FBI IG Report呢單就正囉
首先係個report原文:
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
雖然有成五百幾版, 但睇開頭executive summary(唔長, 得14版)同最後第497頁起conclusion(4版)兩parts, 都大體上知道呢份report講左乜
利申: 剩係睇左呢兩part
呢份report係回應就FBI同DOJ係查Hillary用私人email處理公務一案上面, 包括國會在內, 一堆人嘅疑問/指控, 睇下有無乜問題, 同埋有乜改善空間, 即係係一篇超長嘅薯仔文
啲疑問/指控大家都耳熟能詳, 包括最出名Trump講左N次, 做乜鳩唔拉Hillary(「LOCK HER UP」), FBI偏幫Hillary, 前局長Comey偏幫民主黨, 兩位職員Strzok同Page被指涉嫌用公職權力反Trump等(Strzok曾同時係FBI通俄調查隊成員), leakers問題等
咁呢個report集中探討FBI嘅Midyear Investigation, 即係上述話調查Hillary用私人email處理公務一案
OIG(Office of Inspector General)呢份report, 一開始outline左上述調查上嘅一啲決策, 以及佢地想查啲乜:
The question we considered was not whether a particular investigative decision was the ideal choice or one that could have been handled more effectively,
but whether the circumstances surrounding the decision indicated that it was based on considerations other than the merits of the investigation.
即係佢地唔係調查FBI某決定/做法啱唔啱, 而係調查FBI某決定/做法有無受調查本身以外嘅因素所影響, 例如政治立場, 受賄之類
例如一度搞到滿城風雨嘅Strzok-Page text事件, 即係佢兩個用公事電話講:
“[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”"
"No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it”
OIG開波就同你講結論係乜: 「我地搵唔到有證據顯示, 有不當考慮(例如政治偏見)影響調查」:
"Nonetheless, these messages cast a cloud over the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation and the investigation’s credibility.
But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable. "(p. iii)
同時有提到, 佢兩位其實反而曾經提議要更積極搜證, 例如出傳票同搜索令去括Hillary料:
"We further found evidence that in some instances Strzok and Page advocated for more aggressive investigative measures in the Midyear investigation, such as the use of grand jury subpoenas and search warrants to obtain evidence." (p. iii)
係下面專門講傳訊, 用私人email等部分, 再同你講一次:
" We found that the conduct of these five FBI employees brought discredit to themselves, sowed doubt about the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation, and impacted the reputation of the FBI.
Although our review did not find documentary or testimonial evidence directly connecting the political views these employees expressed in their text messages and instant messages to the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, the conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the FBI Midyear investigation and sowed doubt the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation."
但要注意嘅係, OIG寫明, 每位FBI職員有理治立場唔係問題:
"We do not question that the FBI employees who sent these messages are entitled to their own political views."(p. xii)
即係佢唔理你私人政治立場, 唔好撈落公事到就得, 仲有, 唔好用公事電話講私人嘢
而係唔檢控Hillary上面, OIG結論係「我地搵唔到證據顯示關偏見等不當考慮事, 佢地呢項決定係出於專業立場」
"...We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or
other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice.
We therefore concluded that these were legal and policy judgments involving core prosecutorial discretion that were for the Department to make." (p. vii)