量子糾纏是咪足以證明世界係虛擬？

其實唔係“觀察”令到有其他形態出現？只係“觀察”依個動作本身影響左佢個運作方法

樓主睇睇李永樂先啦

https://youtu.be/DChflCeVYHA?si=fvJFvdHNIydOs2kq

我想表達人對一樣未知既野覺得神奇既程度啫…同埋未必唔一樣架 可能個原理好相似 只係未有人探測同研究到 除非你解釋到係咩原理 否則你點肯定係唔同呢

又係呢種以為自己好撚勁既人

唔係互相影響喎
只係你觀察完一粒就知道另一粒個spin

點樣先學到念力 突破極限

Deep too deep

1+1=2
世界由0開始，邊度黎1?

你問Ironman

好正

依個po係咪可以盡情9up？

Holographic principle話明Spacetime只係2d 平面嘅投影
世界唔係虛擬
但實際上只係2d

你勁能癲 去屌人老母行撚咗三個維度

係 如果你而家去自殺
仲有另一個你生存緊

好似無咗wave pattern係因為雙縫兩邊互相抵消咗

Physics Essays


“In 2003, the journal published a paper describing Randell Mills' hydrino theory, which is both at odds with quantum mechanics and widely rejected by physicists.[7][8] In 2004, the journal published an author from Himachal Pradesh who claimed to prove that the usual mathematical expression of mass-energy equivalence was not valid in general, a claim he said was being ignored by the wider scientific community.[9][10] In 2017, the journal published an article from an amateur physicist who claimed to redefine the elementary charge and eliminate the fine structure constant, directly in contradiction to mainstream physics.[11]”

其實「觀察」呢個行為係咪有limitation，冇辦法透過「觀察」去了解某d物理現象，要靠高維度既思維去了解。

呢個解釋雙縫實驗講得幾好, 佢subject 好似content farm, 但內容唔係9up

https://youtu.be/wcwDmvkyNLU?si=HetyCNsimhJIei9I

如果知道實驗內容, 睇最後幾分鐘結論就得.

光喺雙縫實驗係會以波嘅形式觀察到 光電效應下就會以粒子被觀察到先啱

1只係人創造嘅概念，一個極簡表述某種意義嘅載體。