[借ac] 係美國新聞學院寫咗篇自己唔係中國人嘅文

香港人可以有雙重國籍㗎

Hi Frances

Reply for Steven Hu 個中國人:
My apologies, but I can't find myself agreeing with what you have said here.

The statement that Hong Kong was, is and will always be a part of China is simply wrong. Hong Kong was a British territory without any doubt, and even for now, the locals do not recognise China as their home country. There should not be any land that "belongs" to a nation forever as it only rings true with the people's support. Nation exists for men; a nation should never render its own people into servitude. National identity should not be forced upon anyone and patriotism should come from a genuine love for the country.

As a Hongkonger, I do not identify as a Chinese. I do not think this is a discredit to your country as I only speak the truth here. Perhaps it is not to your liking, but this is simply how it is. It is wrong to tell Hongkongers to leave their homeland simply because they don't agree with you or China; it is our home, and it will always be our birthplace. It is our city, and we should be the one who is at the helm, deciding for the city's future. We are gradually losing control because of intervention from the Chinese Government who has gone against their own promises.

Respect goes both ways, and you have disregarded that by calling those who desire for freedom and rule of law as slaves. I will refrain from returning the name calling as achieves nothing. Still, it is regretful that you have been in the Land of Free, yet you have not learned the true meaning of freedom.

你真係有BNO既話咪知邊個係傻仔囉

講撚左冇香港呢個國籍 醒未？

支持巴打
更多西方文明國家既人了解下香港及香港人既情況就可以,加油呀
但對支那人講道理,效益唔係好大,成班蝗蟲,又有國家支持,同佢地嘈,真係哂時間
對付支那人,只有靠實力、利益
當班支那人見到你勁,同你作對無利益,佢地就會成隻狗咁
支那人就係咁既賤種,全世界都睇佢地唔起

加油，小心俾支那狗咬

太多00後避唔到支那人身份

睇咗文同少少comment
無追晒post
但有兩樣嘢想提出

1. 漢族/Chinese ethnic係唔存在, I'd rather call myself Cantonese

2. 關於Hong Kong後面要加, China, 反問返班撚屌點解無見過Gibraltar / Bermuda / Falkland Islands後面要加UK? Guam / Hawaii / Puerto Rico 又唔使加US??

G持

大家集思廣益寫篇文去駁支那學生果份野啦

推

前殖民地係聯合國國際人權公約重點保護嘅族群之一，佢地有成個section係講self-determination。文件入面都有講會尊重各國主權，但西方政治哲學認爲政府需要盡責，人民先有義務守法，否則呢個政府就係a failed government，呢條公約就係要保障被政府用「觸犯當地法律」黎做藉口而被逼害嘅人。而且國際法於法律上有凌駕地位。中國係聯合國成員國，就要遵守。

另外，可以用polity黎形容香港，用美屬波多黎各黎比喻（雖然正式定義上兩者係唔同）。

00後表示期望有一日Bno 可以世襲到

同屬支那領土，同係咪一個獨立個體係兩回事
大英帝國時代直情話香港係 The Republic of Hong Kong
USSR時代都係一個國家領土內有16個獨立國家

幫推，多謝絲打將香港人精神發揚光大

純粹俾啲comment（臨近sem尾比較忙所以都無時間幫你用英文comment上去個forum），先戴頭盔
篇文大致望過，四平八穩，由事實出發，係對於外國人嚟講係一篇幾簡潔嘅自述嚟，但如果作為一種論述去對抗中國人個種身份霸權，個人就認為仲有進步空間。

其實建議樓主可以讀吓社會科學院同文學院（尤其後殖理論（E.g. Hybridity, Fanon, Subaltern Studies）、史學（新清史、世界史、台灣史、日本對中國史觀、Postcoloniality）、社會學（民族主義、知識社會學）、文化研究（Stuart Hall 個啲）其他嘅科目，由唔同角度去切入個問題，咁樣一方面係有學術基礎去做底，另一方面係更加有條理同有力同埋深入咁去回應佢地嘅諗法。呢種跨學科嘅能力係比你去用更加廣嘅角度去思考同Position自己嘅文章。簡單舉例：例如有人嘗試對比香港人身份同中國人身份，你可以強調中國人身份認同嘅構成，係由上而下式嘅官方民族主義（Official Nationalism），而且係自古已來都係以暴力征服、兼併同埋同化政策（如宋朝歸化政策、明代土官流官制度至依家嘅離散Diaporsa（大家其實想知點解海外中國人咁親共可以睇吓澳洲學者嘅Silent Invasion入面其實有講中國大使館點樣控制海外華人勢力去介入外國政治同學術自由）等），而香港就係一種下而上建立嘅手足情深嘅關係，唔係由武力同埋精英強加，而係經歷開放邊界之下沉澱，係自發地喜愛香港，而且甘願為雨傘運動付出，呢種重大事件往往係催化咗個種身份認同。咁樣你就可以用唔同嘅學術位置去切入同反駁到佢地嘅質疑，希望呢段Comment可以幫到你手。

利申：本地大學學渣

麻煩你話我知邊度寫住 China

SCC hello

我邊會無，寫到明 British National (Overseas)，係外國人地係當你 British，人哋係睇 Passport 唔係睇樣。
不過 BNO 無續，早就移左民用緊第二本。

以前 Nationality 填 Hong Kong，係外國真係無人嘈。而加無呢隻歌仔唱。

咁得閒覆5毛狗，block 7佢咪算囉

好文, 巴打/絲打 篇文寫得好好.........
第一句就已經好深刻...........
留咗 comment 支持了, 加油 !!!