有睇哲學書嘅入嚟揮個手 講你睇乜書

巴打
你有好多嘢都講得好好
多謝啟發

睇哂未?

咁你解下點樣哲學??

我睇Hume一段
問點解認為就係第一個option而唔係其他已經駁5刀

點解呢幾本係哲學而唔係耶教學?

請賜教

佢唔知有冇睇呢?

真
想知 想佢回應
亦多讓我地理解一下

我唔明佢數完一埋基督教神學書反而唔數聖經
而耶穌就算你唔當佢係神，佢都係一個超捧的誓學家，保羅都係

Paul有用argument and personal existential experience justify the existence of creation

Infinite and ultimate being好多古代哲學家都有講 Paul時代一定有講Aristotle and Plato講creation 作為一個羅馬讀書人 Paul冇乜可能冇學過

唔知道大家係點增強自己思考能力？尤其是邏輯方面。睇哲學書幫唔幫到大家？

哲學就exactly係訓練思考
除左了解哲學內容
就係訓練點諗嘢 包括分析/定義/用乜方法 甚至睇文/寫abstract/文章/discussion方法等等
呢啲技巧邊學哲學內容 邊學佢嘅技巧

神叫你出po 咁神有冇叫你睇聖經?
分享下聖經講乜呀 等我哋學下嘢

叔本華嘅人生的智慧，睇完真係會容易確立人生目標

真的? 我睇佢有時唔係好同意佢個argument 想請教師兄 你睇邊份 我都想為叔生平反

其實呢本書算係比較入門，講佢覺得人生要點做先會令自己幸福。
例如本書有講到人生嘅苦係來自於病痛，貧困同埋無聊。前兩者係冇得由我地控制，但無聊係源自於我地精神思想嘅貧乏，先會想喺現實中追求刺激，而且呢啲刺激只係一剎那，唔可以完全填補精神上嘅空虛。
所以叔本華覺得人應該喺自身嘅閒暇中獨處黎充實自己嘅精神思想，而唔係追求外在刺激黎填補內心空虛。喺現實生活黎講我好認同佢嘅觀點，現代我地唔應該追求好多物質嘅慾望或者無效社交，反而應該珍惜閒暇時間黎獨處充實自己。同埋我覺得減少追求外在刺激更加可以避免其他問題例如感情傷害，亂咁洗錢等。
雖然好似好陳腔濫調但睇佢嘅推論你就會覺得佢嘅觀點係合理。
我冇睇佢其他作品，但想知你睇過佢嘅咩作品唔認同佢?

政治哲學太多嘢可以睇
正義論已經有排睇

多謝師兄賜教 未知你睇嗰本嘅書名係乜?

我睇呢兩個chapter: "The Vanity of Existence" & "On Suicide" in On the Suffering of the World
以前睇過 Parerga and Paralipomena中都係講vanity

kant: 擊碎我獨斷嘅迷夢

本書叫“人生的智慧”

好鐘意政哲學 Locke Voltaire
之前state of nature Hobbes

吓
網上寫人生的智慧係附錄和補遺嘅精華
即 Parerga and Paralipomena
咁即係我地好可能睇同一chapter
但我覺得唔係好推論到嘅係on the suffering嗰本
邊段我要搵返了

無人講阿甘本？

Dogmatic slumber

但之後Kant咪又係自己寫自己又做自己理論
喺時候quote下文

"When I see, for instance, a Billiard-ball moving in a straight line towards another; even suppose motion in the second ball should by accident be suggested to me, as the result of their contact or impulse; may I not conceive, that a hundred different events might as well follow from that cause? May not both these balls remain at absolute rest? May not the first ball return in a straight line, or leap off from the second in any line or direction? All these suppositions are consistent and conceivable. Why then should we give the preference to one, which is no more consistent or conceivable than the rest? All our reasonings a priori will never be able to show us any foundation for this preference."

from Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
打破因果必然關係睇睇法
但不能只說他只否定因果

Giorgio Agamben?
我冇睇過呀
你分享下?

無，我都唔係好熟當代哲學，我比較熟政治哲學。

熟邊個? 教下我呢