『薪火post』BNO 續期資訊(31) 支國爆了，你們應當悔改
az-687
1001 回覆
45 Like
1 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
HX UO無問題喎
之後去過兩次日本，搭廉航快運同Jetstar 都可以online check-in
搭過 uo 冇問題
試過UO關西返香港冇事
我記得只得SQ同其他一兩間係唔得
UO NRT KIX HND 都冇事
小弟今日搭 SQ , online check in 無問題
其實唔洗再回online checkin呢D問題
Fb Post by Lord Alton:
Home Office Signals Progress for Hong Kong’s Holders of British Nationals Overseas Passports.
On Monday March 4th I chaired a meeting at the House of Lords on behalf of the charity, Hong Kong Watch. A capacity audience heard accounts from five activists from Hong Kong. The main focus of the meeting was about the 152,350 Hong Kongers who hold a BNO passport.
David Alton said;
“It is positive that the United Kingdom is looking to become world leaders in automated passenger clearance, but it is puzzling that privileged access is being given to foreign nationals from the United States, Japan, South Korea and elsewhere, while people holding British passports continue to wait in line. It is particularly confusing that the Hong Kong SAR passport has access to the e-passport gates, but BNO passports do not.
What does it communicate to the rest of the world that British passports holders are being forced to queue not only behind every European, but also foreign nationals?
It is easy to forget that there are hundreds of BNO passport holders who fought for the British army when they were British citizens prior to handover. Does their service not matter to us? Should they really be waiting behind the Japanese or South Koreans?
I campaigned for British Dependent Territory Citizens in Hong Kong to be given right of abode, or at least the choice to retain their citizenship, when the handover discussions were taking place. Unfortunately, our negotiations with China denied them their right to self-determination, offering only the BNO passport as a token compromise. These passports were designed to acknowledge the historic ties the United Kingdom has with Hong Kong, and our ongoing commitment to the people of Hong Kong under the Sino-British Joint Declaration. This is a cost-free way of ensuring that these British passports mean something.”
Following the meeting, Baroness Williams of Trafford, a Home Office Minister has promised, in a letter to Lord Alton (attached), that the Home Office will examine the restrictions on BNO passport holders being able to use automated passenger clearance.
大家覺得遲下有冇機會返祖國用e-gate
Home Office Signals Progress for Hong Kong’s Holders of British Nationals Overseas Passports.
On Monday March 4th I chaired a meeting at the House of Lords on behalf of the charity, Hong Kong Watch. A capacity audience heard accounts from five activists from Hong Kong. The main focus of the meeting was about the 152,350 Hong Kongers who hold a BNO passport.
David Alton said;
“It is positive that the United Kingdom is looking to become world leaders in automated passenger clearance, but it is puzzling that privileged access is being given to foreign nationals from the United States, Japan, South Korea and elsewhere, while people holding British passports continue to wait in line. It is particularly confusing that the Hong Kong SAR passport has access to the e-passport gates, but BNO passports do not.
What does it communicate to the rest of the world that British passports holders are being forced to queue not only behind every European, but also foreign nationals?
It is easy to forget that there are hundreds of BNO passport holders who fought for the British army when they were British citizens prior to handover. Does their service not matter to us? Should they really be waiting behind the Japanese or South Koreans?
I campaigned for British Dependent Territory Citizens in Hong Kong to be given right of abode, or at least the choice to retain their citizenship, when the handover discussions were taking place. Unfortunately, our negotiations with China denied them their right to self-determination, offering only the BNO passport as a token compromise. These passports were designed to acknowledge the historic ties the United Kingdom has with Hong Kong, and our ongoing commitment to the people of Hong Kong under the Sino-British Joint Declaration. This is a cost-free way of ensuring that these British passports mean something.”
Following the meeting, Baroness Williams of Trafford, a Home Office Minister has promised, in a letter to Lord Alton (attached), that the Home Office will examine the restrictions on BNO passport holders being able to use automated passenger clearance.
大家覺得遲下有冇機會返祖國用e-gate
Promised to examine 應該會變
都唔似有咩安全問題
以前係佢地側側膊啫
依家有議員講到出面
等好戲
尤其依家個home secretary似幾順攤
佢係上台嚟搞windrush個蘇州屎
希望佢識多一事不如少一事過咗佢
都唔似有咩安全問題
以前係佢地側側膊啫
依家有議員講到出面
等好戲
尤其依家個home secretary似幾順攤
佢係上台嚟搞windrush個蘇州屎
希望佢識多一事不如少一事過咗佢
識玩，尤其脫歐後要英國優先，而家講到出面連區區passport e-gate都有英國護照用唔到反而外國人用到。
毒果不嬲誇大
但唔代表個會議冇意義
上面都講有信畀home office
依個就係實際行動
有冇喺國會主辦嘅大會到討論都係其次
反而有嗰啲「真.討論」咪又係話「得閒飲茶」
同埋針肥彭唔去
其實如有佢話個會議係冇影響力
點解佢仲要介意肥彭有冇去？
再者其實英國政壇咁多有地位嘅人
肥彭「相對」上都唔係好有影響力
佢針毒果我冇意見，佢地成日都係噉
但針平權嘅進程，我諗佢要擔心下啦
但唔代表個會議冇意義
上面都講有信畀home office
依個就係實際行動
有冇喺國會主辦嘅大會到討論都係其次
反而有嗰啲「真.討論」咪又係話「得閒飲茶」
同埋針肥彭唔去
其實如有佢話個會議係冇影響力
點解佢仲要介意肥彭有冇去？
再者其實英國政壇咁多有地位嘅人
肥彭「相對」上都唔係好有影響力
佢針毒果我冇意見，佢地成日都係噉
但針平權嘅進程，我諗佢要擔心下啦
ukmacau
澳門人在英國？
太長唔quote文 我印象中係因為Lord Alton寫咗信俾home office要求檢討現時BNO holder用唔到e-gate 嘅情況，所以先會有現時個Progress；而唔係英國政府專揀HKW BNO Seminar 中審視電子過關呢條嚟回應
事實上個seminar的確唔係英國國會主持 呢方面係毒果跟車太貼
我印象中係因為Lord Alton寫咗信俾home office要求檢討現時BNO holder用唔到e-gate 嘅情況，所以先會有現時個Progress；而唔係英國政府專揀HKW BNO Seminar 中審視電子過關呢條嚟回應 事實上個seminar的確唔係英國國會主持 呢方面係毒果跟車太貼
呢條友只係一個次次有咩風吹草動就講一啲阿媽係女人嘅嘢黎潑下大家冷水同叫大家接受下現實之外，我睇唔到仲有啲咩有建設嘅說話可以聽得到，以後無咩必要可以唔使quote 佢講嘅嘢
同意
佢咬彭定康嘅感覺似新華社
加上一定係降溫
又唔似幫澳門人
古古怪怪
佢咬彭定康嘅感覺似新華社
加上一定係降溫
又唔似幫澳門人
古古怪怪
不過真心， 本身作為既得利益者，係我都唱淡，費時一陣真係得米分薄哂d jetso。
條友除咗潑BNO冷水之外就無野做。quote 佢黎做乜？
聲明書如果唔交副簽,係咪右上簽個名就OK?無其他野填?