紐約時報：美國計劃放緩電動車轉型步伐放寬「尾氣排放法規」！

hhsk · 2024-02-18T21:59:02+08:00

https://news.futunn.com/hk/post/38063869 拜登大選年妥協，美國計劃放緩電車轉型步伐華爾街見聞 · 15:30 來源：華爾街見聞作者：徐良輝保護環境，還是保護車商利益，拜登必須抉擇。電動車市場需求下滑，拜登政府或許不得不放緩電車轉型推進速度。據媒體援引相關人士消息，拜登政府正在考慮放寬尾氣排放法規。該法規的目的是促使美國人從汽油車和柴油車轉向電動車。而這一潛在的政策變化，就是爲了回應目前主要汽車製造商和工會的擔憂。消息人士稱：政府將給與汽車製造商更多時間，不要求汽車製造商在未來幾年內迅速提高電動車的銷量，直到2030年後才要求大幅增加電動車銷量。這一潛在政策變化誕生的背景，是電動汽車需求下滑，福特汽車等公司削減電動車產量並開始裁員。早在2023年底，美國3900家汽車經銷商致信拜登總統，以電動汽車需求嚴重下滑爲由，要求拜登重新考慮電動車授權的步伐。經銷商稱：“目前電動車需求，跟不上現行法規促使大量純電動汽車湧入我們經銷們店的速度。純電動車已經在我們經銷門店堆積如山了。” 加拿大皇家銀行分析師Tom Narayan在最近的一份報告中指出，電動汽車增長放緩的趨勢遠未結束：業績季迄今爲止並未展現出任何跡象，來表明電動汽車需求放緩出現任何拐點，L4駕駛的不利因素依然存在，但對供應商庫存所剩的擔憂可能是被過分誇大的。面對電動汽車市場萎靡的需求，汽車製造商削減電動車產能效果卻是極佳。上個月，福特公司的電動車售罄，主要原因就是福特削減了純電動車F-150 Lightning的產，來實現“生產、銷售增長和利潤的最佳平衡”。此外，電動汽車需求的下滑也印證了豐田公司董事長兼前CEO豐田章男此前所說：電動汽車永遠不會主導全球市場，混合動力汽車才是未來。 https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/60Rp5J9 美EV需求下滑車商及工會憂拜登政府擬放寬「尾氣排放法」 CTWANT 更新於 1小時前 • 發布於 1小時前 • 張心瑜據媒體援引相關人士消息，拜登政府正在考慮放寬尾氣排放法規。該法規的目的是促使美國人從汽油車和柴油車轉向電動車。而這一潛在的政策變化，主因目前主要汽車製造商和工會的擔憂。消息人士稱政府將不要求給汽車製造商在未來幾年內迅速提高電動車的銷量，一直到2030年後。這一潛在政策變化誕生的背景，是電動汽車需求下滑，福特汽車等公司削減電動車產量並開始裁員。早在2023年底，美國3900家汽車經銷商致信拜登總統，以電動汽車需求嚴重下滑為由，要求拜登重新考慮電動車授權的步伐。經銷商稱，目前電動車需求，跟不上現行法規促使大量純電動汽車湧入經銷商門市的速度，「純電動車已經在店內堆積如山了。」加拿大皇家銀行分析師近期發布報告指出，電動汽車增長放緩的趨勢遠未結束。業績季迄今為止並未展現出任何跡象，來表明電動汽車需求放緩出現任何拐點。面對電動汽車市場萎靡的需求，汽車製造商削減電動車產能效果卻是極佳。福特公司上個月電動車售罄，主要原因就是福特削減了純電動車F-150 Lightning的產量，來實現生產、銷售增長和利潤的最佳平衡。此外，電動汽車需求的下滑也印證了豐田公司董事長兼前CEO豐田章男此前所說，「電動汽車永遠不會主導全球市場，混合動力汽車才是未來。」 https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/17/climate/biden-epa-auto-emissions.html Biden Administration Is Said to Slow Early Stage of Shift to Electric Cars The change to planned rules was an election-year concession to labor unions and auto executives, according to people familiar with the plan. In a concession to automakers and labor unions, the Biden administration intends to relax elements of one of its most ambitious strategies to combat climate change, limits on tailpipe emissions that are designed to get Americans to switch from gas-powered cars to electric vehicles, according to three people familiar with the plan. Instead of essentially requiring automakers to rapidly ramp up sales of electric vehicles over the next few years, the administration would give car manufacturers more time, with a sharp increase in sales not required until after 2030, these people said. They asked to remain anonymous because the regulation has not been finalized. The administration plans to publish the final rule by early spring. The change comes as President Biden faces intense crosswinds as he runs for re-election while trying to confront climate change. He is aiming to cut carbon dioxide emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles, which make up the largest single source of greenhouse gases emitted by the United States. At the same time, Mr. Biden needs cooperation from the auto industry and political support from the unionized auto workers who backed him in 2020 but now worry that an abrupt transition to electric vehicles would cost jobs. Meanwhile, consumer demand has not been what automakers hoped, with potential buyers put off by sticker prices and the relative scarcity of charging stations. Sensing an opening, former President Donald J. Trump, the Republican front-runner, has seized on electric cars, falsely warning the public that they “don’t work” and telling autoworkers that Mr. Biden’s policies are “lunacy” that he would extinguish on “the first day” of his return to the White House. Last spring, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed the toughest-ever limits on tailpipe emissions. The rules would be so strict, the only way car makers could comply would be to sell a tremendous number of zero-emissions vehicles in a relatively short time frame. The E.P.A. designed the proposed regulations so that 67 percent of sales of new cars and light-duty trucks would be all-electric by 2032, up from 7.6 percent in 2023, a radical remaking of the American automobile market. ⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯

hhsk

382 回覆

44 Like 4 Dislike

最愛潤五月 2024-02-19 14:13:49

係，hybrid唔三唔四，一係全油，一係全電

Hybrid所謂慳左油錢，出門價高左果舊錢都未必cover到，唔好計以後維修

大肥貓 2024-02-19 14:25:18

rav4 而家都仲要食炒。

諗緊我試唔試 costco autoprogram 睇下有無得 msrp。

hhsk 2024-02-19 15:18:08

長崎語障 2024-02-19 15:36:07

你覺得無聲係好處我覺得車有聲先有好處, 你無聲對D行人黎講係好危險。行人大部份都無牌, 如果有嫁車係隔離係無聲佢地係有機會留意唔到對佢黎講無責任留意(總知佢地覺得係咁), 而且以佢地嘅認知, 嫁車如果好大聲一定會覺得有危險, 所以會睇定D 先行出黎, 我相信無人會想比人車死。我就試過好多次停燈位行人綠公仔都無人夠膽行出黎, 一定等我停定先會行, 有次有個想亂過馬路都自己縮撚返入去, 所以我支持響喉

長崎語障 2024-02-19 15:38:29

你香港燒煤發電唔撚臭咩? 米ON9啦, 用電其實仲撚唔環保啊, 升壓降壓傳電全部都有loss , 全部唔撚洗計????

模EE 2024-02-19 15:41:28

其實係
但而家d 濕鳩政策係想ban 純油車，咁惟有買hybrid 叫做有少少future proof 咁
如果無左呢d 濕鳩政策就一定係出純油車好過

模EE 2024-02-19 15:42:18

d 電撚真係唔會理ga

總之電車就係未來 (但有好多問題都未見到解決方案)
油車就係落後

長崎語障 2024-02-19 15:44:04

人地要幫阿爺推產業, 你諗下邊個油車會買大陸製? 有人買都要佢地識做先得, 佢地連油電單車都做唔到

ChoiYerim 2024-02-19 16:23:18

你架車個引擎效率有幾多？你隻黃金右腳可以keep到個引擎幾多時間係最有效率嘅轉速range?油撚日J夜J嘅引擎聲同車身震動嘅能量係邊度黎？

香港發電量有幾多%係燒煤產生？升壓降壓耗損有幾多？
你要計電力輸送耗損又有冇計油罐車用幾多能量由青衣運油去全港油站？

冇數據一味鳩嗡