如果佢琴日未sd,當佢今日辦公時間之後先sd
就係香港時間下晝5點打後
如果今晚臨訓前都未有就自求多福啦
『薪火post』BNO 續期資訊(23) 連登首家BNO教學網站上線了
az-687
1001 回覆
82 Like
4 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
你試下今日下晝5點後再check下
如果佢琴日未sd,當佢今日辦公時間之後先sd
就係香港時間下晝5點打後
如果今晚臨訓前都未有就自求多福啦
如果佢琴日未sd,當佢今日辦公時間之後先sd
就係香港時間下晝5點打後
如果今晚臨訓前都未有就自求多福啦
8/9 咁就難D了
原本無諗過hmpo噉快手就搞掂
睇黎要係台灣入清比我既網址
睇黎要係台灣入清比我既網址
其實可以用application number去搵個兩個tracking number
唔一定要等sms(前題係dhl知有呢份件)
How do I track my items?
You will need your passport application reference number which was given to you during the application process and which can be found on the email we sent you.
Track your items
You must enter the passport application reference number into the field where you are asked for the “Shipper’s Reference”. Please note that if your passport application reference number begins with the letters ‘PEX’ you will need to exclude these first three letters when entering your number.
Where it states “Date range for shipment – From” please enter the approximate date you applied for your passport.
The system will show tracking information for the items linked with your passport application. Each item (passport and supporting documents) will be listed under its unique tracking number (Waybill number). You'll need this number if you want to reschedule your delivery.
https://www.logistics.dhl/gb-en/home/our-divisions/global-forwarding/customer-service/hmpo-delivery-services.html
自己啪落去睇睇啦
唔一定要等sms(前題係dhl知有呢份件)
How do I track my items?
You will need your passport application reference number which was given to you during the application process and which can be found on the email we sent you.
Track your items
You must enter the passport application reference number into the field where you are asked for the “Shipper’s Reference”. Please note that if your passport application reference number begins with the letters ‘PEX’ you will need to exclude these first three letters when entering your number.
Where it states “Date range for shipment – From” please enter the approximate date you applied for your passport.
The system will show tracking information for the items linked with your passport application. Each item (passport and supporting documents) will be listed under its unique tracking number (Waybill number). You'll need this number if you want to reschedule your delivery.
https://www.logistics.dhl/gb-en/home/our-divisions/global-forwarding/customer-service/hmpo-delivery-services.html
自己啪落去睇睇啦
Liverpool BNO passport team send email 比我叫我forward 副署人既passport details page copy 比佢, 我send 返個attached 比佢但冇email 再黎是否運作正常？
睇下個網有冇update囉
好多公司同政府部門都好鍾意唔reply
好多公司同政府部門都好鍾意唔reply
之前歐遊，本野乜印都冇，最後係荷蘭走個IO問我你依本oversea黎架喎，點解乜印都冇，我就開電話攞野啲火車飛丫，巴士飛佢睇，佢俾另一個IO係間房吸左個印就放左我走
有申根residence permit, munich入有印
今個星期oslo出返祖國試下先
今個星期oslo出返祖國試下先
Thanks 
等多幾日睇下佢有冇轉status / email先
等多幾日睇下佢有冇轉status / email先
英國人畀幾多麻煩人
Bno 入英國係咪應該冇印
我入個時冇，之後坐Euro star去比利時都冇，比利時之後全坐巴士，境都唔洗過，又冇
我入個時冇，之後坐Euro star去比利時都冇，比利時之後全坐巴士，境都唔洗過，又冇
BNO入英國一定有
岩岩check多次，真係冇 淨係得荷蘭既岀入境印
淨係得荷蘭既岀入境印
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/six-monthly-report-on-hong-kong-january-to-june-2018
中國女婿第一份report出爐啦
果然冇令大家失望
衰過以前好多
咁係佢吸漏比你喇
佢識分
英國個IO乜都冇問過我 ，我女朋友用火車頭，都係問佢係咪等一次黎英國，吸左個印就放左我地走
，我女朋友用火車頭，都係問佢係咪等一次黎英國，吸左個印就放左我地走INTERNATIONAL REPORTS
A number of reports on Hong Kong were published during the reporting period. In 2018, Freedom House continued to rate Hong Kong as only “partly free” for political rights and civil liberties. The US-based Heritage Foundation rated Hong Kong the world’s freest economy for the 24th year running, but warned of political interference from the mainland in recent years.
The report said:
“the ‘One Country, Two Systems’ policy has been strained by PRC political interference in recent years, but Hong Kong’s open and market-driven economy continues to flourish, increasingly integrated with the mainland through trade, tourism, and financial links.
The judiciary is independent, but Beijing reserves the right to make final constitutional interpretations, effectively limiting the power of Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal.”
The US State Department Hong Kong Policy Act Report was published on 29 May. It concluded that certain actions by the Chinese Central Government during the period covered by their report were inconsistent with China’s commitment in the Basic Law to allow Hong Kong to exercise a high degree of autonomy. Overall, it found that Hong Kong still generally maintained a high degree of autonomy under ‘One Country, Two Systems’ in most areas.
The report also said that the Hong Kong SAR Chief Executive had rejected a US fugitive surrender request made in October 2017 at the behest of the Chinese Central Government and had subsequently released the detainee into Central Government custody on the basis it was pursuing a separate criminal action. The report noted this was the first such instance since the establishment of the SAR. The Chief Executive’s office refuted the claim, noting that in the absence of any extradition agreement between the Hong Kong SAR and the mainland, no surrender of any fugitive had ever been made to the mainland.
A number of reports on Hong Kong were published during the reporting period. In 2018, Freedom House continued to rate Hong Kong as only “partly free” for political rights and civil liberties. The US-based Heritage Foundation rated Hong Kong the world’s freest economy for the 24th year running, but warned of political interference from the mainland in recent years.
The report said:
“the ‘One Country, Two Systems’ policy has been strained by PRC political interference in recent years, but Hong Kong’s open and market-driven economy continues to flourish, increasingly integrated with the mainland through trade, tourism, and financial links.
The judiciary is independent, but Beijing reserves the right to make final constitutional interpretations, effectively limiting the power of Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal.”
The US State Department Hong Kong Policy Act Report was published on 29 May. It concluded that certain actions by the Chinese Central Government during the period covered by their report were inconsistent with China’s commitment in the Basic Law to allow Hong Kong to exercise a high degree of autonomy. Overall, it found that Hong Kong still generally maintained a high degree of autonomy under ‘One Country, Two Systems’ in most areas.
The report also said that the Hong Kong SAR Chief Executive had rejected a US fugitive surrender request made in October 2017 at the behest of the Chinese Central Government and had subsequently released the detainee into Central Government custody on the basis it was pursuing a separate criminal action. The report noted this was the first such instance since the establishment of the SAR. The Chief Executive’s office refuted the claim, noting that in the absence of any extradition agreement between the Hong Kong SAR and the mainland, no surrender of any fugitive had ever been made to the mainland.
竟然係出 odt 
之前係出開 PDF 㗎利申: 用緊 LibreOffice
中國女間諜並唔係流嘅!
咁佢WARN你咩，有咩後果先？
若果係禁止你再入星加坡，咁就無謂搏。
若果係禁止你再入星加坡，咁就無謂搏。