[借ac] 係美國新聞學院寫咗篇自己唔係中國人嘅文

O'm from Hong Kong, not CHINA

推

Steve says:
April 23, 2019 at 11:18 am

呢個comment寫得幾好幾得體

反映就係班支那學生投訴你破壞中國人情誼、融洽

咁樣樣 都唔出奇嘅

我話 我同你pm交流啊 lol

第一個女expat講嘅野同香港好多expat諗嘅野係一撚樣 too simple sometimes naive

加油絲打
因住d支那狗咬你

嗰個真係唔洗理 佢只係白人主義喺擁有white privilege底下談論英治香港 佢根本無權去comment啲咩

睇晒 佢係咁講無full context會做錯judgement
但佢引啲證據話HK=CHINA果陣
夠無引埋香港financially同socially唔同於中國啦
年年department of state出report講香港點樣與中國不同
屌佢班大陸人真係垃撚圾到不堪
見到啲Xu Xi就想嘔

推 好文

comment左

留名支持

佢哋啲point其實唔足以去打低我嘅point 所以好on9

美國籍八萬，BC 25萬，法國籍三萬

用學術研究為理由解釋

大家盡量都用英文回啦 始終係英文網址 無人會明

謝巴打

支持師兄!

打咗篇reply回應，但等緊moderator approve
雖然好撚左膠，但都post出嚟俾大家睇下先

First, the so-called reiteration is completely unnecessary. However complicated the historical backgrounds is in Hong Kong, Tibet or in Taiwan, their partially independent status, different from the mainland China, is undeniable. The author of the original article has, therefore, to my understanding, gives a fair summary of the difference between these region and the mainland.

Second, I cannot see any problem regarding calling people living in Hong Kong 'Hongkonger', so does those living in any cities in China or in the States. The official status, as in the Basic Law, of being a Hong Kong resident is also internationally recognised - the city even has its own passport. I am regretful but it is very suspicious of your intention attacking the author to call Hong Kong citizens as 'Hongkongers' - is this the way you trying to suppress the right of Hong Kong citizens to call themselves however we want?

Third, the author has never argued that Hong Kong is not a part of China. Even the title says 'I am from Hong Kong, not China', it just depicts the thought that some Hongkongers, at least the author him/herself, wish to be identified in such way. As you uphold the freedom of speech, I believe you would have agree the author's right to say his thought (even if it is a pro-independen e one). Such excessive, being way too politically correct, argument further leads to suspicion of your intention of writing this reply - are you trying to mute the voices of Hongkongers, by attacking the columnist and his view with absurd points?

It is completely fine if you have alternative view, and I shall support and defend your freedom of speech even if I have different thoughts. But, I do hope you will respect people of different opinions, just the same way most of the Hongkongers do - the berkeley beacon is a diverse place for opinion exchange, not a platform to mute any 'politically incorrect' messages.

你個comment好on point! 尤其是第三點 完全係我心底話

特別你係呢啲academic野
你話要放上新聞 佢地嚇到瀨屎啦

已經睇晒 sry

Read the whole article and all comment, support you sis. Most of the fucking comment use China/Chinese as a race (and even biologically) to force ppl to be "Chinese", it's just a fucking name, definition made by human. I am what I am, I am a HongKonger cuz I live with my Hong Kong culture, not because I am yellow skin, black hair and brown eyes. Those comments in their false logic about Chinese signified they are from neighbor country.

支持你