召集所有想考Cadet Pilot既巴絲

個班西HR 一年先請幾個 係度話candidate 唔夠班

嗰班on9 HR

個recruitment head係西中之西

過唔到 1B HR interview, 任你technical曉飛都無用

嗰班on9 HR

個recruitment head係西中之西

過唔到 1B HR interview, 任你technical曉飛都無用

1B 算易，panel in 先harsh

個recruitment head係西中之西

過唔到 1B HR interview, 任你technical曉飛都無用

1B 算易，panel in 先harsh

聽過有時HR都係隨便問兩句然後八成時間畀capt./SFO問tech

繼DACP後喺連登嘅第二個機師帖

過唔到 1B HR interview, 任你technical曉飛都無用

1B 算易，panel in 先harsh

聽過有時HR都係隨便問兩句然後八成時間畀capt./SFO問tech

咁佢都幾好彩

留名

冇physics同數底
都幾難睇得明本野
下下睇兩睇就要google

FAA? 其實本野寫得麻麻

冇physics同數底
都幾難睇得明本野
下下睇兩睇就要google

FAA? 其實本野寫得麻麻

有physics同數bg都係係咁Google/ youtube
其實無咩關係

2.其實係想compare raked wingtip vs conventional winglet
一個more efficient during cruising 一個more efficient on climbing
所以用係extra long haul vs mid long haul

Morning

Blended winglet (744)
1. Higher pressure in the outside face of the winglet
2. Lower pressure in the inside face of the winglet
3. Lift is generated
4. Forward lift component can be generated
5. More effective when high aoa as the pressure diff is higher

Raked wingtip (77w)
1. Higher AR, less drag
2. They kind of re-distributed the wingload, no solid ans for this one from me

Try try this:

" in steady climb, the lift is smaller, greater or equal to the weight? "

2.其實係想compare raked wingtip vs conventional winglet
一個more efficient during cruising 一個more efficient on climbing
所以用係extra long haul vs mid long haul

Morning

Blended winglet (744)
1. Higher pressure in the outside face of the winglet
2. Lower pressure in the inside face of the winglet
3. Lift is generated
4. Forward lift component can be generated
5. More effective when high aoa as the pressure diff is higher

Raked wingtip (77w)
1. Higher AR, less drag
2. They kind of re-distributed the wingload, no solid ans for this one from me

Try try this:

" in steady climb, the lift is smaller, greater or equal to the weight? "

Smaller 好易中伏

冇physics同數底
都幾難睇得明本野
下下睇兩睇就要google

FAA? 其實本野寫得麻麻

真係，有 d 位有時寫到好虛
D 字又太 academic
但有時都 helpful 既

2.其實係想compare raked wingtip vs conventional winglet
一個more efficient during cruising 一個more efficient on climbing
所以用係extra long haul vs mid long haul

Morning

Blended winglet (744)
1. Higher pressure in the outside face of the winglet
2. Lower pressure in the inside face of the winglet
3. Lift is generated
4. Forward lift component can be generated
5. More effective when high aoa as the pressure diff is higher

Raked wingtip (77w)
1. Higher AR, less drag
2. They kind of re-distributed the wingload, no solid ans for this one from me

Try try this:

" in steady climb, the lift is smaller, greater or equal to the weight? "

Smaller 好易中伏

呢個堅伏 你又搵 d 問題吹下

Morning

Blended winglet (744)
1. Higher pressure in the outside face of the winglet
2. Lower pressure in the inside face of the winglet
3. Lift is generated
4. Forward lift component can be generated
5. More effective when high aoa as the pressure diff is higher

Raked wingtip (77w)
1. Higher AR, less drag
2. They kind of re-distributed the wingload, no solid ans for this one from me

Try try this:

" in steady climb, the lift is smaller, greater or equal to the weight? "

Smaller 好易中伏

呢個堅伏 你又搵 d 問題吹下

就問下你個名啦 點解design要dihedral

Smaller 好易中伏

呢個堅伏 你又搵 d 問題吹下

就問下你個名啦 點解design要dihedral

Increase lateral stability

Lm

lm

呢個堅伏 你又搵 d 問題吹下

就問下你個名啦 點解design要dihedral

Increase lateral stability

Dihedral - lateral stability

Anhedral - increases maneuverability

LM學嘢

冇physics同數底
都幾難睇得明本野
下下睇兩睇就要google

FAA? 其實本野寫得麻麻

真係，有 d 位有時寫到好虛
D 字又太 academic
但有時都 helpful 既

BAK應該比較好，深入淺出，但好似要上網訂實體書。

FAA嗰本可以用三版解釋一個concept，有一半以上係廢話，好處係唔洗錢

FAA? 其實本野寫得麻麻

真係，有 d 位有時寫到好虛
D 字又太 academic
但有時都 helpful 既

BAK應該比較好，深入淺出，但好似要上網訂實體書。

FAA嗰本可以用三版解釋一個concept，有一半以上係廢話，好處係唔洗錢

Cx 而加1A用FAA 出mc

真係，有 d 位有時寫到好虛
D 字又太 academic
但有時都 helpful 既

BAK應該比較好，深入淺出，但好似要上網訂實體書。

FAA嗰本可以用三版解釋一個concept，有一半以上係廢話，好處係唔洗錢

Cx 而加1A用FAA 出mc

咁FAA會好過佢自己本jki

BAK應該比較好，深入淺出，但好似要上網訂實體書。

FAA嗰本可以用三版解釋一個concept，有一半以上係廢話，好處係唔洗錢

Cx 而加1A用FAA 出mc

咁FAA會好過佢自己本jki

JKI 咪又係舊個本BAK 抽出來，不過佢個lift theory 係錯嘅

FAA? 其實本野寫得麻麻

真係，有 d 位有時寫到好虛
D 字又太 academic
但有時都 helpful 既

BAK應該比較好，深入淺出，但好似要上網訂實體書。

FAA嗰本可以用三版解釋一個concept，有一半以上係廢話，好處係唔洗錢

Met 直頭 dump 得

Faa d example 詳細有時好既 但真係可以實 d

Agree with BAK, solid n useful