無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份 點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert
越改越難
玩都咁激!
尋日先同同事討論過呢個問題
我覺得呢d review 唔一定要由expert 先寫到
但新手一定用多好多時間
但只要推論引證係正確
我唔覺得你同expert 會有咩差別
無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份 點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert
越改越難
咁meta應該最易寫
兩睇啦
meta analysis 相對上冇咁innovative
唔易pub 上high impact journal
如果你係專做method 既psychometric 人
咁你做meta 咪冇咩問題
但你想做番experiment 就有難度
所以我個人覺得meta 一兩篇已經夠
多俾人感覺好似paper hunter 咁
同問 搵paper個時有冇得揀返睇top journal ge paper only
平時用開pubmed,自己整左個search term 淨係出我想睇嗰幾十份
psy有咩top.journal 有時真係估估下
general 既咪psychological science
做emotion 既咪 Emotion
做neuroscience 既咪 Cerebral Cortex
做 clinical psy 既咪 Journal of Abnormal Psycology
做 psychiatry 既咪 JAMA psychiatry
ummmm. 其實真係好睇你做咩field
興其睇邊份 jounral
不如睇某個field 既experts or leading groups
純粹hunting
有啲dept可能對某啲journal有hesitation
不過我估入phd唔會理咁多掛,見你高ranking/IF應該都得掛...
咁meta應該最易寫
兩睇啦
meta analysis 相對上冇咁innovative
唔易pub 上high impact journal
如果你係專做method 既psychometric 人
咁你做meta 咪冇咩問題
但你想做番experiment 就有難度
所以我個人覺得meta 一兩篇已經夠
多俾人感覺好似paper hunter 咁
同問 搵paper個時有冇得揀返睇top journal ge paper only
平時用開pubmed,自己整左個search term 淨係出我想睇嗰幾十份
psy有咩top.journal 有時真係估估下
general 既咪psychological science
做emotion 既咪 Emotion
做neuroscience 既咪 Cerebral Cortex
做 clinical psy 既咪 Journal of Abnormal Psycology
做 psychiatry 既咪 JAMA psychiatry
ummmm. 其實真係好睇你做咩field
興其睇邊份 jounral
不如睇某個field 既experts or leading groups
純粹hunting
有啲dept可能對某啲journal有hesitation
不過我估入phd唔會理咁多掛,見你高ranking/IF應該都得掛...
報phd 有文揸手都唔錯嫁啦
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位,
一個gpa3.9無文,一個gpa3.2有Q1文,咁會點揀
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
冇pub咪畀人reject
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位,
一個gpa3.9無文,一個gpa3.2有Q1文,咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位,
一個gpa3.9無文,一個gpa3.2有Q1文,咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
冇pub咪畀人reject
pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位,
一個gpa3.9無文,一個gpa3.2有Q1文,咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
姐係都係傾向揀有文? 如果佢岩interest
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
A research sample is a better signal than GPA
如果得一個位,
一個gpa3.9無文,一個gpa3.2有Q1文,咁會點揀
仲有會睇research interest 夾唔夾
出既文係咪岩自己個field
姐係都係傾向揀有文? 如果佢岩interest
umm. 叫做有多d 機會可以interview 囉
無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份 點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert
越改越難
玩都咁激!
尋日先同同事討論過呢個問題
我覺得呢d review 唔一定要由expert 先寫到
但新手一定用多好多時間
但只要推論引證係正確
我唔覺得你同expert 會有咩差別
有無巴打成功apply過external funding/scholarship? 你地按咩criteria去寫到說服到committee?
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
冇pub咪畀人reject
pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文?
平均每人一年會有幾多架?
無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份 點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert
越改越難
屌交cv on9
說好了的double blind呢
有幾可真係double blind
一google就搵到,blind條毛
但係佢咁做咪即係樣都唔做下 要畀cv publications畀reviewer睇
無知一問 review paper係咪易寫好多?
好撚難寫
我最近掟左一份 點知個editor要我交cv and publication list
等佢同reviewer 判斷我係咪係呢個field既expert
越改越難
邊本journal
btw, 巴打你係sole author?
點解你地報phd都要有pub咁chur
冇pub咪畀人reject
pure math都係睇有無大粒野推薦姐, 反正99.9%都唔會有pub, 一係就垃圾
其實pure math d prof是咪都好少文?
平均每人一年會有幾多架?
好睇咩topic同個prof出紙個心態
有無巴打成功apply過external funding/scholarship? 你地按咩criteria去寫到說服到committee?
搭單問,其實RGC啲research funding 是咪一定要係大專院校既人先可以申請?自己就咁submit個proposal得唔得架