有睇哲學書嘅入嚟揮個手 講你睇乜書

係唔係因為冇實體，所以就冇所謂原有/應有嘅性質，所以無需珍惜/可惜？

二禪收功夫就係非批判、直接、如實咁去觀察當下咁知道嘅性質？

禪唔識呀
不過我由西方哲學嗰套講下
實體 (當係substance先啦) substance唔應該只係material, e.g. body and soul form a substance called human, cosmos as a composition of many substances...

Substance嘅change"變化"就一定會有 不過佢嘅form i.e. human as human, tree as tree不會改變 否則佢就唔會再係原本嗰樣嘢

咁改變嘅 例如老左 就係一啲"相", "表象", appearance嘅唔同

性質: Aristotle and Kant稱為categories 例如quality, location...係將一啲substance定性嘅準則

老夫子、秦先生and大番薯

應有: ought to
是/存在: is/be/exist

兩樣嘢好唔同喎
可以俾講"無需真惜"幾句睇下呀

都很多人生哲理嘅

睇下先

我諗冇我無自性就係講並沒有原本嗰樣嘢？

《心經》基本前置知識（下）——略講般若。一個空字，串連「因緣和合」同「三法印」丨《般若波羅蜜多心經講記》
https://lih.kg/muBsrT
#3 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區
而家先醒起，聽日先再睇