有咩文體係要sub headings? Article?
同埋下款洗唔洗簽名?
Chris wong
Chris wong
?
report
yes formal letters
我想問吓有冇啲咩skills判斷某啲vocabulary 係一定係有S定冇S
我淨係知道information must no s
其他好似Exercise 有冇
有咩文體係要sub headings? Article?
同埋下款洗唔洗簽名?
Chris wong
Chris wong
?
report
yes formal letters
Reading parta 最後條mc揀左咩
C
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
C
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
C
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
Q9 寫青少年追求物質生活 努力工作拎升職加薪 相反 本地無提供機會先愈做愈頹
第二就話 青少年追夢 拎巴士佬做例子
CR 就尻寫 話啲人話青少年成日做野玩電話
所以唔勤力工作 我話玩電話其實係上網揾market 同 target
無gammar
有無可能切題有3/2尾
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
都係答c
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
都係答c
雖然一開始睇落好負面唔似 但係好似無第二個option比C更適合所以我都答左C
C
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
第7條 冇落sub heading 會唔會仆街
第7條 冇落sub heading 會唔會仆街
Report喎
第7條 冇落sub heading 會唔會仆街
Report喎
Introduction
Reason
Suggestions
Conclusion
我係咁寫
有咩文體係要sub headings? Article?
同埋下款洗唔洗簽名?
Chris wong
Chris wong
?
report
yes formal letters
我想問吓有冇啲咩skills判斷某啲vocabulary 係一定係有S定冇S
我淨係知道information must no s
其他好似Exercise 有冇
C 係點解國家減少回收?
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
唔記得Sorry
但我覺得唔係回收唔到
因為篇文提到國家(美國)recycle rate 其實係高於最多可以有用回收嘅rate
最多回收35%係有用 但美國回收到43%
好似係咁 可能有錯
但rubbish好似負面過the myth of recycling好多
所以揀左其他
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
唔記得Sorry
但我覺得唔係回收唔到
因為篇文提到國家(美國)recycle rate 其實係高於最多可以有用回收嘅rate
最多回收35%係有用 但美國回收到43%
好似係咁 可能有錯
篇文好似係講政府想將回收率推到50-100
但係一直卡住喺35上唔到去
有兩個options講垃圾
一個係回收係垃圾
一個係事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
唔記得Sorry
但我覺得唔係回收唔到
因為篇文提到國家(美國)recycle rate 其實係高於最多可以有用回收嘅rate
最多回收35%係有用 但美國回收到43%
好似係咁 可能有錯
篇文好似係講政府想將回收率推到50-100
但係一直卡住喺35上唔到去
呢個佢篇文有提到 但只係一兩句
但我覺得成篇文重點係 recycling有佢嘅own cost所以其實唔應該recycle 咁多 ?
係佢解錯定我哋解錯,咩起老人院呀
屌
應該係佢解錯
但係我見好多人都寫咗build elderly home
邊到搵?
Top!ck
我英文廢,睇左好撚耐都唔知老人院同學校有乜撚野關係,點比個屋企班廢老 準備2018啦
紙巴話c
C: Recycling is more rubbish than you think
ABD明顯唔係Ans 得C揀其實
A 係in defence of recycling
事實上國家回收唔到垃圾
有呢個option?
唔記得Sorry
但我覺得唔係回收唔到
因為篇文提到國家(美國)recycle rate 其實係高於最多可以有用回收嘅rate
最多回收35%係有用 但美國回收到43%
好似係咁 可能有錯
篇文好似係講政府想將回收率推到50-100
但係一直卡住喺35上唔到去
呢個佢篇文有提到 但只係一兩句
但我覺得成篇文重點係 recycling有佢嘅own cost所以其實唔應該recycle 咁多 ?
我覺得作者係想插美國搞全面回收,因為得少部分回收係cost effective,所以跟本唔可行
係佢解錯定我哋解錯,咩起老人院呀
屌
應該係佢解錯
但係我見好多人都寫咗build elderly home
邊到搵?
Top!ck
我英文廢,睇左好撚耐都唔知老人院同學校有乜撚野關係,點比個屋企班廢老 準備2018啦