無鍾意矮妹，但矢吹奈子屌打佢喎
[KPOP] K-POP 2024討論區 (23)
有時乳細不大
1001 回覆
7 Like
7 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
下
無鍾意矮妹，但矢吹奈子屌打佢喎
無鍾意矮妹，但矢吹奈子屌打佢喎
希望閔媽拎錢出嚟賠違約金 贖返佢地5個
世上只有閔媽好
下 我自己係wiz*one都覺得nako個陣吹大咗
我自己係wiz*one都覺得nako個陣吹大咗就係冇錢/唔想出錢先搞咁多小動作冇d骨氣 又唔妥hybe又賴死唔走
冇d骨氣 又唔妥hybe又賴死唔走下佢izone嗰陣無存在感姐，PD48越戰越勇喎吹大極都無衰過許solo啦
許solo第一次評級C變F
佢izone嗰陣無存在感姐，PD48越戰越勇喎吹大極都無衰過許solo啦許solo第一次評級C變F
pd48嗰陣覺得許唱得好過nako 但嗰陣勁多人叫佢許solo爭主唱仲有佢嗰陣唱歌唔係而家嗰種自信爆棚式嗌歌 起碼係唱緊歌
仲有佢嗰陣唱歌唔係而家嗰種自信爆棚式嗌歌 起碼係唱緊歌佢唔爭主唱嘅話應該都幾大機會入出道組
感謝分享資訊
Nako 喺IZ*ONE個陣反而冇乜機會發揮，應該因為成員太多嘅關係
d2有水王水后
唔會啦，我同佢有共識唔會認
我哋已經好低調
我哋已經好低調
只服申張卡
BM
冇俾負評，但好唔掂呢隊女團
hello. This is ADOR
In the music video production service contract between ADOR and the Dolphiners Films, all rights to the music video as well as secondary works are owned by ADOR. Therefore, posting a video containing NewJeans IP on the Dolphiners Films channel without ADOR's approval is a clear violation of the service contract.
For this reason, ADOR requested Dolphiners Films to “provide proof (email, KakaoTalk possible) that there has been an agreement and approval regarding permission to use copyright and artist portrait rights, or if not, it is correct to issue a ‘director’s cut’” according to the contract terms and conditions. We just passed it along. Protecting an artist's copyrighted work is a natural responsibility for a label. If Dolphiners Films has an agreement with ADOR, it can be presented. Without being provided with any basis for the content, ADOR has no choice but to follow the principles to protect the artist's work.
It is also clear that ADOR received a request to "remove the part that reflects the advertiser's brand or take down the video" in response to the posting of NewJeans' 'ETA Music Video Director's Cut' produced by Dolphiners Films. (The image below is an internal video at the time. This is the Slack message that was reported)
ADOR did not ask Dolphiners Films to delete the video posted on Ban Hee-su's channel. The Ban Hee-su channel is an account created by an ADOR member in accordance with our ‘Online Channel New Guidelines’. ADOR only conducted fact-checking procedures for the ‘ETA Music Video Director’s Cut’ video to protect the artist’s copyright, and never mentioned Ban Hee-soo’s channel. Adore also doesn't want Ban Hee-su's channel to disappear. Dolphiners Films is welcome to run the channel. However, you only need to keep what was promised through the contract regarding the artist's work.
Overreacting to Dolphiners Films' alleged breach of contract and removing entire content is neither an act of pure pain on the part of the creators nor an act in the interest of NewJeans and fans. I hope that the anxiety of artists and fandom will no longer be aggravated by holding YouTube channels hostage.
We would like to apologize to the NewJeans members and Bunnies for causing concern due to unnecessary controversy. ADOR will try to resolve this issue as quickly as possible according to the accurate facts.
In the music video production service contract between ADOR and the Dolphiners Films, all rights to the music video as well as secondary works are owned by ADOR. Therefore, posting a video containing NewJeans IP on the Dolphiners Films channel without ADOR's approval is a clear violation of the service contract.
For this reason, ADOR requested Dolphiners Films to “provide proof (email, KakaoTalk possible) that there has been an agreement and approval regarding permission to use copyright and artist portrait rights, or if not, it is correct to issue a ‘director’s cut’” according to the contract terms and conditions. We just passed it along. Protecting an artist's copyrighted work is a natural responsibility for a label. If Dolphiners Films has an agreement with ADOR, it can be presented. Without being provided with any basis for the content, ADOR has no choice but to follow the principles to protect the artist's work.
It is also clear that ADOR received a request to "remove the part that reflects the advertiser's brand or take down the video" in response to the posting of NewJeans' 'ETA Music Video Director's Cut' produced by Dolphiners Films. (The image below is an internal video at the time. This is the Slack message that was reported)
ADOR did not ask Dolphiners Films to delete the video posted on Ban Hee-su's channel. The Ban Hee-su channel is an account created by an ADOR member in accordance with our ‘Online Channel New Guidelines’. ADOR only conducted fact-checking procedures for the ‘ETA Music Video Director’s Cut’ video to protect the artist’s copyright, and never mentioned Ban Hee-soo’s channel. Adore also doesn't want Ban Hee-su's channel to disappear. Dolphiners Films is welcome to run the channel. However, you only need to keep what was promised through the contract regarding the artist's work.
Overreacting to Dolphiners Films' alleged breach of contract and removing entire content is neither an act of pure pain on the part of the creators nor an act in the interest of NewJeans and fans. I hope that the anxiety of artists and fandom will no longer be aggravated by holding YouTube channels hostage.
We would like to apologize to the NewJeans members and Bunnies for causing concern due to unnecessary controversy. ADOR will try to resolve this issue as quickly as possible according to the accurate facts.
又更好睇lu
張卡潾會更好
張卡冬
都是我老婆s
