［有圖］經濟補習同行內鬥！懸崖咳咳 vs 哈哈哈！

呢粒花生真係好食
完咗重有大大粒

車 , 咁我出到一億屌條女都得架 ....
咁如果果個係有佬 , 堅持用金錢屈機都得架

題目太簡單唔洗討論
總之cliff就一定屌打其他教econ既

最無辜明明係科大
你睇清楚佢email點寫，咁都擺人上枱

出發考試

加油

仲好幽默
不過唔識欣賞佢幽默既人會覺得佢好悶

支持咳咳咳

Thx

因為shortage會有nonprice competition
但nonprice competition 唔一定會有shortage

普通邏輯而已

社會科學有時就會出現呢d問題

夠gift派咪無shortage
咁排隊的確係增加成本

錯晒
B唔啱係因為張五常世界入面冇shortage呢樣野
呢個係AL econ常識黎

Qd 同 demand都未識分，已經唔駛睇

補充標準AL答案
DSE學生可以不理
There is no shortage even in a society, for the simple reason that all markets must be “cleared” in order to produce equilibrium situations. If equilibrium is not attained, no theory is implied, hence economics cannot explain behaviour. If the price of a good is controlled to below the market price, the alleged presence of the shortage, hence disequilibrium, simply means that we have no theory. It is not a fact. If queuing occurs, equilibrium may again be derived as a matter of routine, but then the market is again cleared—hence no shortage.

我用dse邏輯 你用al 邏輯 大家結果一樣

跟住cliff yeung對住篇model answer
就會話「呢度講到個定義就一分.……跟住解釋埋…用教授個解釋就兩分…咳咳咳」

AL econ純粹玩文字邏輯
老老實實好玩過大學econ鳩計完一輪都唔知發生緊咩事