英國保守黨旗下政治團體Moggmentum表態支持香港歸英 (2)

理據就拎唔出，人身攻擊就有

When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.

When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.

有人死唔服氣，繼續用邏輯謬誤去詭辯囉

字都未識就返去小學重新讀過啦，人生攻擊

人哋點唔關我事，你有人身攻擊同時無拎理據係事實。事實就任何人都可以指出唔好玩“你也一樣”謬誤

你無拎理據就係無拎理據。當初你講時，根本唔你我問你。我只係指出你無理據，呢個並唔係問你問題。所以你而家只係為你無拎理據而轉移視線

請舉出理據

你反問人英國有咩義務收返香港，你就不斷死spin去利益。但講利益時又要無視他人理據

你當初捉我英文用字就得？

文盲嗰個係你，你邊忽拎出理據去指英國民主要流血？有人指出光榮革命。但你聲稱有其他，但無畀理據

無論我英文如何都好，咁咪證明你應返中學學過基本logic囉

殺人犯指殺人係錯，咁唔通殺人會變得無咁錯？

無，因為你的確未拎出理據
你拎出理據咪有第二句囉