Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp 最新戰況 （2）
Magical_Owl
1001 回覆
17 Like
5 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
今日好似冇
星期五方加
星期一繼續
星期一繼續
Most of the potential jurors in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial professed to know little about the case. Some were a bit puzzled when they walked into the Fairfax, VA, courthouse to see signs of “Justice for Johnny.” One potential juror admitted that he couldn’t quite place the plaintiff’s ex-wife. “To be honest, I forgot the name of the other party,” he said.
That was apparent by the relative speed with which it took to pick the jury of 11 men and women, as they were seated by mid-afternoon. Opening arguments will begin Tuesday.
During the roughly four hours of questioning, attorneys on each side gave a glimpse of what will come up during the trial, as they pressed potential jurors on whether they held strong opinions or biases over a number of topics including MeToo, domestic abuse and sexual assault, alcohol and drug use, victim shaming, celebrity social media postings, police believability, the use of foul language and angry destruction of property. All of it has been part of the tabloid coverage of the case — and for good measure, jurors were asked if they knew what The Daily Mail is.
兩邊律師都 screen 過晒先會被挑選入最終嘅陪審團
主要係避免對件案有預設立場, 本身對女權議題例如 #metoo,家暴有強烈意見同傾向, 仲會盡量挑選一啲對單案無認識嘅人
That was apparent by the relative speed with which it took to pick the jury of 11 men and women, as they were seated by mid-afternoon. Opening arguments will begin Tuesday.
During the roughly four hours of questioning, attorneys on each side gave a glimpse of what will come up during the trial, as they pressed potential jurors on whether they held strong opinions or biases over a number of topics including MeToo, domestic abuse and sexual assault, alcohol and drug use, victim shaming, celebrity social media postings, police believability, the use of foul language and angry destruction of property. All of it has been part of the tabloid coverage of the case — and for good measure, jurors were asked if they knew what The Daily Mail is.
兩邊律師都 screen 過晒先會被挑選入最終嘅陪審團
主要係避免對件案有預設立場, 本身對女權議題例如 #metoo,家暴有強烈意見同傾向, 仲會盡量挑選一啲對單案無認識嘅人
https://deadline.com/2022/04/johnny-depp-amber-heard-trial-virginia-1235000402/
終於搵到
The jury is not sequestered , but they were advised not to read or research the case, even to turn off their cell phone notifications to prevent them from accidentally seeing a news alert.
冇隔離,淨係叫佢哋唔好啫
終於搵到
The jury is not sequestered , but they were advised not to read or research the case, even to turn off their cell phone notifications to prevent them from accidentally seeing a news alert.
冇隔離,淨係叫佢哋唔好啫
1. mortgage你要簽contract, 有法律效力，pledge係無法律效力
2. mortgage係由銀行畀賣家錢，賣家係closing時係收到全額款項，無installment. 而家aclu同children hospital都仲未收到佢錢。
2. mortgage係由銀行畀賣家錢，賣家係closing時係收到全額款項，無installment. 而家aclu同children hospital都仲未收到佢錢。
其實d陪審團消唔消化到咁多資料？
我當你係資深辯論評判員
聽左幾個月既互相盤問
都聽到頭昏腦漲啦
或者唔記得上禮拜講過d乜
我當你係資深辯論評判員
聽左幾個月既互相盤問
都聽到頭昏腦漲啦
或者唔記得上禮拜講過d乜
佢個邊嘅律師好似係想為之後 countersue Johnny Depp 團隊放出嚟嘅資料令 AH 聲譽受損而鋪路
好彩單case係virginia審 唔係係加州審。係加州審揾陪審團揾到出年都未開到庭。
下個星期雙方 rebuttal, 好似 5/27 會有 verdict
一集差過一集
浪費咗 JD
浪費咗 JD
JD 係 Virginia 入紙告應該有考慮過依啲因素
27號係開始引導陪審團
冇限制陪審團考慮幾耐
冇限制陪審團考慮幾耐
Live Q&A嚟
佢向Virginia 告係因為washington post個ser向Virginia
唔明，有冇好心人解釋下
唔知呢 搞到1點...
應該都唔係係trial
應該都唔係係trial
朱古力=屎？9估
你啱
當佢講咗第一個大話，見到世界反而係幫住佢
名利雙收，就繼續講更多大話
名利雙收，就繼續講更多大話