https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5740797/2-15-19-US-Stone-Related-Case.pdf
Stone早前提出佢單case唔關俄佬hack DNC案(United States of America v. Netyksho)事, 要求換法官, 而Special Counsel Office(SCO)就話佢單case
A)係根據同一批調查令挖到嘅料, 所以關事:
In the course of investigating that activity, the government
obtained and executed dozens of search warrants on various accounts used to facilitate the transfer of stolen documents for release, as well as to discuss the timing and promotion of their release. Several of those search warrants were executed on accounts that contained Stone’s communications with Guccifer 2.0 and with Organization 1.
即係話, 佢地係查查下俄佬hacker, 發現線索, 掉返轉查Stone, 然後發現唔對路, 最後拉Q埋Stone, 即係Stone可能唔單只係useful fool, 有機會係同謀?
呢度仲爆左之前無爆嘅嘢, 之前爆左Stone有透過中間人接觸WikiLeaks拎料, 呢度爆出SCO仲有證據證明Stone同WikiLeaks以及Guccifer 2.0, 即係俄佬特工hacker有聯絡, 但無透露係關於乜
; 以及B) Stone嘗試妨害嘅國會調查, 就係調查Netyksho案, 所以關事:
In other words, the criminal conduct alleged in Netyksho was a central focus of the congressional investigation that the defendant is alleged to have obstructed, and therefore the activities underlying the crimes charged in that case are part of the same activities underlying the crimes charged in this case. The defendant’s false statements did not arise in a vacuum: they were made in the course of an investigation into possible links between Russian individuals (including the Netyksho defendants), individuals associated with the dumping of materials (including Organization 1), and U.S. persons (including the defendant).
我開始懷疑, 目前呢埋妨礙司法公正指控, 最後將會係串埋一齊, 變成證明conspiracy against USA嘅一部分
