[書蟲］你最近睇緊咩書？4
跳跳虎咩咩叫
1001 回覆
78 Like
4 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
剛睇完David Lynch導演自傳Room to Dream
易經
岩岩睇完衞斯理嘅蠱惑/再來一次
而家準備睇埋個半本when breathe becomes air
而家準備睇埋個半本when breathe becomes air
佢本書好睇啲定佢啲戲好睇啲?
推薦啊 令你反思好多你同物質以及社交既關係
佢本人有試過獨處兩星期入面都有講佢經歷
佢本人有試過獨處兩星期入面都有講佢經歷
有冇ching近擺睇緊 Greek's philosophy
利申:睇緊plato既Parmenides
利申:睇緊plato既Parmenides
我網購多
Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 7th edition
呢本係McKinsey 出的, 剛剛出到第7版
教公司估值方法, 睇左而又用左佢的方法, 你會知道與其不斷比較同類公司的PE同PS(冇耐之前我都係咁), 不如老老實實計佢估值來做投資決定,
唔咁樣做, 你永遠唔知一隻股票的intrinsic value, 一路都係會做唔好的決定.
就算覺得估值方法太深, 睇本書的Part 1, 你會清楚股票的價值由邊度黎.
呢本係McKinsey 出的, 剛剛出到第7版
教公司估值方法, 睇左而又用左佢的方法, 你會知道與其不斷比較同類公司的PE同PS(冇耐之前我都係咁), 不如老老實實計佢估值來做投資決定,
唔咁樣做, 你永遠唔知一隻股票的intrinsic value, 一路都係會做唔好的決定.
就算覺得估值方法太深, 睇本書的Part 1, 你會清楚股票的價值由邊度黎.
封面好靚
睇左8 份1 左右， 要讚既地方係作者幾有野心，真係唔同地方既獨立史既大事同經過都幾齊整，同埋唔係淨係鳩抄成書，係史觀同文筆統一梳理過先整理成一本書，好適合拎黎做導論，睇完之後對個別國家有興趣就去搵其他書深入研究
自己覺得麻麻既地方係作者個套左派史觀，佢本身左翼份子黎，變左本身個史觀就有d 不斷革命論既影子，對作者黎講階級鬥爭同民族解放係同樣重要，如果你係右派既話你應該睇到擰哂頭
（同埋接受唔到佢無講芬蘭獨立... 不過有立陶宛都可以收貨)
當然啦史觀呢樣就個人觀點與角度，但就返史實內容黎講我覺得係瑕不掩瑜，獨派手足應該買黎睇下
自己覺得麻麻既地方係作者個套左派史觀，佢本身左翼份子黎，變左本身個史觀就有d 不斷革命論既影子，對作者黎講階級鬥爭同民族解放係同樣重要，如果你係右派既話你應該睇到擰哂頭
（同埋接受唔到佢無講芬蘭獨立... 不過有立陶宛都可以收貨
)當然啦史觀呢樣就個人觀點與角度，但就返史實內容黎講我覺得係瑕不掩瑜，獨派手足應該買黎睇下
如果想學睇financial statement ， 分析公司表現，有咩書推介
輕輕一推
呢個你要自己揾，本身會計底
田園？序言
整係旺角都幾間
可以睇書係一件好幸福既事
尤其當你工作忙到嘔泡既時候
就會更加珍惜可以優閒睇書既時間
尤其當你工作忙到嘔泡既時候
就會更加珍惜可以優閒睇書既時間
有冇人睇過王曾才呢套世界現代史？？評價如何？
french revolution有無邊本推介
好彩碌咗入呢個post
啱啱睇緊西藏火鳳凰，正想搵關於西藏嘅書
啱啱睇緊西藏火鳳凰，正想搵關於西藏嘅書
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/wiki/books/europe#wiki_the_french_revolution_.26amp.3B_the_napoleonic_wars
利申我本身唔算睇得多法國大革命嘅嘢
叫做睇左大半 Peter McPhee嘅The French Revolution 1789–1799
有啲難啃
但係上網見到似乎已經係易入口嘅書
另外樓上巴打講到William Doyle本French Revolution都係常見嘅推薦，屬於Revisionist一派（用馬克思主義角度研究 法國大革命係正統；後來從其他角度研究嗰啲就叫revisionist，因為係挑戰緊舊有觀點）
不過我睇左頭幾頁就覺得好悶
呢兩本書畀我嘅感覺都係無咩narrative
McPhee佢本書都有延伸閱讀嘅書單，我一陣copy落黎 作為參考（不過我試過上gen lib搵，好多都搵唔到；所以搵黎睇都有啲煩）
唔知算唔算拋磚引玉
多謝ching推介睇下reddit有咩好書推介先
睇下reddit有咩好書推介先話說法國大革命嘅書真係汗牛充棟
基本上你想像到嘅topic都有研究
稍為整理左一下
以下書單引用自 Peter McPhee, The French Revolution 1789–1799
次序可能有改變
A Guide to Further Reading in English
革命前、十八世紀法國社會面貌
The best introduction to eighteenth-century France is Daniel Roche, France in the Enlightenment, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Cambridge, Mass., 1998).
An enormous amount may be learned about French society as a whole from
John McManners, Church and Society in Eighteenth-Century France, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1998).
Local studies permit a closer approach to French society; among them are
Robert Forster, The Nobility of Toulouse in the Eighteenth Century (Baltimore, 1971), and
The House of Saulx-Tavanes: Versailles and Burgundy 1700–1830 (Baltimore, 1977);
Daniel Roche, The People of Paris: An Essay in Popular Culture in the 18th Century, trans. Marie Evans (Berkeley, Calif., 1987);
Thomas Sheppard, Lourmarin in the Eighteenth Century: A Study of a French Village (Baltimore, 1971);
Olwen Hufton, Bayeux in the Late Eighteenth Century: A Social Study (Oxford, 1967);
John McManners, French Ecclesiastical Society under the Ancien Régime (Manchester, 1960); Patrice Higonnet, Pont-de-Montvert: Social Structure and Politics in a French Village, 1700– 1914 (Cambridge, Mass., 1971), and
Liana Vardi, The Land and the Loom: Peasants and Profit in Northern France 1680–1800 (Durham, NC, 1993).
The crucial roles of women in household work strategies are discussed in
Olwen Hufton’s important The Prospect before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, 1500–1800 (New York, 1996).
革命之起源
Debates on the origins of the Revolution are summarized from a non- Marxist or ‘revisionist’ perspective in
William Doyle, Origins of the French Revolution, 2nd edn. (Oxford, 1980),
while Colin Jones synthesizes a mass of recent research into an effective riposte in
Colin Lucas (ed.), Rewriting the French Revolution (Oxford, 1991).
The continuity of attempts at reform is stressed by
Peter Jones, Reform and Revolution in France: The Politics of Transition, 1774–1791 (Cambridge, 1995).
Increasing attention has been paid to the cultural origins of the Revolution, well summarized in
Roger Chartier, The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution (Durham, NC, 1991);
Emmet Kennedy, A Cultural History of the French Revolution (New Haven, 1989); and the deservedly influential work of
Robert Darnton, The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History (New York, 1984), and
The Literary Underground of the Old Regime (Cambridge, Mass., 1982).
對革命歷史嘅唔同敘事理解
Forty years after its publication in French, the classic Marxist narrative by
Albert Soboul, The French Revolution 1787–1799: From the Storming of the Bastille to Napoleon, trans. Alan Forrest and Colin Jones (London, 1989)
remains a powerful, cohesive analysis.
Very different in tone is the detailed political history by
William Doyle, The Oxford History of the French Revolution (Oxford, 1989); here international affairs and counter-revolution are properly emphasized.
基本上你想像到嘅topic都有研究
稍為整理左一下
以下書單引用自 Peter McPhee, The French Revolution 1789–1799
次序可能有改變
A Guide to Further Reading in English
革命前、十八世紀法國社會面貌
The best introduction to eighteenth-century France is Daniel Roche, France in the Enlightenment, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Cambridge, Mass., 1998).
An enormous amount may be learned about French society as a whole from
John McManners, Church and Society in Eighteenth-Century France, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1998).
Local studies permit a closer approach to French society; among them are
Robert Forster, The Nobility of Toulouse in the Eighteenth Century (Baltimore, 1971), and
The House of Saulx-Tavanes: Versailles and Burgundy 1700–1830 (Baltimore, 1977);
Daniel Roche, The People of Paris: An Essay in Popular Culture in the 18th Century, trans. Marie Evans (Berkeley, Calif., 1987);
Thomas Sheppard, Lourmarin in the Eighteenth Century: A Study of a French Village (Baltimore, 1971);
Olwen Hufton, Bayeux in the Late Eighteenth Century: A Social Study (Oxford, 1967);
John McManners, French Ecclesiastical Society under the Ancien Régime (Manchester, 1960); Patrice Higonnet, Pont-de-Montvert: Social Structure and Politics in a French Village, 1700– 1914 (Cambridge, Mass., 1971), and
Liana Vardi, The Land and the Loom: Peasants and Profit in Northern France 1680–1800 (Durham, NC, 1993).
The crucial roles of women in household work strategies are discussed in
Olwen Hufton’s important The Prospect before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, 1500–1800 (New York, 1996).
革命之起源
Debates on the origins of the Revolution are summarized from a non- Marxist or ‘revisionist’ perspective in
William Doyle, Origins of the French Revolution, 2nd edn. (Oxford, 1980),
while Colin Jones synthesizes a mass of recent research into an effective riposte in
Colin Lucas (ed.), Rewriting the French Revolution (Oxford, 1991).
The continuity of attempts at reform is stressed by
Peter Jones, Reform and Revolution in France: The Politics of Transition, 1774–1791 (Cambridge, 1995).
Increasing attention has been paid to the cultural origins of the Revolution, well summarized in
Roger Chartier, The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution (Durham, NC, 1991);
Emmet Kennedy, A Cultural History of the French Revolution (New Haven, 1989); and the deservedly influential work of
Robert Darnton, The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History (New York, 1984), and
The Literary Underground of the Old Regime (Cambridge, Mass., 1982).
對革命歷史嘅唔同敘事理解
Forty years after its publication in French, the classic Marxist narrative by
Albert Soboul, The French Revolution 1787–1799: From the Storming of the Bastille to Napoleon, trans. Alan Forrest and Colin Jones (London, 1989)
remains a powerful, cohesive analysis.
Very different in tone is the detailed political history by
William Doyle, The Oxford History of the French Revolution (Oxford, 1989); here international affairs and counter-revolution are properly emphasized.