計劃進修PhD/Research討論區 (9) 以有涯隨無涯 殆已

發現之前同人傾個idea有人pub左一鳩毛一樣既野
Model一鳩毛一樣 同埋本身想做theory+experiment
佢又係咁做

不過想讀 ge 真係要諗諗
唔係想做 prof 其實讀 phd 好悶

最慘係
Academic 呢行好黑暗
出紙都係睇老細
Double blind review 都好
一眼就知邊個出

最on 9係
好多時 conference 同 journal review
D 老細都係掉比 d 細ge 做
我以前一年都做10 份8 份
通常都係睇頭睇尾算

之後d 人出紙都係抄抄下。
Idea 改少少又掉出來

你係邊個國家？
行行都有佢地既規則
覺得做academia就一定好高尚既真係too simple too naive

你可以選擇做高尚
但唔好expert 其他人都會

有無巴打係或者有做management/business field paper?

做乜鳩

是咁的 今日同老細傾PhD application, 佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低，相反玩management既behavioral science 會更有錢途，更加易tenure 因為management 多top tier 好似AMJ AMR. 但改變影響太大，因為我始終比較鍾意玩individual level psycho decision making多過OB marco, 但係又要為更遠諗 Uncle J你點睇

佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低

Really?

點低法

起碼差一個range, 最重要係tenure 因為都係睇你有幾多篇A management field多過behavioral psycho field, 令到相對比psycho prof容易拎tenure

Tenure requirement唔知。不過有econ phd同學最尾搵左marketing/management school。
然後講marketing grad的人數少好多，變相容易搵工。
你讀左一輪behavioral野，其實都要諗下想點樣發展你讀過的野。要再pure啲定apply啲?

發現之前同人傾個idea有人pub左一鳩毛一樣既野
Model一鳩毛一樣 同埋本身想做theory+experiment
佢又係咁做

經常發生。我試過一次。
有個神級prof講佢AP等篇文食糊tenure個陣發現同人撞到鳩毛都一樣。
後尾本top journal話只可以accept一篇，然後係個conference度個editor請晒兩班人睇下邊一邊pre得好啲就accept個篇。
個prof當然畀啲coauthor擺上台去pre，最尾雖然佢pub到，但係話pre個陣慘過食三舊屎。

巴打好熟，瞬間知道我講緊邊個program仲提供咁多資料

我而家唯一猶豫既係Strasbourg個ranking太低（雖然life sci subject ranking唔錯），而張cert淨係印Strasbourg個名

有冇得睇佢地d graduate 出路?
問秘書可能有

網站冇寫，我問下

不過我諗master rank幾多應該唔太重要，除非係top 15/30 名校

Results
They have been awarded a master degree in neuroscience: 90%
They had to stop their training for personal/economical reasons: 2.9%
They left to get a job: 2.9%
They left to continue their clinical job: 2.9%
They left to continue another master training: 1.3%
Where are they now ?
They are presently doing a PhD: 85%
They were awarded and exert a clinical activity: 10%
They were awarded and are still looking for a job or PhD proposal: 5%

巴打都諗住報呢個program?

我唔係neuro 但歐洲近瑞士既area都略有所聞咁
我今年會去英國DPhil computational & structural bio

不過想讀 ge 真係要諗諗
唔係想做 prof 其實讀 phd 好悶

最慘係
Academic 呢行好黑暗
出紙都係睇老細
Double blind review 都好
一眼就知邊個出

最on 9係
好多時 conference 同 journal review
D 老細都係掉比 d 細ge 做
我以前一年都做10 份8 份
通常都係睇頭睇尾算

之後d 人出紙都係抄抄下。
Idea 改少少又掉出來

不過想讀 ge 真係要諗諗
唔係想做 prof 其實讀 phd 好悶

最慘係
Academic 呢行好黑暗
出紙都係睇老細
Double blind review 都好
一眼就知邊個出

最on 9係
好多時 conference 同 journal review
D 老細都係掉比 d 細ge 做
我以前一年都做10 份8 份
通常都係睇頭睇尾算

之後d 人出紙都係抄抄下。
Idea 改少少又掉出來

你係邊個國家？
行行都有佢地既規則
覺得做academia就一定好高尚既真係too simple too naive

你可以選擇做高尚
但唔好expert 其他人都會

有無巴打係或者有做management/business field paper?

做乜鳩

是咁的 今日同老細傾PhD application, 佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低，相反玩management既behavioral science 會更有錢途，更加易tenure 因為management 多top tier 好似AMJ AMR. 但改變影響太大，因為我始終比較鍾意玩individual level psycho decision making多過OB marco, 但係又要為更遠諗 Uncle J你點睇

佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低

Really?

點低法

起碼差一個range, 最重要係tenure 因為都係睇你有幾多篇A management field多過behavioral psycho field, 令到相對比psycho prof容易拎tenure

Tenure requirement唔知。不過有econ phd同學最尾搵左marketing/management school。
然後講marketing grad的人數少好多，變相容易搵工。
你讀左一輪behavioral野，其實都要諗下想點樣發展你讀過的野。要再pure啲定apply啲?

我做apply既，正如而家都係做緊business-related, 我要好好諗下 thank you

不過想讀 ge 真係要諗諗
唔係想做 prof 其實讀 phd 好悶

最慘係
Academic 呢行好黑暗
出紙都係睇老細
Double blind review 都好
一眼就知邊個出

最on 9係
好多時 conference 同 journal review
D 老細都係掉比 d 細ge 做
我以前一年都做10 份8 份
通常都係睇頭睇尾算

之後d 人出紙都係抄抄下。
Idea 改少少又掉出來

不過想讀 ge 真係要諗諗
唔係想做 prof 其實讀 phd 好悶

最慘係
Academic 呢行好黑暗
出紙都係睇老細
Double blind review 都好
一眼就知邊個出

最on 9係
好多時 conference 同 journal review
D 老細都係掉比 d 細ge 做
我以前一年都做10 份8 份
通常都係睇頭睇尾算

之後d 人出紙都係抄抄下。
Idea 改少少又掉出來

係香港做？

有無巴打係或者有做management/business field paper?

做乜鳩

是咁的 今日同老細傾PhD application, 佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低，相反玩management既behavioral science 會更有錢途，更加易tenure 因為management 多top tier 好似AMJ AMR. 但改變影響太大，因為我始終比較鍾意玩individual level psycho decision making多過OB marco, 但係又要為更遠諗 Uncle J你點睇

讀psycho搵ap position搵management都得姐
同埋 你讀phd諗乜鳩錢途 諗錢就唔好讀啦

有冇得睇佢地d graduate 出路?
問秘書可能有

網站冇寫，我問下

不過我諗master rank幾多應該唔太重要，除非係top 15/30 名校

Results
They have been awarded a master degree in neuroscience: 90%
They had to stop their training for personal/economical reasons: 2.9%
They left to get a job: 2.9%
They left to continue their clinical job: 2.9%
They left to continue another master training: 1.3%
Where are they now ?
They are presently doing a PhD: 85%
They were awarded and exert a clinical activity: 10%
They were awarded and are still looking for a job or PhD proposal: 5%

巴打都諗住報呢個program?

我唔係neuro 但歐洲近瑞士既area都略有所聞咁
我今年會去英國DPhil computational & structural bio

有無巴打係或者有做management/business field paper?

做乜鳩

是咁的 今日同老細傾PhD application, 佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低，相反玩management既behavioral science 會更有錢途，更加易tenure 因為management 多top tier 好似AMJ AMR. 但改變影響太大，因為我始終比較鍾意玩individual level psycho decision making多過OB marco, 但係又要為更遠諗 Uncle J你點睇

讀psycho搵ap position搵management都得姐
同埋 你讀phd諗乜鳩錢途 諗錢就唔好讀啦

發現之前同人傾個idea有人pub左一鳩毛一樣既野
Model一鳩毛一樣 同埋本身想做theory+experiment
佢又係咁做

經常發生。我試過一次。
有個神級prof講佢AP等篇文食糊tenure個陣發現同人撞到鳩毛都一樣。
後尾本top journal話只可以accept一篇，然後係個conference度個editor請晒兩班人睇下邊一邊pre得好啲就accept個篇。
個prof當然畀啲coauthor擺上台去pre，最尾雖然佢pub到，但係話pre個陣慘過食三舊屎。

好彩我未開始做 人地兩個northwestern prof點夠鬥

是咁的 今日同老細傾PhD application, 佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低，相反玩management既behavioral science 會更有錢途，更加易tenure 因為management 多top tier 好似AMJ AMR. 但改變影響太大，因為我始終比較鍾意玩individual level psycho decision making多過OB marco, 但係又要為更遠諗 Uncle J你點睇

佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低

Really?

點低法

起碼差一個range, 最重要係tenure 因為都係睇你有幾多篇A management field多過behavioral psycho field, 令到相對比psycho prof容易拎tenure

Tenure requirement唔知。不過有econ phd同學最尾搵左marketing/management school。
然後講marketing grad的人數少好多，變相容易搵工。
你讀左一輪behavioral野，其實都要諗下想點樣發展你讀過的野。要再pure啲定apply啲?

我做apply既，正如而家都係做緊business-related, 我要好好諗下 thank you

過兩日會同management school啲friends食飯，我記得會問下behavioral係睇錢啲的field有咩路數。如果我記得的話...

發現之前同人傾個idea有人pub左一鳩毛一樣既野
Model一鳩毛一樣 同埋本身想做theory+experiment
佢又係咁做

經常發生。我試過一次。
有個神級prof講佢AP等篇文食糊tenure個陣發現同人撞到鳩毛都一樣。
後尾本top journal話只可以accept一篇，然後係個conference度個editor請晒兩班人睇下邊一邊pre得好啲就accept個篇。
個prof當然畀啲coauthor擺上台去pre，最尾雖然佢pub到，但係話pre個陣慘過食三舊屎。

好彩我未開始做 人地兩個northwestern prof點夠鬥

諗過個idea再戰

有無巴打係或者有做management/business field paper?

做乜鳩

是咁的 今日同老細傾PhD application, 佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低，相反玩management既behavioral science 會更有錢途，更加易tenure 因為management 多top tier 好似AMJ AMR. 但改變影響太大，因為我始終比較鍾意玩individual level psycho decision making多過OB marco, 但係又要為更遠諗 Uncle J你點睇

讀psycho搵ap position搵management都得姐
同埋 你讀phd諗乜鳩錢途 諗錢就唔好讀啦

前途點定義先？但如果做business果邊你預左係theoretical thinking果part係無咁大挑戰性。而psycho可以駁到好多field,而且追求真理或者學術成就會多啲野玩。

但business果邊好多時都係現象性同modeling, 而且佢地睇既多數係effectiveness 果類野，當然唔係全部

做過business research就覺得佢地有時真係好流
純個人睇法

http://geekpsychologist.com/what-is-the-average-salary-for-a-psychology-professor/引用

不過想讀 ge 真係要諗諗
唔係想做 prof 其實讀 phd 好悶

最慘係
Academic 呢行好黑暗
出紙都係睇老細
Double blind review 都好
一眼就知邊個出

最on 9係
好多時 conference 同 journal review
D 老細都係掉比 d 細ge 做
我以前一年都做10 份8 份
通常都係睇頭睇尾算

之後d 人出紙都係抄抄下。
Idea 改少少又掉出來

發現之前同人傾個idea有人pub左一鳩毛一樣既野
Model一鳩毛一樣 同埋本身想做theory+experiment
佢又係咁做

經常發生。我試過一次。
有個神級prof講佢AP等篇文食糊tenure個陣發現同人撞到鳩毛都一樣。
後尾本top journal話只可以accept一篇，然後係個conference度個editor請晒兩班人睇下邊一邊pre得好啲就accept個篇。
個prof當然畀啲coauthor擺上台去pre，最尾雖然佢pub到，但係話pre個陣慘過食三舊屎。

好彩我未開始做 人地兩個northwestern prof點夠鬥

諗過個idea再戰

同佢地大戰三百回合。

有無巴打係或者有做management/business field paper?

做乜鳩

是咁的 今日同老細傾PhD application, 佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低，相反玩management既behavioral science 會更有錢途，更加易tenure 因為management 多top tier 好似AMJ AMR. 但改變影響太大，因為我始終比較鍾意玩individual level psycho decision making多過OB marco, 但係又要為更遠諗 Uncle J你點睇

讀psycho搵ap position搵management都得姐
同埋 你讀phd諗乜鳩錢途 諗錢就唔好讀啦

前途點定義先？但如果做business果邊你預左係theoretical thinking果part係無咁大挑戰性。而psycho可以駁到好多field,而且追求真理或者學術成就會多啲野玩。

但business果邊好多時都係現象性同modeling, 而且佢地睇既多數係effectiveness 果類野，當然唔係全部

做過business research就覺得佢地有時真係好流
純個人睇法

係 但係我做apply多，本身個interests都係based psycho既interdiscplinary study, 加上老細既講法先搞到我好煩 究竟係psycho PhD->business 定business PhD->business

http://geekpsychologist.com/what-is-the-average-salary-for-a-psychology-professor/引用

岩岩睇到佢條link講錢途

發現之前同人傾個idea有人pub左一鳩毛一樣既野
Model一鳩毛一樣 同埋本身想做theory+experiment
佢又係咁做

經常發生。我試過一次。
有個神級prof講佢AP等篇文食糊tenure個陣發現同人撞到鳩毛都一樣。
後尾本top journal話只可以accept一篇，然後係個conference度個editor請晒兩班人睇下邊一邊pre得好啲就accept個篇。
個prof當然畀啲coauthor擺上台去pre，最尾雖然佢pub到，但係話pre個陣慘過食三舊屎。

好彩我未開始做 人地兩個northwestern prof點夠鬥

諗過個idea再戰

同佢地大戰三百回合。

本身有另一個idea係類似generalize d既model
解釋到另一樣野 依加唔知做唔做好

發現之前同人傾個idea有人pub左一鳩毛一樣既野
Model一鳩毛一樣 同埋本身想做theory+experiment
佢又係咁做

經常發生。我試過一次。
有個神級prof講佢AP等篇文食糊tenure個陣發現同人撞到鳩毛都一樣。
後尾本top journal話只可以accept一篇，然後係個conference度個editor請晒兩班人睇下邊一邊pre得好啲就accept個篇。
個prof當然畀啲coauthor擺上台去pre，最尾雖然佢pub到，但係話pre個陣慘過食三舊屎。

好彩我未開始做 人地兩個northwestern prof點夠鬥

諗過個idea再戰

同佢地大戰三百回合。

本身有另一個idea係類似generalize d既model
解釋到另一樣野 依加唔知做唔做好

網站冇寫，我問下

不過我諗master rank幾多應該唔太重要，除非係top 15/30 名校

Results
They have been awarded a master degree in neuroscience: 90%
They had to stop their training for personal/economical reasons: 2.9%
They left to get a job: 2.9%
They left to continue their clinical job: 2.9%
They left to continue another master training: 1.3%
Where are they now ?
They are presently doing a PhD: 85%
They were awarded and exert a clinical activity: 10%
They were awarded and are still looking for a job or PhD proposal: 5%

巴打都諗住報呢個program?

我唔係neuro 但歐洲近瑞士既area都略有所聞咁
我今年會去英國DPhil computational & structural bio

係香港做？

有無巴打係或者有做management/business field paper?

做乜鳩

是咁的 今日同老細傾PhD application, 佢見到我個list成堆psycho就話係美國前途好暗淡人工低，相反玩management既behavioral science 會更有錢途，更加易tenure 因為management 多top tier 好似AMJ AMR. 但改變影響太大，因為我始終比較鍾意玩individual level psycho decision making多過OB marco, 但係又要為更遠諗 Uncle J你點睇

讀psycho搵ap position搵management都得姐
同埋 你讀phd諗乜鳩錢途 諗錢就唔好讀啦

前途點定義先？但如果做business果邊你預左係theoretical thinking果part係無咁大挑戰性。而psycho可以駁到好多field,而且追求真理或者學術成就會多啲野玩。

但business果邊好多時都係現象性同modeling, 而且佢地睇既多數係effectiveness 果類野，當然唔係全部

做過business research就覺得佢地有時真係好流
純個人睇法

係 但係我做apply多，本身個interests都係based psycho既interdiscplinary study, 加上老細既講法先搞到我好煩 究竟係psycho PhD->business 定business PhD->business

http://geekpsychologist.com/what-is-the-average-salary-for-a-psychology-professor/引用

岩岩睇到佢條link講錢途

sure美國business phd offers多過psycho?
我淨係知香港係psycho多過business, 除非將所有business field加晒