諾貝爾物理學獎3得主證實「量子糾纏」 推翻愛因斯坦理論

589 回覆
479 Like 16 Dislike
2022-10-13 14:07:50
SUPERPOSITION

This phenomenon is the hardest to understand and visualize since nothing in our mundane, day to day lives behave this way. When in superposition (a special state a particle can be in) a property of a quantum particle can be in multiple states at the same time. (Ex – spin of an electron can be up and down at the same time).



An object can be in superposition only when nothing is interacting with it. The difficulty is that if we want to measure a property of that object, we have to interact with the object in some manner. Therefore, as soon as the superposition is observed, it will collapse and revert to one of the more classical values (0 or 1) randomly. Now, if this experiment is performed multiple times, a probability distribution for each classical state can be observed.
2022-10-13 15:03:27
btw哲學好多掂量子力學既學者都係無數底
我睇過啲書/論文集有涉及量子力學 (例如講自由意志個啲),有啲會有好多公式,有啲係一條公式同數字都無
2022-10-13 15:04:33
Gundam 00行得好前
2022-10-13 19:05:35
咁有料既人要認同既
做人要理性同面對現實
所以中國最大既問題唔係有無人才
而係刻意去偷完人野又唔認
然後低價製造完(因為慳左研發成本)
再黑心地整死返辛苦研發既人
2022-10-14 07:33:48
"了解個原理,唔需要數底" 荒謬
識得個名詞唔代表你識樣野 你唔會話自己背到本字典就叫識英文
我夠可以唔用數學講Quantum mechanics, 但未只會停留係我講你聽既level
你點verify 我講既野係岩? 每個專有名詞都有formalism去support, 你自己skip晒中間啲steps然後同我講你了解個原理?
你有無能力將我講既野做更進一步既思考?
就算可以, 你有咩野justification認為自己make緊educated guess, 而唔係好似呢個po大部分科學科幻都分唔清既人?

呢個po 一堆人拋啲terms出黎 咩wavefunction collapse, 咩double slit experiment 反正唔駛任何基礎去back up 一定了解原理啦話
QM入面到底何謂measurement 佢地知唔知? 上面仲有人講一定要有人先叫做觀測

我stand by我第一個reply 既說話, 如果你對"了解量子力學" 既認知只係 對住三姑六婆打飛機認叻既程度既話, 咁你就真係唔需要有數底

一早估到有人會用Einstein句quote架喇
我要用layman terms有幾難
但用得layman terms就自然伴隨一定程度既assumptions/caveat同lost in translation

btw 我日日係lab (相入面唔係我, 岩岩即刻影) generate entangled atomic ensemles

講資格吓話? 你咪challenge吓我比唔比你了解QM囉
2022-10-14 07:38:07
我有時見啲科普文章用laymen terms寫我地既results
佢地寫既野同我地實際做緊既野跟本唔同
只不過單純係一般眼中無咩分別 因為一般人唔了解背後既原理
2022-10-14 08:13:39
簡單一個例子, 粒子既自旋 Spin
laymen解釋一般會用 粒子真係轉緊既圖黎表達, 即係類似咁


但sorry 粒particle唔係真係自轉緊 呢個只係classical interpretation of a quantum property
甚至最初Ralph Kronig提出黎個interpretation嗰陣Werner Heisenberg (測不準定理條友) 同Wolfgang Pauli (Exclusion principle條友) 係反對呢個idea: "it is indeed very clever but of course has nothing to do with reality".

你問我用一個溫柔啲講句係岩唔曬既解法去解一個量子力學concept算唔算令你了解佢係咩?
2022-10-14 08:36:32
其實做乜鬼嘢
大眾想了解咩事 laymen解釋有咩問題
2022-10-14 08:42:37
拎獎既技術已經好舊 中國本身都超越晒
2022-10-14 08:46:34
有咩用?都係買唔起樓
2022-10-14 08:55:09
科學係9up,然後揾人證實㗎啦
2022-10-14 08:59:14
諗到點應用真係勁
2022-10-14 09:14:14
我完全明白了
2022-10-14 09:17:44
2022-10-14 09:20:15
隨意門,同埋時光機,就快出現
2022-10-14 09:22:22
“你地無資格講了解個原理一定要數底”

其實外行人評內行人就真係好驟忌,你一句車埋黎就話人無資格講真係唔係好友善。

好啦,到你見到人地有相當反應都唔收,仲加句咩”一睇就知你現實無咩朋友既油頭毒撚”,有冇諗過你先係撩交嗌果個
2022-10-14 09:40:37
無問題
我第一個reply俾咗兩個對了解既睇法, 你跟邊個關我撚事
我覆另一條友quote Einstein話我唔夠了解QM 同你有咩關係先
自己唔get又無point就人身攻擊 真係一啲都唔毒
2022-10-14 09:41:38
是快呀
2022-10-14 09:46:03
我邊度有唔畀你討論個subject本身

我quote 果兩句都係你地啲謾罵黎
2022-10-14 09:50:40
只係"了解發生咩事" 同 "了解件事發生既背後原因" 既差異
laymen解釋前者係一啲問題都無
解釋後者都無大問題, 正如我想講, 會有limitations, 睇你既受眾分唔分得到 絕大部分情況下都做到解釋既效果
純粹有條友覺得要分清前者後者係藉口, 唔能夠用唔用數學解QM就係無資格, 唔夠了解QM啫
2022-10-14 10:02:37
我認同你講
如果你對"了解量子力學" 既認知只係 對住三姑六婆打飛機認叻既程度既話, 咁你就真係唔需要有數底

QM有太多on9仔識d term 扮哂野
但連粒子有咩特性都唔知,係度扮專家




講左咁多頁,我都唔見有人講點prove「量力糾纏」係真
2022-10-14 12:44:34
講資格真係
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞