Amber Turd VS Johnny Depp 最新戰況 (9) We love you Johnny

睇過佢幾條片
好似話佢一開始都唔睇好
但JD rebuttal 上stand個日佢係現場
佢話現場睇JD真係好有感染力
所以個下開始覺得JD勝算應該高

而家個問題係掉轉
個標題寫到明sexual violence
反而內容寫得含糊好多，淨係話domestic abuse

咁所以如果話refer個標題，啲jury只要相信JD冇sexual abuse過AH就夠形成誹謗，唔駛再爭拗verbal abuse計唔計，JD鬧AH時口臭算唔算abuse之類嘅問題

judge 講到明俾 jury 知，要了解AH 出oped 嘅意圖，係咪針對JD , 如果係, 咁樣先可以判JD win , 所以JD win 並不是容易

條友啲料好多流，好嘩眾取寵想吸fans

應該係JD legal team指明係個headline defame佢
因為真係零證據JD有sexual violence

佢話啲jury大部分明顯對AH成條team連證人極度不耐煩
當我哋見到AH瘋狂眼神攻擊啲jury時，基本上佢哋全部（包括AH集中攻擊嘅#4 #5兩個女嘅）都頂唔順冇望佢，有啲直情凳都轉埋去全程對住Camille

因為內文佢好小心咁冇提到JD sexual abuse 佢

Amber Heard: I spoke up against sexual violence—and faced our culture's wrath, That has to change.”

I was exposed to abuse at a very young age. I knew certain things early on, without ever having to be told. I knew that men have the power — physically, socially and financially — and that a lot of institutions support that arrangement. I knew this long before I had the words to articulate it, and I bet you learned it young, too.

Like many women, I had been harassed and sexually assaulted by the time I was of college age. But I kept quiet — I did not expect filing complaints to bring justice. And I didn’t see myself as a victim.

Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out.

AH Team 想用內文第二段argue sexual abuse 唔係講緊JD
JD Team 想話文章標題足夠令讀者以為JD 係sexual abuser
法官釐清jury 只需要考慮標題有冇誹謗
啫係話標題黨都會告得入

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8QoKbhRyH4
DUI guy 5 second of fame

我明喇
下面係instruction, Jury問緊page 6, No. C, 第3
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-jury-instructions.pdf

No. C只係針對"I spoke against sexual violence..."依句 (後面會分開睇埋其他)
咁岩"I spoke against..."係篇文title, 所以Jury問清楚依part係講緊依句, 定成篇
所以法官答淨係睇依句

最後at 已經認咗篇內文係講jd ,話佢好有men power同認自己寫,再加上標題話性虐待, 應該斷正即啪啦
common sense 上冇理由可以話唔關jd 事

補埋片
https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork/status/1531695277303906304

其實只要佢話篇文唔係佢寫，佢鳩up
或者話篇文針對舊男友

係佢自己抵唔住頸最後玩自爆

有裁決未？

好多人都等緊
好緊張

但都要Jury 聽得出，記得佢最後唔小心自爆嘅時候係同JD 律師疊晒聲，Jury 又無得好似我地咁樣replay

Jury手頭上有法庭入面任何講過嘅野嘅文字紀錄
應該可以搵返出嚟

咁可唔可以Think in this way
Title寫嘅係"I spoke up against sexual violence" 主題係SV
而AT已經親口承認篇文係指JD 即係標題都明顯Referring to JD
但係庭上冇任何證據表明JD有性侵佢
只要再Prove到呢篇文令JD名譽受損＋收入減少 咁誹謗罪就成立

其實Jury禮拜二向法官clarify第3題(is this statement false)
代表已經答左第1 2題(係咪Turd寫，係咪講緊JD)係yes

我既理解係咁

本身我諗住jd 係一定輸因為要睇埋內文，只要有任何一單暴力事件已經足以證明不是defamation

但原來淨係針對title, 而title 只係講左sv, 而非任何形式既暴力

所有證詞中，只有ah 聲稱既用酒樽插西事件係同性侵有關，而呢單野係完全無任何證據

所以只要證明因為呢篇文而導致收入有損失就ok

htps://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/Asset s/Documents/PDE/High-Profile/Depp%20v2%20Heard/CL-2019-2911-jury-instructionS.pdf
講緊呢份jury instructions
No. C

(圖版)
第2題答yes幾利JD, 明明篇文無提個任何人名

唔係淨係針對title, JD個邊揀咗3句嚟告

咁岩(a)係篇文title, 所以jury先問係針對依句定成篇文

https://twitter.com/grinsli/status/1531617108299218954?s=21&t=2UNoR6ap-sie5gUT4Dsj0w

以我理解依家jury係按以上各自3項statement去判定對方是否有誹謗成份

Jury問既係JD team 第一項statement

但仲有第2同3都只係講DV and abuse 個人認為第2,3項係比較大空間去爭論

但係咪3項statement中晒先成立誹謗定中其中一項都已構成誹謗