傳話deal左
marvel d23個展覽張banner重有蜘蛛俠
路邊社消息－蜘蛛俠版權又有新進展，disney開出新deal比sony
老人K
506 回覆
391 Like
35 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁
其實廸廸尼都唔想依家tom既spiderman做得太出色，佢都想攞番個版權自己拍。所以一係就食水食深d，一係就趁早停止collaborations ，等sony拍到成pat屎咁再諗計攞番
老鼠真係老謀深算，我支持sony自己拍番，但如果係拍得柒，咁都係俾番老鼠啦咪霸撚住個版權
老鼠真係老謀深算，我支持sony自己拍番，但如果係拍得柒，咁都係俾番老鼠啦咪霸撚住個版權
mcu既gg咪一鳩樣
disney講到自己好似係莊咁
Mr.Stark
Mr.Stark
Tony Stark
Mr.Stark
Tony Stark
Amazing Spider-Man 2
https://deadline.com/2015/03/amazing-spider-man-2-profit-box-office-2014-1201389608/
The biggest problem, according to our data, is that the movie cost too darned much at $255M. That left Sony Pictures with a $70.38 million net, or a 1.12 cash-on-cash return.
Spider-Man: Homecoming
https://deadline.com/2018/03/spider-man-homecoming-box-office-profit-2017-1202350621/
What a difference it makes having Marvel involved: Spider-Man: Homecoming generated $200.1M in profit, 184% more than the $70.3M earned by the 2014 webslinger title The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Homecoming earned slightly more in worldwide revenues than Amazing, $664.2M to $640.2M, but overall theatrical and ancillary costs dropped 19% between the Garfield and Holland versions, moving from $570M to $464.1M and providing more surplus cash to Sony.
若果Sony學樓上某D清咁眼光去做生意的話，後果真係不敢想像，睇唔明冇辦法但亦都唔係因為蠢，只係完全冇呢個觸覺去睇成件事。
明明有成個MCU做backup加埋賺嘅錢多之前近兩倍，我就完全唔會覺得Sony會咁輕易同MCU決裂，之係差左一個win win deal
https://deadline.com/2015/03/amazing-spider-man-2-profit-box-office-2014-1201389608/
The biggest problem, according to our data, is that the movie cost too darned much at $255M. That left Sony Pictures with a $70.38 million net, or a 1.12 cash-on-cash return.
Spider-Man: Homecoming
https://deadline.com/2018/03/spider-man-homecoming-box-office-profit-2017-1202350621/
What a difference it makes having Marvel involved: Spider-Man: Homecoming generated $200.1M in profit, 184% more than the $70.3M earned by the 2014 webslinger title The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Homecoming earned slightly more in worldwide revenues than Amazing, $664.2M to $640.2M, but overall theatrical and ancillary costs dropped 19% between the Garfield and Holland versions, moving from $570M to $464.1M and providing more surplus cash to Sony.
若果Sony學樓上某D清咁眼光去做生意的話，後果真係不敢想像，睇唔明冇辦法但亦都唔係因為蠢，只係完全冇呢個觸覺去睇成件事。
明明有成個MCU做backup加埋賺嘅錢多之前近兩倍，我就完全唔會覺得Sony會咁輕易同MCU決裂，之係差左一個win win deal
依家老鼠識玩 借xmen比sony玩 換venom spidey可以mcu出萬一sony攬炒
老鼠啲offer仲係幾閪
老鼠啲offer仲係幾閪
迪士尼 = 中共 confirmed 
其實disney propose 個新deal 一直都係co-finance
唔似舊deal 只抽分成唔出錢
唔似舊deal 只抽分成唔出錢
與你為敵，唔駛諗，
打爆米老鼠。
打爆米老鼠。
傾唔掂仲會直接影響埋Sony最賺錢部門Playstation，PS4 Marvel Spider-Man係首日賣出330萬套帶黎2億美元收入，最線估計過左1千萬套收入近7億。真係同Marvel決裂會唔會影響到呢邊就真係佢地先知。
Sony自己套跳入蜘蛛宇宙贏9成老鼠戲
想睇tom hardy係mcu會點，好戲之人不可浪費
希望達成共識啦，大家齊搵錢，觀眾又開心
因為sony無能力
講緊disney propose 個新deal 呀
AMAZING版真係垃圾到仆街
而家有spider-verse 玩咗平行宇宙劇情
仲收購咗PS4 Spiderman 開發團隊，呢隻故事做得幾出色
可以試下嘅
仲收購咗PS4 Spiderman 開發團隊，呢隻故事做得幾出色
可以試下嘅
不了 想睇迪士尼仆街
支持廸廸尼既都on9,罷睇廸廸尼既marvel
點解sony自己拍都要比迪迪尼抽利潤
講新deal都有提到如果sony拍獨立蜘蛛俠電影，好似spiderman noir咁，disney都要抽返利潤
我覺得唔影響呢類非mcu電影嘅獨立性就得，兩邊傾掂數最理想。雖則睇完覺得disney大貪咗啲。
我覺得唔影響呢類非mcu電影嘅獨立性就得，兩邊傾掂數最理想。雖則睇完覺得disney大貪咗啲。
點解成個feel真係咁共產黨同香港咁