[書蟲］你最近睇緊咩書？9

Lawrence Rees本Holocaust我都未睇

你講嗰本係馮客寫
應該都唔錯嘅

呢本幾好 淺白易明

我覺我寫得太淺

要寫足八個dictators，篇幅會太長

我會期待佢單獨詳細寫一兩個，多過八個簡略講

本書唔長，係有限篇幅講太多人

佢specialise modern Chinese history
寫咗毛魔三部曲 好值得睇下 不過我都未開始睇

我知有英文版 但有無中文？

【當代中國史學家馮客三部曲典藏套書】：解放的悲劇、毛澤東的大饑荒、文化大革命

https://www.books.com.tw/products/0010895431?sloc=main

睇完墨索里尼篇，幾有趣。
可能係我本身歷史知識少？
一睇，全部都係新鮮既新知咁。

感想：
1 意大利似乎本身國力弱 墨索里尼入侵前既意大利本身就國力弱
2 墨索里尼只有宣傳能力好 一切經濟 軍事 管理用人 都無能
3 有好多被視為應該有眼光既國外人 譬如甘地 都曾經對墨索里尼表示欣賞
4 軍隊殘忍 濫殺 用化武
5 法西斯 連黨綱都思路不清 無足夠豐富既思想指引政治發展
6 墨索里尼有無諗過國家人民利益 定一直都只係借國力享受自己被崇拜既快感？

7 想睇下Hitler 好似相對地 係有實力

八掛想統計一下，正文前面啲推薦序你地會唔會睇哂？
睇
唔睇

唔睇
我睇書時間有限
我睇一本書 係因為想睇作者寫嗰本書
我想感覺作者既精神
我對其他人既精神無興趣

我會將我既時間用盡係我鍾意既精神
所以我只會睇作者寫既部分
包括前言或序
但唔會睇其他人 其他精神寫既野

會睇，我覺得睇曬成本書既文字先係睇完一本書
非小說類既睇咗個序先，通常總結成本書既內容，咁樣睇內文之前有個基本概念
如果係小說，睇咗內文先睇推薦序或附錄
序言可能係推薦者的個人感想或藉此帶出某種觀點
通常睇完小說我都會揾下其他人既評價/解讀嚟睇，對比我既感受同觀點，睇下有咩分別/盲點，加強對小說既理解
有啲其他人（尤其係地位高既名人作家/批評家）寫既序言/後記會成為討論重點
例如陳雪《惡女書》入面楊照既序就引發好多討論，如果要研究/分析就不可不提

留名

墨索里尼嘅法西斯黨本身係一個好鬆散嘅組織，就算去到奪權之前都未係一個權力集中嘅政黨。就連奪權都係保守派deal好之後先畀佢上位。
相比起希特拉將納粹黨打造成自己嘅政黨，兼且靠議會抗爭成功攞到話語權，成件事唔同好多。睇得出墨索里尼比希特拉真係爭咁啲。

噉希特拉都係靠保守派deal好先做到總理嘅

我之前有寫過Robert Paxton本Anatomy of Fascism
https://lih.kg/rwcfRHX

當中就係用意大利法西斯同德國納粹做例子嚟嘗試描畫法西斯主義嘅paradigm

German voters never gave the Nazis a majority of the popular vote, as is still sometimes alleged. As we saw in the last chapter, the Nazis did indeed become the largest party in the German Reichstag in the parliamentary election of July 31, 1932, with 37.2 percent of the vote. They then slipped back to 33.1 percent in the parliamentary election of November 6, 1932. In the parliamentary election of March 6, 1933, with Hitler as chancellor and the Nazi Party in command of all the resources of the German state, its score was a more significant but still insufficient 43.9 percent.19 More than one German in two voted against Nazi candidates in that election, in the teeth of intimidation by Storm Troopers. The Italian Fascist Party won 35 out of 535 seats, in the one free parliamentary election in which it par- ticipated, on May 15, 1921.

Since the fascist route to power has always passed through cooperation with conservative elites, at least in the cases so far known, the strength of a fascist movement in itself is only one of the determining variables in the achievement (or not) of power, though it is surely a vital one. Fascists did have numbers and muscle to offer to conservatives caught in crisis in Italy and Germany, as we have seen. Equally important, however, was the conservative elites’ willingness to work with fascism; a reciprocal flexibility on the fascist leaders’ part; and the urgency of the crisis that induced them to cooperate with each other.

最慘係Hindenburg死咗之後冇人阻到Nazi

會睇，但會睇完正文先返轉頭睇序

希特拉對上一任總理Kurt von Schleicher，就係因爲Hindenburg唔信任佢，唔畀佢好似von Papen噉狂用總統敕令權，所以倒臺

某程度上Hindenburg算係有份推希特拉上位

作者以外既導讀/編輯的話一律唔睇，小說有前言通常會睇。非小說先睇序同目錄，再直接睇總結，睇完總結再從頭睇/揀黎睇，最後有跋睇埋個跋

lm

多謝大家嘅回應
我就慣咗睇，感覺無睇埋就無完成一本書咁，會唔自在
但作者以外嘅導讀/推薦序，好多時又get唔到啲咩，一本有3~4篇序仲會覺得出版想呃頁數
最近睇完本「高手學習」 (希望遲啲寫得出分享文)
作者講到現今資訊太多，自己要識過濾有乜野係自己想知/需要，調節閱讀速度，唔啱用就飛住睇 (即係推薦序嗰啲skip咗都唔可惜)
不過我又未到學者級咁大量閱讀資料性嘅書，睇科普類嘅都係均速由頭睇到尾
但預計自己以後會：
科普/非小說類 - 飛咗作者以外的序/導讀
小說類 - 睇完正文先返轉頭睇其他人嘅序，揾下有無共感

推薦序通常只係廣告文案,會skip
其他既通常都睇



試過無咩background咁睇Guattari and Deleuze
成本書幾乎只係睇得明由Foucault寫既preface 同introduction