有咩文體係要sub headings? Article?
同埋下款洗唔洗簽名?
Chris wong
Chris wong
?
report
yes formal letters
我想問吓有冇啲咩skills判斷某啲vocabulary 係一定係有S定冇S
我淨係知道information must no s

其他好似Exercise 有冇
有咩文體係要sub headings? Article?
同埋下款洗唔洗簽名?
Chris wong
Chris wong
?
report
yes formal letters
Reading parta 最後條mc揀左咩
C
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
C
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
C
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
Q9 寫青少年追求物質生活 努力工作拎升職加薪 相反 本地無提供機會先愈做愈頹
第二就話 青少年追夢 拎巴士佬做例子
CR 就尻寫 話啲人話青少年成日做野玩電話
所以唔勤力工作 我話玩電話其實係上網揾market 同 target
無gammar
有無可能切題有3/2尾![]()
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
都係答c
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
都係答c
雖然一開始睇落好負面唔似 但係好似無第二個option比C更適合所以我都答左C
C
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
第7條 冇落sub heading 會唔會仆街![]()
第7條 冇落sub heading 會唔會仆街![]()
Report喎
第7條 冇落sub heading 會唔會仆街![]()
Report喎
Introduction
Reason
Suggestions
Conclusion
我係咁寫
有咩文體係要sub headings? Article?
同埋下款洗唔洗簽名?
Chris wong
Chris wong
?
report
yes formal letters
我想問吓有冇啲咩skills判斷某啲vocabulary 係一定係有S定冇S
我淨係知道information must no s![]()
其他好似Exercise 有冇
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
唔記得Sorry![]()
但我覺得唔係回收唔到
因為篇文提到國家(美國)recycle rate 其實係高於最多可以有用回收嘅rate![]()
最多回收35%係有用 但美國回收到43%
好似係咁 可能有錯
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
唔記得Sorry![]()
但我覺得唔係回收唔到
因為篇文提到國家(美國)recycle rate 其實係高於最多可以有用回收嘅rate![]()
最多回收35%係有用 但美國回收到43%
好似係咁 可能有錯
篇文好似係講政府想將回收率推到50-100
但係一直卡住喺35上唔到去
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
唔記得Sorry![]()
但我覺得唔係回收唔到
因為篇文提到國家(美國)recycle rate 其實係高於最多可以有用回收嘅rate![]()
最多回收35%係有用 但美國回收到43%
好似係咁 可能有錯
篇文好似係講政府想將回收率推到50-100
但係一直卡住喺35上唔到去
呢個佢篇文有提到 但只係一兩句
但我覺得成篇文重點係 recycling有佢嘅own cost所以其實唔應該recycle 咁多?
係佢解錯定我哋解錯,咩起老人院呀
屌![]()
![]()
![]()
應該係佢解錯
但係我見好多人都寫咗build elderly home![]()
![]()
邊到搵?
Top!ck
我英文廢,睇左好撚耐都唔知老人院同學校有乜撚野關係,點比個屋企班廢老![]()
準備2018啦
紙巴話c![]()
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
唔記得Sorry![]()
但我覺得唔係回收唔到
因為篇文提到國家(美國)recycle rate 其實係高於最多可以有用回收嘅rate![]()
最多回收35%係有用 但美國回收到43%
好似係咁 可能有錯
篇文好似係講政府想將回收率推到50-100
但係一直卡住喺35上唔到去
呢個佢篇文有提到 但只係一兩句
但我覺得成篇文重點係 recycling有佢嘅own cost所以其實唔應該recycle 咁多?
我覺得作者係想插美國搞全面回收,因為得少部分回收係cost effective,所以跟本唔可行
係佢解錯定我哋解錯,咩起老人院呀
屌![]()
![]()
![]()
應該係佢解錯
但係我見好多人都寫咗build elderly home![]()
![]()
邊到搵?
Top!ck
我英文廢,睇左好撚耐都唔知老人院同學校有乜撚野關係,點比個屋企班廢老![]()
準備2018啦