Canon 用戶討論區 (32)
才學兼憂
991 回覆
4 Like
4 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁
其實唔明出邊d人做乜diu r5m2都咁甘，r1係抵屌嘅，旗艦出到咁，其實同同級比差好遠乜？睇需求嘅話，你要平唔洗追焦連拍會走哂去sony，風景、硬照依d輕鬆，但連拍sony a74同r5唔夠canon，同nikon z8比，你影raw電子快門一秒30張raw仲多過同輕過對面，但同sony a1比好似都仲係輸？但A1係sony最勁個部，a93全域快門全部機型應該無得鬥，Canon係衰少RF鏡選擇同鏡重，依家枝35 1.4都好似出岩方向，希望快d出多d又輕又正嘅鏡
r5ii改善左上代最難頂既jelly effect 同連拍黑屏，其實無乜特別弱的地方，算長用之選，係賣平啲就好
R1係咪原本想搞四像素AF
但搞唔掂先繼續用雙像素AF + 十字型對焦？
不過Canon好似已經谷盡奶力
將cinema line的clog2、界面都擺落R5 ii
好似已經冇保留
（R5c 當初好似特登連clog2都唔俾）
但搞唔掂先繼續用雙像素AF + 十字型對焦？
不過Canon好似已經谷盡奶力
將cinema line的clog2、界面都擺落R5 ii
好似已經冇保留
（R5c 當初好似特登連clog2都唔俾）
上面提過4k60p non-raw係subsampled/link skipped，而R5c係oversampled
影相就為咗sell個AI upscale移除咗個pixel shift
當然呢兩樣嘢如果之後有良心應該都可以靠fireware update後加
至於hardware上暫時見到buffer得五張較少(30 fps, CRAW +jpg）
開埋果半秒pre-shoot就仲少
影相就為咗sell個AI upscale移除咗個pixel shift
當然呢兩樣嘢如果之後有良心應該都可以靠fireware update後加
至於hardware上暫時見到buffer得五張較少(30 fps, CRAW +jpg）
開埋果半秒pre-shoot就仲少
應該係時間問題
遲兩年出但冇比z8勁好多
同a7iv比冇意思，價位定位唔同
同a1比我都覺得算係咁
A1貴好多水桶機
遲兩年出但冇比z8勁好多
同a7iv比冇意思，價位定位唔同
同a1比我都覺得算係咁
A1貴好多水桶機
即是30fps 但連射得5p就完？
仲有樣minor嘢
R3個Mon係4M
R1得翻2M
R3個Mon係4M
R1得翻2M
呢樣我直頭覺得唔關幾m事
屌你老尾兩部高階機2024仲敢比呢種反mon
比落r6ii都話正常合理
屌你老尾兩部高階機2024仲敢比呢種反mon比落r6ii都話正常合理
網上留言唔使咁認真睇
有好多人根本從來唔打算買, 或者本身無R5/R3, 甚至唔係用開Canon
如果係無興趣嘅話我通常就直接move on (例如RF嘅APSC), 無咁得閒仲特登去留言鬧; 人生苦短都係focus返自己鍾意嘅嘢好啲, 同埋玩相機都係為開心, 玩到燥做咩, 有啲留言唔知以為佢係Canon股東
btw都好奇呢度究竟有幾多真用家?
有好多人根本從來唔打算買, 或者本身無R5/R3, 甚至唔係用開Canon
如果係無興趣嘅話我通常就直接move on (例如RF嘅APSC), 無咁得閒仲特登去留言鬧; 人生苦短都係focus返自己鍾意嘅嘢好啲, 同埋玩相機都係為開心, 玩到燥做咩, 有啲留言唔知以為佢係Canon股東
btw都好奇呢度究竟有幾多真用家?
如果仲用R7就實會買嘅
不過宜家準備升R5ii就skip lu
不過宜家準備升R5ii就skip lu
buffer得五張
我之前睇介紹好似唔係咁寫, 仲話有啲情況下係好過Z8
Buffer depths matter when evaluating performance, too, because a pleasant shooting experience is about more than speed. The Canon EOS R5 II promises RAW bursts up to 230 frames and RAW+JPEG up to 150 when using the mechanical shutter and 93 RAW (85 RAW+JPEG) frames with the electronic shutter.
The Sony a7R V, with its slower shooting speed, can shoot more than 580 RAW frames before its buffer fills. The Nikon Z8’s buffer is complex. At 20 FPS, it’s the worst of the bunch at under 100 frames. However, if the user dips the drive mode down to 12 or 15 frames per second, the buffer becomes greater than a thousand.
So, it’s complicated and depends on many variables, but the primary takeaway is that the R5 II is the fastest camera and has pretty good buffer depth. For situations when sheer speed is the best solution, the R5 II wins. When maintaining reasonable speeds over a long period matters, the Z8 is probably the best bet. The Z8 and R5 II offer pre-burst capture modes, which is helpful for nailing the shot.
One more thing to add: Canon’s C-RAW, a compressed RAW file type, changes things. C-RAW doesn’t significantly impact image quality and more than doubles the buffer depth when shooting RAW or RAW+JPEG. When speed matters more than fidelity, C-RAW makes a lot of sense if a person’s photo editing application of choice supports it. At 30 FPS when using C-RAW, photographers can get 170 RAW frames or 160 RAW+JPEG shots before the camera slows down.
https://petapixel.com/2024/07/17/how-the-canon-eos-r5-ii-compares-to-its-peers-spec-for-spec/
我之前睇介紹好似唔係咁寫, 仲話有啲情況下係好過Z8Buffer depths matter when evaluating performance, too, because a pleasant shooting experience is about more than speed. The Canon EOS R5 II promises RAW bursts up to 230 frames and RAW+JPEG up to 150 when using the mechanical shutter and 93 RAW (85 RAW+JPEG) frames with the electronic shutter.
The Sony a7R V, with its slower shooting speed, can shoot more than 580 RAW frames before its buffer fills. The Nikon Z8’s buffer is complex. At 20 FPS, it’s the worst of the bunch at under 100 frames. However, if the user dips the drive mode down to 12 or 15 frames per second, the buffer becomes greater than a thousand.
So, it’s complicated and depends on many variables, but the primary takeaway is that the R5 II is the fastest camera and has pretty good buffer depth. For situations when sheer speed is the best solution, the R5 II wins. When maintaining reasonable speeds over a long period matters, the Z8 is probably the best bet. The Z8 and R5 II offer pre-burst capture modes, which is helpful for nailing the shot.
One more thing to add: Canon’s C-RAW, a compressed RAW file type, changes things. C-RAW doesn’t significantly impact image quality and more than doubles the buffer depth when shooting RAW or RAW+JPEG. When speed matters more than fidelity, C-RAW makes a lot of sense if a person’s photo editing application of choice supports it. At 30 FPS when using C-RAW, photographers can get 170 RAW frames or 160 RAW+JPEG shots before the camera slows down.
https://petapixel.com/2024/07/17/how-the-canon-eos-r5-ii-compares-to-its-peers-spec-for-spec/
間嘢係沒落緊
但係吹到相機界nokia就得啖笑啦
但係吹到相機界nokia就得啖笑啦
typo
想打五秒
想打五秒
希望佢快開放埋副廠整ff 鏡頭
想請問如果想一機一鏡嘅話，新嗰支24-105 2.8係咪最佳選擇走天涯？主要係想輕便唔使成日換鏡。
而家自己手頭上係用緊R6 gen1, 2470 F2.8, 2535F4, 同埋餅鏡85 2.
去旅行嘅話的確有啲笨重，但最卻步嘅係新嗰支成1.4公斤，其實真係好重唔知點樣選擇
利申另外自己仲會有一部fuji x100vi，如果係呢個情況你哋會點選擇？
而家自己手頭上係用緊R6 gen1, 2470 F2.8, 2535F4, 同埋餅鏡85 2.
去旅行嘅話的確有啲笨重，但最卻步嘅係新嗰支成1.4公斤，其實真係好重
唔知點樣選擇利申另外自己仲會有一部fuji x100vi，如果係呢個情況你哋會點選擇？
呢間老土公司應該有生之年都唔見有
full size hdmi都要乞求咗幾年先畀人
full size hdmi都要乞求咗幾年先畀人
買枝24-105加多枝EF定焦
無幾個，好想等r5ii快d上showroom試下個對焦系統，感覺r6->r6ii個對焦系統追人咬得實左，好想知r5ii個追焦會係乜樣，通常等等下就等左r6iii
天涯點會諗2.8
呢個R1 review幾詳盡
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-r1-initial-review
R1 vs R3 vs A9 III vs 1D X III 比較
呢個comment幾抵死
It clearly is the workhorse for journalists and professional sports photographers, like the equivalent offerings from Nikon and Sony.
A lot of the commenters will notably ignore that and judge it against their hobbyist point of view, or pretending they have better insight into the demands of the target group than the manufacturers do.
This camera (and its predecessors) can survive working in a war zone. That’s what they are made for. That’s how you have to evaluate a machine like this.
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-r1-initial-review
R1 vs R3 vs A9 III vs 1D X III 比較
呢個comment幾抵死
It clearly is the workhorse for journalists and professional sports photographers, like the equivalent offerings from Nikon and Sony.
A lot of the commenters will notably ignore that and judge it against their hobbyist point of view, or pretending they have better insight into the demands of the target group than the manufacturers do.
This camera (and its predecessors) can survive working in a war zone. That’s what they are made for. That’s how you have to evaluate a machine like this.
睇黎r3都唔洗有2代
你個問題有啲矛盾, 而且未提到影咩多 (人/景/其他?), 幾難俾合適建議...
如果考慮焦距再加光圈, 24-105mm f2.8確實適合一機一鏡唔使成日換鏡, 不過點都稱唔上輕便
但如果俾我揀一機一鏡, 因為我影人像多, 所以首選都係會揀返28-70mm f2, 焦距差少少但始終大一級光圈, 喺室內同夜晚就有明顯優勢
(有時用24-105mm f2.8, 都會想忍唔住帶多枝大光圈定焦)
至於X100VI呢啲便攜機同上面又無咩衝突嘅, 操控/對焦/性能/畫質都係兩回事, 所以可以同時擁有
我都有部Q3, 係幾靚仔同方便, 但近排都係擺防潮櫃多; 去旅行嘅話我都係帶返Canon, 對焦可靠啲
如果考慮焦距再加光圈, 24-105mm f2.8確實適合一機一鏡唔使成日換鏡, 不過點都稱唔上輕便
但如果俾我揀一機一鏡, 因為我影人像多, 所以首選都係會揀返28-70mm f2, 焦距差少少但始終大一級光圈, 喺室內同夜晚就有明顯優勢
(有時用24-105mm f2.8, 都會想忍唔住帶多枝大光圈定焦)
至於X100VI呢啲便攜機同上面又無咩衝突嘅, 操控/對焦/性能/畫質都係兩回事, 所以可以同時擁有
我都有部Q3, 係幾靚仔同方便, 但近排都係擺防潮櫃多; 去旅行嘅話我都係帶返Canon, 對焦可靠啲
我估無, 當時應該係過渡性
有啲似R/RP而家都無二代, 入門ff機變咗R8
有啲似R/RP而家都無二代, 入門ff機變咗R8
個品牌確係感覺有啲傳統(老土?), 但諗諗下其實RF鏡好多都別樹一幟/有啲gimmick
• rf600mm 800mm f11 平價玩超長焦
• rf100mm f2.8 玩散景
• rf70-200mm f2.8 當年係最輕同最短 (Sony GM II好正)
• rf28-70mm f2 出咗差唔多6年都仲係得佢有呢個spec (Sony似就快出24-70mm f2)
• rf24-105mm f2.8 又係只此一家
• rf10-20mm f4 係最wide嘅zoom鏡
• rf200-800mm f9 係最遠嘅zoom鏡
• 仲有VR鏡頭...
或者玩鏡頭好過玩相機
• rf600mm 800mm f11 平價玩超長焦
• rf100mm f2.8 玩散景
• rf70-200mm f2.8 當年係最輕同最短 (Sony GM II好正
)• rf28-70mm f2 出咗差唔多6年都仲係得佢有呢個spec (Sony似就快出24-70mm f2
)• rf24-105mm f2.8 又係只此一家
• rf10-20mm f4 係最wide嘅zoom鏡
• rf200-800mm f9 係最遠嘅zoom鏡
• 仲有VR鏡頭...
或者玩鏡頭好過玩相機
我都覺得支24105 2.8絕對唔輕便，loading黎講唔係幫我減輕得幾多，慳返嘅就係換鏡時間，但自己比較鍾意Tele嘅壓縮感，所以70又未必夠滿足到自己，其實支24105 F4重量好OK，但係四光圈又略嫌有啲雞肋。所以最後應該都係得個諗字。1.4kg對我黎講太大負擔
旅行我反而會大機細機都想帶，鍾意富士嘅菲林模擬色，後期lightRoom自己真係執唔到佢嗰個feel
旅行我反而會大機細機都想帶，鍾意富士嘅菲林模擬色，後期lightRoom自己真係執唔到佢嗰個feel