據“其他野”去assess Ur suitability 除在果兩個19既basic requirements
所以我既interpretation係,好似真係單單meet到果兩個basic requirements, 就會話你suitable, 係咁就好喇;但我就係擔心唔係,如果唔係就真係要過去補個master行pathway 1=="