


真May imply根本係paradoxical重睇樓上解釋啦 垃圾must imply 包埋 may imply
may imply 唔代表 must imply
Logic.
imply 就imply 冇話may 定must![]()
我話differentiability imply continuity 你話係may 定must
意味著必須出現(唔一定有因果關係)
我冇話有因果關係,咁如果may imply 係咩意思?
p implies q 即係如果p true, q 就true.
咁加個may 字個意思係乜? p true, q may true?
Imply就imply
冇may imply依回事
連登仔唔識logic 架
莫講話math個種
連論辯上都一堆logical fallacies