我自己睇左兩個月書,仲睇緊FAA handbook
有d野都唔係好明,有無人一齊討論下tech野?
1. 點解load factor會increase stall speed?
2. 點解conventional winglet more efficient during climbing?
求高手解答
另外有無人知CX無左FG之後個新test係咪姐係KA既compass test?
CX冇左FG咩?
KA 個COMPASS TEST好易咋喎
CX冇左FG咩?
KA 個COMPASS TEST好易咋喎
CX冇左FG咩?
KA 個COMPASS TEST好易咋喎
轉左computer based test
但我無識人做過
CX冇左FG咩?
KA 個COMPASS TEST好易咋喎
KA打機唔係出名難咩
CX冇左FG咩?
KA 個COMPASS TEST好易咋喎
轉左computer based test
但我無識人做過
應該係fly into the box 個ex飛十次加multitasking
不過過到stage 2先諗啦
CX冇左FG咩?
KA 個COMPASS TEST好易咋喎
KA打機唔係出名難咩
MULTI TASKING 難唔難睇人架姐
比cx但都係易
我當年考係拎滿分, 近乎0MISS
KA打機唔係出名難咩
MULTI TASKING 難唔難睇人架姐
比cx但都係易
我當年考係拎滿分, 近乎0MISS
Ap test 7 成分都pass 第一關無分別
KA打機唔係出名難咩
MULTI TASKING 難唔難睇人架姐
比cx但都係易
我當年考係拎滿分, 近乎0MISS
Ap test 7 成分都pass 第一關無分別
Ap test 7 成分都pass 第一關無分別
KA第一關唔知仲係咪個兩份卷 可以背埋答案入去考
KA第一關唔知仲係咪個兩份卷 可以背埋答案入去考
個班西HR 一年先請幾個 係度話candidate 唔夠班
呢度係咪個個人都已經飛緊
KA第一關唔知仲係咪個兩份卷 可以背埋答案入去考
個班西HR 一年先請幾個 係度話candidate 唔夠班
嗰班on9 HR
我自己睇左兩個月書,仲睇緊FAA handbook
有d野都唔係好明,有無人一齊討論下tech野?
1. 點解load factor會increase stall speed?
2. 點解conventional winglet more efficient during climbing?
求高手解答
另外有無人知CX無左FG之後個新test係咪姐係KA既compass test?
我自己睇左兩個月書,仲睇緊FAA handbook
有d野都唔係好明,有無人一齊討論下tech野?
1. 點解load factor會increase stall speed?
2. 點解conventional winglet more efficient during climbing?
求高手解答
另外有無人知CX無左FG之後個新test係咪姐係KA既compass test?
I think:
A
1. Higher load factor can be regarded as plane is "heavier"
2. Higher lift is needed for the plane to keep alt
3. Higher stall speed is needed
B
1. Winglet reduces wingtip vortices
2. Hence induced drag is lower
3. "Thrust - smaller drag " so efficiency is improved
差唔多 timeline 一齊交流下
我又問條問題交流下
" How CG affects stall speed? "
我自己睇左兩個月書,仲睇緊FAA handbook
有d野都唔係好明,有無人一齊討論下tech野?
1. 點解load factor會increase stall speed?
2. 點解conventional winglet more efficient during climbing?
求高手解答
另外有無人知CX無左FG之後個新test係咪姐係KA既compass test?
I think:
A
1. Higher load factor can be regarded as plane is "heavier"
2. Higher lift is needed for the plane to keep alt
3. Higher stall speed is needed
B
1. Winglet reduces wingtip vortices
2. Hence induced drag is lower
3. "Thrust - smaller drag " so efficiency is improved
差唔多 timeline 一齊交流下
我又問條問題交流下
" How CG affects stall speed? "
終於有人真係答問題
2.其實係想compare raked wingtip vs conventional winglet
一個more efficient during cruising 一個more efficient on climbing
所以用係extra long haul vs mid long haul
3. 我覺得cg愈後,stall speed愈高
因為架機more tendency to pitch up?
I think:
A
1. Higher load factor can be regarded as plane is "heavier"
2. Higher lift is needed for the plane to keep alt
3. Higher stall speed is needed
B
1. Winglet reduces wingtip vortices
2. Hence induced drag is lower
3. "Thrust - smaller drag " so efficiency is improved
差唔多 timeline 一齊交流下
我又問條問題交流下
" How CG affects stall speed? "
終於有人真係答問題
2.其實係想compare raked wingtip vs conventional winglet
一個more efficient during cruising 一個more efficient on climbing
所以用係extra long haul vs mid long haul
3. 我覺得cg愈後,stall speed愈高
因為架機more tendency to pitch up?
掉轉左 cg越前 stall speed越高 畫下force diagram 就知
終於有人真係答問題
2.其實係想compare raked wingtip vs conventional winglet
一個more efficient during cruising 一個more efficient on climbing
所以用係extra long haul vs mid long haul
3. 我覺得cg愈後,stall speed愈高
因為架機more tendency to pitch up?
掉轉左 cg越前 stall speed越高 畫下force diagram 就知
我就咁諗
Cg後既話Lift個moment arm短左
Anti clockwise moment細左
所以less tendency pitch down?
我自己睇左兩個月書,仲睇緊FAA handbook
有d野都唔係好明,有無人一齊討論下tech野?
1. 點解load factor會increase stall speed?
2. 點解conventional winglet more efficient during climbing?
求高手解答
另外有無人知CX無左FG之後個新test係咪姐係KA既compass test?
I think:
A
1. Higher load factor can be regarded as plane is "heavier"
2. Higher lift is needed for the plane to keep alt
3. Higher stall speed is needed
B
1. Winglet reduces wingtip vortices
2. Hence induced drag is lower
3. "Thrust - smaller drag " so efficiency is improved
差唔多 timeline 一齊交流下
我又問條問題交流下
" How CG affects stall speed? "