skytest
要錢,有冇free software?
... 少少錢都唔肯比 叫你比錢去試飛咪更加唔洗諗
有無玩skytest既coordination test?我個個支針幾乎唔識跳,但係setting 已經校到好難,求教
邊個version 雖然唔覺得有關係
middle east, 其他方面都好好,係哩個好麻麻
巴打覺得有冇用?
有,抵買
skytest
要錢,有冇free software?
... 少少錢都唔肯比 叫你比錢去試飛咪更加唔洗諗
有無玩skytest既coordination test?我個個支針幾乎唔識跳,但係setting 已經校到好難,求教
邊個version 雖然唔覺得有關係
middle east, 其他方面都好好,係哩個好麻麻
巴打覺得有冇用?
有冇巴打知道lift generation有冇定論?
有啲人話bernoulli principles + equal time assumption係錯嘅
有啲人又話啱
乜你諗到咁深奧
Moving air + different pressure on top and below the aerofoil 咪算
你咁樣又好似簡單咗啲喎
個different pressure係因為咩?
空氣流動速度越快氣壓越低,反之亦然
但點解upper wing surface會快過lower wing surface?
以前學 upper wing 個curvature大啲,因為上下方嘅air要meet at trailing edge at the same time所以upper wing surface嘅空氣流動速度快啲
但好似好多人都話equal time 個assumption唔啱...
Equal time assumption 一定係錯 咁解釋唔到點解symetric airfoil 會有lift
但係symetric airfoil喺AOA=0 deg 係冇lift ga bor
有冇巴打知道lift generation有冇定論?
有啲人話bernoulli principles + equal time assumption係錯嘅
有啲人又話啱
乜你諗到咁深奧
Moving air + different pressure on top and below the aerofoil 咪算
你咁樣又好似簡單咗啲喎
個different pressure係因為咩?
空氣流動速度越快氣壓越低,反之亦然
但點解upper wing surface會快過lower wing surface?
以前學 upper wing 個curvature大啲,因為上下方嘅air要meet at trailing edge at the same time所以upper wing surface嘅空氣流動速度快啲
但好似好多人都話equal time 個assumption唔啱...
Equal time assumption 一定係錯 咁解釋唔到點解symetric airfoil 會有lift
但係symetric airfoil喺AOA=0 deg 係冇lift ga bor
Angel of attack =/= angel of incidence
有冇巴打知道lift generation有冇定論?
有啲人話bernoulli principles + equal time assumption係錯嘅
有啲人又話啱
乜你諗到咁深奧
Moving air + different pressure on top and below the aerofoil 咪算
你咁樣又好似簡單咗啲喎
個different pressure係因為咩?
空氣流動速度越快氣壓越低,反之亦然
但點解upper wing surface會快過lower wing surface?
以前學 upper wing 個curvature大啲,因為上下方嘅air要meet at trailing edge at the same time所以upper wing surface嘅空氣流動速度快啲
但好似好多人都話equal time 個assumption唔啱...
Equal time assumption 一定係錯 咁解釋唔到點解symetric airfoil 會有lift
但係symetric airfoil喺AOA=0 deg 係冇lift ga bor
Angel of attack =/= angel of incidence
sorry 唔明,同angle of incidence 有關係?
有冇巴打知道lift generation有冇定論?
有啲人話bernoulli principles + equal time assumption係錯嘅
有啲人又話啱
乜你諗到咁深奧
Moving air + different pressure on top and below the aerofoil 咪算
你咁樣又好似簡單咗啲喎
個different pressure係因為咩?
空氣流動速度越快氣壓越低,反之亦然
但點解upper wing surface會快過lower wing surface?
以前學 upper wing 個curvature大啲,因為上下方嘅air要meet at trailing edge at the same time所以upper wing surface嘅空氣流動速度快啲
但好似好多人都話equal time 個assumption唔啱...
有無人知因航而家係咪ban哂考過一次以上嘅人?我同另一個考過一次嘅friend上個月報咗到而家都無回音,相反未考過嘅人一報就一個月內有得1A
想問下apply 咗超過一個月都冇email係咪收得皮
已經唔係物唔物理既問題
係連邏輯有冇都成問題, 好難救
膠都廢事俾,由頭到尾淨係得你自己講唔係讀理科就Pass唔到gfs written, 依家我就同你講唔係,事實上份野大部份都係簡單maths加計下時間。e.g唔同time zone搵返flight time.所以先顯出咁都覺得難就唔適合做機師
根住你自己就話好多機師都係文科出身 都唔知你講乜勁。
最後想話你知,好多人fail written係因為第二份卷,即係matrix考邏輯個份
利申year 2個陣得閑得滯去左考,冇prep過in去到leadership assessment
請教各位,點解個L/D ratio點計到呢條線出黎
Coefficient of lift / coefficient of drag
除左L/D計到10之外,其他點畫到條線出黎
請教各位,點解個L/D ratio點計到呢條線出黎
Coefficient of lift / coefficient of drag
除左L/D計到10之外,其他點畫到條線出黎
?咪每一個點 CL/CD 計出黎
定你問點知CL同CD
請教各位,點解個L/D ratio點計到呢條線出黎
Coefficient of lift / coefficient of drag
除左L/D計到10之外,其他點畫到條線出黎
?咪每一個點 CL/CD 計出黎
定你問點知CL同CD
我想知個lift drag ratio每點計出黎同個圖既線點解唔同
同埋兩個coefficient係同AOA有關?
係點計出黎
Thanks 巴打
請教各位,點解個L/D ratio點計到呢條線出黎
Coefficient of lift / coefficient of drag
除左L/D計到10之外,其他點畫到條線出黎
?咪每一個點 CL/CD 計出黎
定你問點知CL同CD
我想知個lift drag ratio每點計出黎同個圖既線點解唔同
同埋兩個coefficient係同AOA有關?
係點計出黎
Thanks 巴打