英國衛報：不應對持相反意見者私了

對家拎刀斬 我地只係拳頭。咁都唔得？

我地比人私了到斷手斷腳 之後打個小小就話我地影響國際戰線 咁有無諗過係英國佬太垃圾呢？

對家已經進化, 係直接掉手足落街

希望大家先看衛報原文
Protesters have also increasingly been physically attacking critics and people they accuse of being “mainland spies”.
它的意思是：抗議者也越來越多地對他們指責為“內地間諜”的人進行人身攻擊

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/28/hong-kong-cant-go-back-to-normal-protesters-keep-umbrella-spirit-alive

希望大家先看衛報原文
Protesters have also increasingly been physically attacking critics and people they accuse of being “mainland spies”.
它的意思是：抗議者也越來越多地對他們指責為“內地間諜”的人進行人身攻擊

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/28/hong-kong-cant-go-back-to-normal-protesters-keep-umbrella-spirit-alive

"暴"在哪裡？單單把我們的文宣撕掉不可能是“暴”吧。衛報沒有說她有進一步的暴力。

拉

標題黨+帶風向po就咪撚理啦

俾元朗721同尋晚個廢老推人落天橋條片佢睇 警方選擇性執法 講埋原告變被告

英國就係垃圾

推呢個
想知英國衛報會唔會9秒9去救人
唔係既就唔好懶係大愛咁

標題黨

掟番條廢物落去

未起到底

你想帶出咩意思?

樓主斷章取義想點
衛報quote一段嘢係話條八婆口口聲聲話言論自由，自己又走去撕連儂牆
仲有下面馬上衛報就寫：despite the violence, the protestors maintain broad public support

I have already twittered it at 12pm, but you can't use this to justify another problem
https://twitter.com/scf45279686/status/1178129428443881472

靠美國啦 重英國

樓主含撚啦