呢件事再次證明
1.人氣高
2.有人盲撐
3.死口唔認錯
1+2+3=真理
［有圖］經濟補習同行內鬥！懸崖咳咳 vs 哈哈哈！
你冇得同我架FC鬥
1001 回覆
1273 Like
50 Dislike
甜品整好未
唔攞出黎姐下話
肯肯定過幾日大家又無左件事
肯肯定過幾日大家又無左件事
似係六月唔畀佢地兩個出post
你錯唔哂
準時啲講，imply係問existing facts, which can include因
但就肯定唔係問果
準時啲講，imply係問existing facts, which can include因
但就肯定唔係問果
我都覺係1... 因為1 係一定..
Price competition 係唔一定 可以係non price competition
Non price competition 都係唔一定....可以係price competition ..
Price competition 係唔一定 可以係non price competition
Non price competition 都係唔一定....可以係price competition ..
Ching sick ball
用返條題目：
Shortage necessarily implies scarcity.
但scarcity Not necessarily implies shortage wor
Shortage necessarily implies scarcity.
但scarcity Not necessarily implies shortage wor
重讀econ la
垃圾
垃圾
唔好再糾緊係呢個on99位啦
你係味同盧老師一樣on99 ga
你係味同盧老師一樣on99 ga
但宜家係個價set低咗，price competition 解決唔到，就會出現non price competition？
Ok thanks.
唔覺得CLIFF會理六月,條友言出必行,你見佢之前幾篇野屌鳩考評局登哂報紙,話希望取消通識科TIM
同埋CLIFF唔似要靠六月搵食,本身都應該有錢,有人見過佢揸白色林寶
佢本身好似講過教補習係想撥亂反正,專心將正確GE野教俾學生
同埋CLIFF唔似要靠六月搵食,本身都應該有錢,有人見過佢揸白色林寶
佢本身好似講過教補習係想撥亂反正,專心將正確GE野教俾學生
「X imples Y」，可以理解為「如果X出現，Y必然會出現。」(當中唔一定有因果關係)https://sites.google.com/site/outlierseconomics/jing-ji-xue-wen-zhang/scarcity-and-economics-goods/2013-07-02-scarcity-part-1-al-p1-02-17
烏大龜返看更先得閑鳩up
ching體諒下在職老人
ching體諒下在職老人
6月同cliff fd底啦
Cliff自己出黎教又得 番大學教又得
Cliff自己出黎教又得 番大學教又得
要理性討論
估唔到KOOPA
以佢智商點會做埋d咁既野
以佢智商點會做埋d咁既野
咁佢叫重讀啦
佢比垃圾更無價值
利申 溫書溫到癲撚左 想9up屌人發洩
佢比垃圾更無價值
利申 溫書溫到癲撚左 想9up屌人發洩
媽呀好柒