美國X有人逐點講解點解今日加州大火係終極人禍

人地都未嘈完，你地走出黎手嘈乜？
靜靜地睇野啦。

不斷玩環境評估,等D環保團體嘅左膠可以瘋狂CAP政府錢.

唔好再信右膠右癌d fake news喇，左翼成日都飽受d無理據嘅批評

fake news? 個所謂消防張相成個肥婆咁，
難道係deep fake偽造出黎？

我都冇興趣再回佢
提督 你呢兩日 重做左咩research post黎睇下

無啦，有research既上面貼晒
確實係天災，無雨+超大風，但州長亦有責任
州政同市政無做好本份去減輕傷害亦係事實
（又咁啱遇正聯邦護林局無錢開工）
北水南調問題，唔係外界講到話係州長既錯
係因為涉及原居民，幾十年都唔敢郁，
共和黨州長都唔敢郁，而加州人口上升，
水唔夠用，設備又舊（water tank設計有冇漏洞未知
我仲等緊上面兩位專家發表意見brain storm下）
所有wrong piece全部同時發生。

暫時唔太多關於DEI消防員係咪qualify既消息，
呢方面要等多啲消息再評論。

幾時用下你個腦答我，同工程師一9樣，柒左避開唔答，話左你呢類精神病患只會不停創造問題

幾時阻你去笑佢？

佢地開賭我幾時講有問題？

人地side bet我幾時有講過有問題？

有泵定無泵？

Cut cost 有冇影響

屌你老母好能煩 老馮人地要答你 ga

不如你答返以上個問題

我又想睇你你有咩高見

肥貓巴可以睇呢篇
我講既強化建築管制開始有人講
https://fortune.com/2025/01/11/la-wildfires-damages-billions-economic-recovery-decade-estimate/
洛杉磯多處大火無受控跡象 總損失現預計高達1500 億美元！
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區
https://lih.kg/3855611

Yet, when the rebuilding starts, Papadopoulos stressed that both homeowners and the government need to step up to build more resilient structures that can better withstand future fires.

For years, builders across the country have lowered their building standards and safety precautions in an effort to cut costs, he claimed. Many state and local governments have also turned a blind eye by not requiring buildings to be upgraded with safety features under strict deadlines to protect against disasters such as wildfires. Regulators have also been lax in raising standards for new construction, said Papadopoulos.

“In the name of efficiency, in the name of profit, and all these things, we've gone down this path of increasing risk and increasing vulnerability, and we're paying the price now,” he said.

屌崩你呀媽個老憑閪，老馮要答你ga

唔知你講緊邊張相同相片來源

右膠右癌有咩做唔出？成日出埋d fake news帶風向，好似你d咁嘅on9又信到十足

你咪就係專放fake news既死左膠囉



侵在位時俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭都噏得出，你學乜撚人話人fake news呀
收皮啦你件井底獨裁支持者

真係on9唔係扮. 難怪人地叫你四大癲王.

提醒下巴打, 2014仲係奧巴馬做緊

係睇清楚我上面張cap圖
2014係佢條死左膠噏既

咁多人同隻狗鬥吠都有嘅喂

強化建築我唔熟，但state building code 應該會review。

反而要處理係發展用地，再起喺山嘅邊錘地帶，更抗火都好，都係有危機。不過起好咗嗰啲都要面對保費問題。

咁你番去你老母西 la

睇死你條廢物都無野會答到

其實本身已經有NFPA 1144 (Standard for Reducing Structure
Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fire) 去管點起. 而當中California Building Code (姐係LA County Code, 兩者99% 相似) 亦都會提. 其實CBC/CFC 都係抄NPFA, 好多時都係叫你睇返NFPA做Reference

你間屋既情況, 係睇起既年份而去決定, Grandfathered in, 唔洗每四年Code Cycle Update 間屋, 除非間屋又大改動, 要入紙俾City 拎Permit. 咁就有機會叫你跟新Code.

冇人會咁有錢, 每四年俾20k Upgrade 間屋, 去跟最新既Code Cycle

起adu 係咪都一樣？

係，ADU 都要入紙做Plan Check, 跟哂最新Code Cycle ，另外要睇埋最新既Ordinance，有啲特別既位，例如Solar Panel, 佢會叫你預定個位，呢一下唔洗裝住，但圖入要畫定，成個System 要Solar Ready, 之後佢先會Approve 你份圖, 你一日冇份Approved For Drawings (AFC)圖，一日都冇得開工

所以Altadena 同Palisades 果班人死硬，份圖會俾人捉到傻

但而家保險公司講到明唔受保, 反而係政府陷於被動,
要立法監管到保險公司受保為止, 否則南加州會慢慢沉淪,
北加州都可能會受牽連.

呢方面, 我相信保險公司會比政府更專業.

屋企人上年起咗adu，其實係咪都叫有防火料？