Ford其實都慘咁樣俾人用黎做政治工具
想保密俾25民主黨爆晒出黎
最好笑係仲要Feinstein屈返Ford d friend爆出黎
內控
Christine Blasey Ford vs Brett Kavanaugh 聽證會有無人睇？
Doug_Demuro
1001 回覆
32 Like
2 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
無眼睇
Ford其實都慘咁樣俾人用黎做政治工具
想保密俾25民主黨爆晒出黎
最好笑係仲要Feinstein屈返Ford d friend爆出黎 內控
Ford其實都慘咁樣俾人用黎做政治工具
想保密俾25民主黨爆晒出黎
最好笑係仲要Feinstein屈返Ford d friend爆出黎
內控
提外話
回帶劉仲敬講大法官重要性
講真呢d stunt咁搞法係人都做到啦，咁仲得了？無憑無證。就算Trump下次提名個女人佢地都可以搵幾個男人出黎話佢地俾個女人性侵啦，根本無撚敵，同依家一樣你有你講我有我講姐
Senate Insider: Kavanaugh Votes Secured
After an emotional day of testimony on Capitol Hill, a late Thursday report from Townhall citing a Senate insider reveals that Brett Kavanaugh has the votes to make it out of committee and will be confirmed on the floor for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sens. Flake (R-AZ), Collins (R-ME), Murkowski (R-AK), and Manchin (D-WV) are expected to vote in favor of Kavanaugh. All the Republicans are voting yes. Also, in the rumor mill, several Democrats may break ranks and back Kavanaugh. That’s the ball game, folks. -Townhall
Thursday's proceedings saw a rollercoaster of emotions from both Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford - who claims he groped her at a high school party in 1982.
Ford's testimony was considered compelling, with Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) calling her an "attractive, good witness," however betting site PredictIt showed Kavanaugh's odds of confirmation steadily climbing after ranking minority leader Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) laid out Ford's case. He stands at 74% as of this writing.
Kavanaugh, on the other hand, shook the building with righteous indignation - slamming Democrats for smearing his family name and his lifetime of achievements. His opening statement was gripping and emotional - with Kavanaugh breaking down into tears several times, and seething with rage during other pivotal moments - such as when he excoriated Feinstein for withholding Ford's letter from the committee for several weeks before it was leaked to the press.
Feinstein was taken aback, and immediately pivoted to a softer tact which was ultimately not convincing. The Democrats attempted several times to corner Kavanaugh on why he hasn't advocated for an FBI investigation into the allegations against him, to which Kavanaugh stated several times that this would ultimately be unproductive since the agency doesn't render an opinion, which was the Judiciary Committee's job. ....
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-27/senate-insider-kavanaugh-votes-secured
After an emotional day of testimony on Capitol Hill, a late Thursday report from Townhall citing a Senate insider reveals that Brett Kavanaugh has the votes to make it out of committee and will be confirmed on the floor for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sens. Flake (R-AZ), Collins (R-ME), Murkowski (R-AK), and Manchin (D-WV) are expected to vote in favor of Kavanaugh. All the Republicans are voting yes. Also, in the rumor mill, several Democrats may break ranks and back Kavanaugh. That’s the ball game, folks. -Townhall
Thursday's proceedings saw a rollercoaster of emotions from both Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford - who claims he groped her at a high school party in 1982.
Ford's testimony was considered compelling, with Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) calling her an "attractive, good witness," however betting site PredictIt showed Kavanaugh's odds of confirmation steadily climbing after ranking minority leader Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) laid out Ford's case. He stands at 74% as of this writing.
Kavanaugh, on the other hand, shook the building with righteous indignation - slamming Democrats for smearing his family name and his lifetime of achievements. His opening statement was gripping and emotional - with Kavanaugh breaking down into tears several times, and seething with rage during other pivotal moments - such as when he excoriated Feinstein for withholding Ford's letter from the committee for several weeks before it was leaked to the press.
Feinstein was taken aback, and immediately pivoted to a softer tact which was ultimately not convincing. The Democrats attempted several times to corner Kavanaugh on why he hasn't advocated for an FBI investigation into the allegations against him, to which Kavanaugh stated several times that this would ultimately be unproductive since the agency doesn't render an opinion, which was the Judiciary Committee's job. ....
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-27/senate-insider-kavanaugh-votes-secured
其實Republican今次處理得唔錯
即刻聯絡ford安排testify
揾Ford聲稱嘅 witness
揾岀面女性檢察官question both sides保持中立，唔會比人話bias
不過最重要係kavanaugh自己爭氣
個opening statement講得太好
即刻聯絡ford安排testify
揾Ford聲稱嘅 witness
揾岀面女性檢察官question both sides保持中立，唔會比人話bias
不過最重要係kavanaugh自己爭氣
個opening statement講得太好
冇講大話講真心話大家一定睇得出
問題係大部分人都冇睇呢，我唔係番hea工都冇可能睇哂佢
咁呢D人你點同佢講道理都冇用架啦 佢係想你死就想你死
Kavanaugh 應該排右幾 ?
原來係美國準大法官卡瓦諾 Brett Kavanaugh 性侵事件，要留名跟進 
主流傳媒都似係左派居多
睇番左媒報2016總統選舉真係笑撚死，死口話trump輸，d票點下多啲點下多啲開始依依哦哦，到贏尻埋成班好似唔想報咁
兩個月前既anonymous letter你係指30/7/2018 ford send比feinstein嗰封? 嗰封唔係anonymous架喎. (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/2018-09-20-feintein-to-grassley_-july-30-letter-from-ford)
而且last minute既指控不嬲都唔係講緊ford, 而係講緊feinstein, 既然佢係咁想幫被害者既話咁就應該一睇完封信就做野, 而唔係兩個月後先因為封信由佢手上唔知點解比人leak左之後先做野. 反正如果係事實而又證據確鑿既話, kavanaugh係唔係都會pass唔到nomination, dem係唔係都會贏. 而家佢兩個月之後laste minute先做野, 比人感覺上係好似佢想拖到mid term咁解姐.
當年clarence 被屈大把時間, 唔同今次咁近mid term. 當年clarence 要查既係10件前左右既事, 而唔係好似今次咁係查36年前既事. 就算FBI去查我地大家都知根本就唔會查到d咩野, 我地連件事喺邊度發生都唔知, 咩野時間發生都唔知, ford話有去過既人(包括佢本人既朋友)都話唔知又咁既事發生過, 咁查乜? 咪又係一樣好似個hearing咁問下問題然後交番份302form出來, 有咩用? DOJ都有出statement 話個allegation “does not involve any potential federal crime.” , 違反咩程序慣例?
至於merrick garland, 根本就係個程序上可以咁做先會發生. 16/3/2017比obama nominate然後 3/1/2017 expire, 前前後後300日都冇比你講成400日? 咁係唔係又等同你於冇證冇據既情況底下指控人地性侵, 人格謀殺其他人? dem將partisan interest凌駕一切的時候係到話GOP唔理程序，老老實實，聽到的時候真係忍唔住笑。
而且last minute既指控不嬲都唔係講緊ford, 而係講緊feinstein, 既然佢係咁想幫被害者既話咁就應該一睇完封信就做野, 而唔係兩個月後先因為封信由佢手上唔知點解比人leak左之後先做野. 反正如果係事實而又證據確鑿既話, kavanaugh係唔係都會pass唔到nomination, dem係唔係都會贏. 而家佢兩個月之後laste minute先做野, 比人感覺上係好似佢想拖到mid term咁解姐.
當年clarence 被屈大把時間, 唔同今次咁近mid term. 當年clarence 要查既係10件前左右既事, 而唔係好似今次咁係查36年前既事. 就算FBI去查我地大家都知根本就唔會查到d咩野, 我地連件事喺邊度發生都唔知, 咩野時間發生都唔知, ford話有去過既人(包括佢本人既朋友)都話唔知又咁既事發生過, 咁查乜? 咪又係一樣好似個hearing咁問下問題然後交番份302form出來, 有咩用? DOJ都有出statement 話個allegation “does not involve any potential federal crime.” , 違反咩程序慣例?
至於merrick garland, 根本就係個程序上可以咁做先會發生. 16/3/2017比obama nominate然後 3/1/2017 expire, 前前後後300日都冇比你講成400日? 咁係唔係又等同你於冇證冇據既情況底下指控人地性侵, 人格謀殺其他人? dem將partisan interest凌駕一切的時候係到話GOP唔理程序，老老實實，聽到的時候真係忍唔住笑。
個樣擺明身有屎架喎。。。。。
民煮黨正式收皮 連品格都輸埋
你收無用，你唔係美國選民
有信心民煮黨會兵敗如山倒
有線新聞話佢表現好差
引起好大反響
On 9 趙應春
引起好大反響
On 9 趙應春
全部男人走晒出黎投對家
今晚香港時間9:30pm舉行投票記住收睇