Amber Turd VS Johnny Depp 最新戰況 (9) We love you Johnny

1001 回覆
136 Like 3 Dislike
2022-06-01 17:26:57
at 話 jd sv,如果呢樣野係誹謗,一個正常人都會覺得jd 名譽點會都有受損掛,唔一定要證明收入受損?
2022-06-01 17:27:56
見到佢後來日日都出幾條片時已經唔想睇
唔怪得有人話官司完左好機車就失業
2022-06-01 17:29:44

source: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22040933-johnny-depp-amber-heard-full-verdict-form

Question 1, 2, 3 係拆散3項 statement 問返 instruction 個啲問題
應該要3項中晒先得?
2022-06-01 17:34:21
按照以上source去理解咁應該要3項statement 中晒先得
2022-06-01 17:34:28
其中一句中都已經入到
2022-06-01 17:34:33
Disney派出嚟果個只係無權參與選角決定嘅中層員工,話冇aware篇文有對JD有冇得繼續做Jack Sparrow有影響

所以其實唔可以話段證供完全冇用,但又唔係決定性(因為佢只係話唔佢唔覺,而佢又唔係大粒到好似WB果個咁真係有分落決定,可以實牙實齒話唔關事),應該都係睇Jury睇得幾重
2022-06-01 17:35:28
jury instruction個日個judge講左任何一句中都可以去Q 4同5
2022-06-01 17:41:57
我都覺呢個位寫得有啲亂,但我諗緊Jury instruction No.FF係咪有解到呢點
我對No.FF既理解:- 假設唔係全部中晒/否定晒3項statement,Jury要考慮晒成單case (包括成篇op ed同其他呈堂證供) as in Totality of Facts,從而作出裁決;the same thing applies to AH's countersuit

Defamatory Meaning: Consideration of the Publication as a Whole
In determining whether any of the statements in the op-ed are false and defamatory as to Mr. Depp, you must read the statements in the context of the op-ed as a whole. This means you may not seize on any one word, phrase, or image, or consider only one particular statement, phrase, or passage in isolation.
In determining whether any of Mr. Waldman's statements are false and defamatory. you must read those statements in context as a whole. This means you may not seize on any one word, phrase, or image, or consider only one particular statement, phrase, or passage in isolation.
2022-06-01 17:42:39
按照judge咁講 第一項statement令JD告得入既成功率最高
2022-06-01 17:43:54
TMZ前員工好關鍵,基本上link哂所有嘢
2022-06-01 17:52:49
係喎, 佢係寫answered YES to all of questions 1, 2 OR 3
仲諗緊中晒3個咁難點做
2022-06-01 17:52:57
Question 1, 2 or 3
即係其中一項
2022-06-01 17:54:15
In any case JD 都有著數
癲婆認 -> 自爆可能輸
唔認 -> 等如澄清JD冇打佢
2022-06-01 17:56:05
諗起生性病標題
2022-06-01 17:56:50
屌 依家先望到個OR字
2022-06-01 17:58:48
AH 最尾講明出黎反對JD "Power"
2022-06-01 18:03:52
JD 既律師都知其實難打
所以JD要求直播
我諗佢本人都有打定輸數
比全世界睇下個閪婆同女權先係佢目的
2022-06-01 18:04:36
https://youtu.be/YsdpQFgspbM?t=195
FC'ed, 補link
咁No.FF應該單純講緊睇每一條statement Jury應考慮前文後理,但第一項statement=Title
呢項法官澄清真係好重要下
2022-06-01 18:09:28
如果真係限死個範圍係條statement 裡面
即係AH自己限死左abuse 嘅範疇係SV
咁JD隨時有得打喎
2022-06-01 18:09:42


Johnny is a powerful man, that’s why I write the op-ed.

佢真係同自己律師過唔去。
仲同camile 拗證物
2022-06-01 18:09:51
係囉我仲認緊邊有可能3項中晒 如果係咁大家都唔洗等結果 輸硬
2022-06-01 18:13:51


https://youtu.be/YsdpQFgspbM?t=195

FC'ed, 補link
咁No.FF應該單純講緊睇每一條statement Jury應考慮前文後理,但第一項statement=Title
呢項法官澄清真係好重要下
係囉我仲緊邊有可能3項中晒 如果係咁大家都唔洗等結果 輸硬
2022-06-01 18:15:12
正常我哋冇subscribe 根本睇唔到內文,咁緊係告subject

Pledge vs Donated

等如你打電話去歡樂滿東華話捐$10000,但成年都冇去銀行入數
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞