［冇圖］睇左好多年聖經 你問我答（8）

唔好講埋啲假大空嘅廢話
正正經經回應下

咁你揀一個例子出黎

彼得點用希臘文寫彼得後書？

跳樓會死，信耶穌會生。

約翰福音10:7-18
//7 所以耶穌又說：「我實實在在告訴你們，我是羊的門。 8 凡在我以前*來的，都是賊，是強盜，羊卻不聽他們。 9 我就是門，人若經過我而進來，必得安全，*可以進來出去，找到草場。 10 賊人來，無非要偷，要宰，要毀壞；我來了，是要使牠們得生命，並且得的更豐盛。 11 我是好牧人，好牧人為羊捨棄生命。 12 雇工不是牧人，羊不是他自己的；看見狼來，他就丟下羊羣逃跑，狼就抓住牠們，趕散牠們； 13 因為那人是雇工，並不關心羊羣。 14 我是好牧人，我認識我的羊，我的羊也認識我， 15 就像父認識我，我也認識父一樣；並且我為羊捨棄生命。 16 我還有別的羊，不屬這個羊圈的，我必須把牠們領來；牠們也要聽我的聲音，並且要合成一羣，同屬一個牧人。 17 父愛我，因為我把生命捨棄，好再次取回來。 18 沒有誰能奪去我的生命，是我自己捨棄的。我既有權捨棄，也有權再取回來。這是我從我父那裏所接受的命令。」//

有心討論既就唔會一段經文都唔引咁話聖經有矛盾。

你唔係信緊耶穌的教導

條link入面有經文

點解黎巴仲有心機同隻人肉錄音機玩

邊句講明彼得隻手落筆？

我係信緊神既教導，所以都係耶穌既教導

揀一段啦咁多

新post 可能有新人睇，唔知佢係人肉錄音機，比個機會佢表明身份

There exist a number of possibilities whereby Peter could have been the source of the epistles attributed to him without directly writing them. The "secretary" hypothesis is the most common of these, that Peter either dictated to a literate associate or perhaps even just summarized the gist of his thoughts while the secretary turned it into a proper Greek letter. In one version of this, Peter did learn spoken Greek, but dictated the letters to a secretary capable of writing Greek. This still assumes a truly impressive leap in education for Peter late in his life; the epistle 1 Peter is in fluent Greek and the author well acquainted with the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament.

Another version that assumes less of Peter is that he dictated in Aramaic, while the secretary translated to Greek. An issue against this possibility is that the letters do not show signs of Aramaic speech patterns turned into Greek ones; if this occurred, then the secretary modified the message sufficiently well to turn the passage into Greek idiom and style rather than Aramaic idiom and style. Another raised possibility is that a Greek-writing associate of Peter was summarizing his general thoughts yet essentially writing the letter themselves. Finally, it is possible that the author was a disciple of Peter who wrote later in Peter's honor, especially if the date of composition is believed to be well after Peter's death (such as 2 Peter). The issue with the final two is that the letters directly identify themselves as being directly from Peter; if a coauthor was involved, the letters would be more properly identified as coming from the coauthor under Peter's guidance or inspiration. Additionally, for the final possibility of a disciple writing in Peter's honor, any proof that such an unknown author indeed knew Peter closely, rather than simply giving his own personal views to Peter, has long since vanished.[18]

你唔係信緊耶穌的教導

你話我唔引經文但條link有經文
你係唔係作假見證？

你想知我點睇就揀一段，咁就一齊睇一段。
唔想知既話，我回應呢部分係咁多。
我聽耶穌既教導，因為我聽保羅既教導。

點解唔敢回應「你話我唔引經文但條link有經文
你係唔係作假見證？」

你又引到我笑，多謝你搞氣氛

以笑掩蓋邪惡行為？

箴言19:5
//作假見證的，必不免受罰；吐出謊言的，終不能逃脫。//

你同唔同意？

咁你即係承認自己作假見證但同偷錢一樣有「恩典」不會被定罪？

我想知你講「假見證」係咪引用緊聖經先，大家講緊同一樣野先有得討論

咩啊 耶穌under玉帝，緊係聽玉帝話

咩啊 大家發現玉帝先係真神

原來呢個係你既發現，多謝分享