Christine Blasey Ford vs Brett Kavanaugh 聽證會有無人睇？

啱啱嗰個星期嘅新聞
分開覆搞到好散
你去CNN,fox嗰啲慢慢揾

sor 我fake news 咗

應該有查到，不過好快就話無case

#198#
但想問如果查會點查？除左問證人
好似真係無證據都咁多年前

陣間問kavanaugh民主黨實jer住fbi問睇吓佢點拆

Joe Biden 當年都冇打算用FBI report 去質Thomas

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2018/09/26/how-joe-bidens-comments-about-fbi-anita-hill-are-now-being-used-against-democrats/

當年拜登都承認fbi investigate無用

'It was NOT mistaken identity. I know Brett Kavanaugh': Christine Ford tells senators she is SURE nominee and his friend attacked her as she comes close to tears and says: 'I was underneath one of them while the two laughed'

現在變咗咁，即係點

所以我自己真係唔信民主黨無政治動機

唔知，不過按當年經驗其實好難查證，所以republican唔想 fbi查先r頭

我聽過佢地好似話呢個唔係federal crime所以唔關fbi事同埋已經做過6次background checks

我覺得fbi呢方面好亂唔知應該係點

無話邊個唔啱嘅，兩年前共和黨都出盡所有招數阻garland 啦

係囉，
但話你好似性侵過我就真係怪招

政治真係玩死人

一開始爆gang rape我真係O左嘴
想睇果個出黎聽證多d

Vanity Fair: Trump telling people he’s furious that WH aides didn’t have advance knowledge of how credible Ford would seem, per 2nd source

source

fox news: http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/27/chris-wallace-christine-blasey-ford-testimony-rachel-mitchell-disaster-republicans

我無追開呢單新聞
但我想請教下點解證據不足到咁
呢單case都可以上到庭？
35年前係咪會過咗追溯期？
係因為涉及政治所以有好多助力擺佢上枱？
咁同witch hunt有乜分別？

無上到court，係senate的hearing。

多謝解答
等我爬下文先

美國有Statute of Limitations
https://www.revelist.com/feminism/statute-of-limitations-rape/4429

過左就唔比告
只有性侵未成年人可以照告

問題係隔太耐都好難告得入
-----
現在係聽證會唔係法庭開壇

其實你講得無錯,純粹係人格謀殺

Brett Kavanaugh真係好嬲