計劃進修PhD/Research討論區 (9) 以有涯隨無涯 殆已

今日前發現我個lab 個undergrad 攞哂Princeton/Harvard/Yale/Stanford +n 個 offer

嘩 你個咩lab嚟

佢有篇first author PNAS
勁過我

ug就出pnas 我有佢百份一就好

Neuroscience (不過我地唔係dept of neuroscience)

諗緊係唔係今年冇offer就做一年RA 搏下出一份top journal or conference pub再報

寫完再交 一年內都未必咁快Accept

仲有部分research team唔俾RA寫paper的……

香港大把老細叫RA 寫paper 但唔俾出名

聽唔少
我當年係香港2間U醫學院唔同research team做過，2條team都只俾mphil/phd學生做data analysis同寫paper，RA單純收data
反而讀mphil時條team個老細俾RA同事寫paper仲俾佢做1st author

data collection 俾student helper 做
analysis 同做紙都係ra搞
我都以為ra係收data

做analysis 都唔落名？
我覺得除data collection 要唔要落名有爭議外
data analysis 同 寫都一定要有名

有時睇paper見到係響acknowledgement度thanks做analysis條友算

衰d ge 真係acknowledgement都唔俾

有啲落你做co-first author, 不過佢個名行先

香港大把老細叫RA 寫paper 但唔俾出名

聽唔少
我當年係香港2間U醫學院唔同research team做過，2條team都只俾mphil/phd學生做data analysis同寫paper，RA單純收data
反而讀mphil時條team個老細俾RA同事寫paper仲俾佢做1st author

data collection 俾student helper 做
analysis 同做紙都係ra搞
我都以為ra係收data

做analysis 都唔落名？
我覺得除data collection 要唔要落名有爭議外
data analysis 同 寫都一定要有名

有時睇paper見到係響acknowledgement度thanks做analysis條友算

衰d ge 真係acknowledgement都唔俾

有啲落你做co-first author, 不過佢個名行先

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

聽唔少
我當年係香港2間U醫學院唔同research team做過，2條team都只俾mphil/phd學生做data analysis同寫paper，RA單純收data
反而讀mphil時條team個老細俾RA同事寫paper仲俾佢做1st author

data collection 俾student helper 做
analysis 同做紙都係ra搞
我都以為ra係收data

做analysis 都唔落名？
我覺得除data collection 要唔要落名有爭議外
data analysis 同 寫都一定要有名

有時睇paper見到係響acknowledgement度thanks做analysis條友算

衰d ge 真係acknowledgement都唔俾

有啲落你做co-first author, 不過佢個名行先

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

你叫experimental physcis 朋友點算
一個實驗隨時幾打人

聽唔少
我當年係香港2間U醫學院唔同research team做過，2條team都只俾mphil/phd學生做data analysis同寫paper，RA單純收data
反而讀mphil時條team個老細俾RA同事寫paper仲俾佢做1st author

data collection 俾student helper 做
analysis 同做紙都係ra搞
我都以為ra係收data

做analysis 都唔落名？
我覺得除data collection 要唔要落名有爭議外
data analysis 同 寫都一定要有名

有時睇paper見到係響acknowledgement度thanks做analysis條友算

衰d ge 真係acknowledgement都唔俾

有啲落你做co-first author, 不過佢個名行先

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

你叫experimental physcis 朋友點算
一個實驗隨時幾打人

做gene嘅閒閒地四五十人

聽唔少
我當年係香港2間U醫學院唔同research team做過，2條team都只俾mphil/phd學生做data analysis同寫paper，RA單純收data
反而讀mphil時條team個老細俾RA同事寫paper仲俾佢做1st author

data collection 俾student helper 做
analysis 同做紙都係ra搞
我都以為ra係收data

做analysis 都唔落名？
我覺得除data collection 要唔要落名有爭議外
data analysis 同 寫都一定要有名

有時睇paper見到係響acknowledgement度thanks做analysis條友算

衰d ge 真係acknowledgement都唔俾

有啲落你做co-first author, 不過佢個名行先

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

你叫experimental physcis 朋友點算
一個實驗隨時幾打人

做gene嘅閒閒地四五十人

文科係另外一個極端 ling唔計neuro同computational，通常都係得1-3人 搵篇多過四個嘅都唔容易

衰d ge 真係acknowledgement都唔俾

有啲落你做co-first author, 不過佢個名行先

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

你叫experimental physcis 朋友點算
一個實驗隨時幾打人

做gene嘅閒閒地四五十人

文科係另外一個極端 ling唔計neuro同computational，通常都係得1-3人 搵篇多過四個嘅都唔容易

advisor都叫我唔好做nuclear physics,大既collaboration成千人,做一世都未必出到頭

Project人一太多，太講求division of labour，就無左暸解成個big picture既樂趣

冇乜 好似得返兩三間
返工姐 難我唔倒嘅

巴打咩field 見你考慮會係ust mphil

識多個同學都好

CS
巴打已經有UST MPhil offer?

Yes不過名係bioeng 做cs野

你就好
我呢邊in都未in
都唔知係未schedule interview定係廢撚事in我

你唔係原校？直接email搵？

你有咩research interest?

我聽返大部分都係主動搵

係原校
research interest唔講啦 驚自爆
你意思係submit完個application之後要主動搵interview?

衰d ge 真係acknowledgement都唔俾

有啲落你做co-first author, 不過佢個名行先

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

你叫experimental physcis 朋友點算
一個實驗隨時幾打人

做gene嘅閒閒地四五十人

文科係另外一個極端 ling唔計neuro同computational，通常都係得1-3人 搵篇多過四個嘅都唔容易

advisor都叫我唔好做nuclear physics,大既collaboration成千人,做一世都未必出到頭

Project人一太多，太講求division of labour，就無左暸解成個big picture既樂趣

但果啲project 好難獨力完成

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

你叫experimental physcis 朋友點算
一個實驗隨時幾打人

做gene嘅閒閒地四五十人

文科係另外一個極端 ling唔計neuro同computational，通常都係得1-3人 搵篇多過四個嘅都唔容易

advisor都叫我唔好做nuclear physics,大既collaboration成千人,做一世都未必出到頭

Project人一太多，太講求division of labour，就無左暸解成個big picture既樂趣

但果啲project 好難獨力完成

https://instagram.com/p/BN_bQuAgoVp/

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

你叫experimental physcis 朋友點算
一個實驗隨時幾打人

做gene嘅閒閒地四五十人

文科係另外一個極端 ling唔計neuro同computational，通常都係得1-3人 搵篇多過四個嘅都唔容易

advisor都叫我唔好做nuclear physics,大既collaboration成千人,做一世都未必出到頭

Project人一太多，太講求division of labour，就無左暸解成個big picture既樂趣

但果啲project 好難獨力完成

Job nature唔同，你會覺得自己似technician/engineer多過scientist，鍾意就得啦

冇乜 好似得返兩三間
返工姐 難我唔倒嘅

巴打咩field 見你考慮會係ust mphil

識多個同學都好

CS
巴打已經有UST MPhil offer?

Yes不過名係bioeng 做cs野

你就好
我呢邊in都未in
都唔知係未schedule interview定係廢撚事in我

你唔係原校？直接email搵？

你有咩research interest?

我聽返大部分都係主動搵

係原校
research interest唔講啦 驚自爆
你意思係submit完個application之後要主動搵interview?

CS
巴打已經有UST MPhil offer?

Yes不過名係bioeng 做cs野

你就好
我呢邊in都未in
都唔知係未schedule interview定係廢撚事in我

你唔係原校？直接email搵？

你有咩research interest?

我聽返大部分都係主動搵

係原校
research interest唔講啦 驚自爆
你意思係submit完個application之後要主動搵interview?

衰d ge 真係acknowledgement都唔俾

有啲落你做co-first author, 不過佢個名行先

我估係睇唔同U既policy，CU計corresponding author，所以professor自己唔介意排好後。
Author少d，每個author睇落做到既野咪多d［好似係

你叫experimental physcis 朋友點算
一個實驗隨時幾打人

做gene嘅閒閒地四五十人

文科係另外一個極端 ling唔計neuro同computational，通常都係得1-3人 搵篇多過四個嘅都唔容易

advisor都叫我唔好做nuclear physics,大既collaboration成千人,做一世都未必出到頭

haha.. nuclear 好

"To scientists, citations are currency. No, you can’t use them to put gas in your car or food on your table. But surviving in academia means publishing papers people want to read and, more to the point, cite in their own research. Citations establish credibility, and determine the impact of a given paper, researcher, and institution. Simply put, they fundamentally shape what people believe."

http://wrd.cm/2paNHBY

今日前發現我個lab 個undergrad 攞哂Princeton/Harvard/Yale/Stanford +n 個 offer

嘩 你個咩lab嚟

佢有篇first author PNAS
勁過我

咩field

Neuroscience (不過我地唔係dept of neuroscience)

諗緊係唔係今年冇offer就做一年RA 搏下出一份top journal or conference pub再報

寫完再交 一年內都未必咁快Accept

仲有部分research team唔俾RA寫paper的……

我係做Machine Learning 當然開始做果時會講定想出paper啦
同埋conference pub應該快啲既 都有幾個top conference
Machine learning, CS, Math, Stat 呢啲唔同experimental science, 唔洗靠個lab都可以做到research

"To scientists, citations are currency. No, you can’t use them to put gas in your car or food on your table. But surviving in academia means publishing papers people want to read and, more to the point, cite in their own research. Citations establish credibility, and determine the impact of a given paper, researcher, and institution. Simply put, they fundamentally shape what people believe."

http://wrd.cm/2paNHBY

特別empirical, top journal citation = 塞住reviewers把口

佢有篇first author PNAS
勁過我

咩field

Neuroscience (不過我地唔係dept of neuroscience)

諗緊係唔係今年冇offer就做一年RA 搏下出一份top journal or conference pub再報

寫完再交 一年內都未必咁快Accept

仲有部分research team唔俾RA寫paper的……

我係做Machine Learning 當然開始做果時會講定想出paper啦
同埋conference pub應該快啲既 都有幾個top conference
Machine learning, CS, Math, Stat 呢啲唔同experimental science, 唔洗靠個lab都可以做到research

其實無pi出唔出到paper?

佢有篇first author PNAS
勁過我

咩field

Neuroscience (不過我地唔係dept of neuroscience)

諗緊係唔係今年冇offer就做一年RA 搏下出一份top journal or conference pub再報

寫完再交 一年內都未必咁快Accept

仲有部分research team唔俾RA寫paper的……

我係做Machine Learning 當然開始做果時會講定想出paper啦
同埋conference pub應該快啲既 都有幾個top conference
Machine learning, CS, Math, Stat 呢啲唔同experimental science, 唔洗靠個lab都可以做到research

其實無pi出唔出到paper?

google/fb都會有paper 咁算唔算冇pi

都有諗過呢個問題
如果手寫一張thank you letter點睇?

Neuroscience (不過我地唔係dept of neuroscience)

諗緊係唔係今年冇offer就做一年RA 搏下出一份top journal or conference pub再報

寫完再交 一年內都未必咁快Accept

仲有部分research team唔俾RA寫paper的……

我係做Machine Learning 當然開始做果時會講定想出paper啦
同埋conference pub應該快啲既 都有幾個top conference
Machine learning, CS, Math, Stat 呢啲唔同experimental science, 唔洗靠個lab都可以做到research

其實無pi出唔出到paper?

google/fb都會有paper 咁算唔算冇pi

咁唔同field文化好唔同